Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2041 SAUL HILLEL BENJAMIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NICHOLAS SPARKS; EPIPHANY SCHOOL OF GLOBAL STUDIES; NICHOLAS SPARKS FOUNDATION, Defendants - Appellees, and MISSY BLACKERBY; TRACY LORENTZEN; KEN GRAY,

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 60 Docket: Som-22-182 Argued: April 6, 2023 Decided: August 31, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. NICHOLAS W. NORRIS CONNORS, J. [¶1] Nicholas W. Norris appeals fr

OPINION WOLFSON, United States District Judge: This matter arises out of a Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Alma and Gregory Rush (collectively, “Plaintiffs’”), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., as well as a state law claim for invasion of privacy. Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Defendant” or “Portfolio”) filed a motion fo

620 F.3d 153 (2010) John F. LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Brian P. Daniels, Esq., Ruth Ann Azeredo, Esq., Appellants, v. RICHMAN GROUP OF CT LLC, USA Inst Tax Credit Fund XXXVI, USA Inst Tax Credit Fund XXXVIII, Defendants-Appellees, Richman Group Capital Corp., Richman Group, Inc., Richman Asset Mgmt., LLC, Richman Group of N.Y. LLC, Richman Group Mgmt Corp, USA Institutional Tax Credit Fund XXVII LP, Richman USA Tax Credit XXVII LP, Ri

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA THE WEITZ COMPANY L.L.C., AN IOWA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. NICHOLAS HETH, A SINGLE MAN; BARRY SCHWARTZ, A MARRIED MAN; JEFFREY TEMPLIN, A MARRIED MAN; KEN PERLMUTTER, A MARRIED MAN; SHELLY MALKIN, A MARRIED WOMAN; JODY STORM GALE AND CHRISTIE BAUER GALE, HUSBAND AND WIFE; JEFF TEMPLIN AND TERRI TEMPLIN, HUSBAND AND WIF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA THE WEITZ COMPANY L.L.C., AN IOWA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. NICHOLAS HETH, A SINGLE MAN; BARRY SCHWARTZ, A MARRIED MAN; JEFFREY TEMPLIN, A MARRIED MAN; KEN PERLMUTTER, A MARRIED MAN; SHELLY MALKIN, A MARRIED WOMAN; JODY STORM GALE AND CHRISTIE BAUER GALE, HUSBAND AND WIFE; JEFF TEMPLIN AND TERRI TEMPLIN, HUSBAND AND WIF

2018 WI 4 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP21 COMPLETE TITLE: Metropolitan Associates, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. City of Milwaukee, Defendant-Respondent. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

Judgment rendered April 10, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,534-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ETC TIGER PIPELINE, LLC

2018 WI 4 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP21 COMPLETE TITLE: Metropolitan Associates, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. City of Milwaukee, Defendant-Respondent. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD GIBSON; ROBERTO No. 24-3576 MANZO, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00140- Plaintiffs - Appellants, MMD-DJA v. CENDYN GROUP, LLC; THE OPINION RAINMAKER GROUP UNLIMITED, INC.; CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; TREASURE ISLAND, LLC; WYNN RE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NETCHOICE, LLC, No. 25-146 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:24-cv-07885- EJD v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: John Cloutier has sued his former employer, GoJet Airlines, for alleged violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) (counts 1-8, 10-11) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (count 12). GoJet has moved for summary judgment on all of Cloutier's claims. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants GoJet's motion in part and denies it in part. Background<

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CYGNUS OPPORTUNITY FUND, LLC, ) CYGNUS PROPERTY FUND V, LLC, ) CYGNUS PROPERTY FUND IV, LLC, ) CHAND KARAMCHANDANI, SHAMI ) KARAMCHANDANI, ALEX ) KEOLEIAN, K-BAR HOLDINGS, LLC, ) and SHIKAR PARTAB ) ) Plaintiffs, )

Howard v. IOMAXIS, LLC, 2021 NCBC 82. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 18 CVS 11679 KELLY C. HOWARD and FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE RONALD E. HOWARD REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2016, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND

Howard v. IOMAXIS, LLC, 2020 NCBC 36. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 18 CVS 11679 KELLY C. HOWARD and FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE RONALD E. HOWARD REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2016, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED, ORDER AND OPINION ON

Cite as 2025 Ark. 180 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-710 Opinion Delivered: November 13, 2025 DAVID SCOTT TAYLOR APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 60CV-22-3911] V. H

237 P.3d 1196 (2010) GRACIE, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, and Barnes & Barnes Enterprises, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, Petitioners-Appellants, v. IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, Respondent. No. 36111. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, June 2010 Term. June 28, 2010. Rehearing Denied August 31,

674 F.Supp.2d 668 (2009) Thomas R. WHITTAKER, Christy L. Whittaker, Estate of David C. Hamilton, and Edna J. Hamilton, as Executrix of the Estate of David C. Hamilton, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, Township of Neshannock, Lawrence County Economic Development Corporation, Redevelopment Authority of Lawrence County, Steve J. Craig, Daniel J. Vogler, Frank Telesz, James Gagliano, Jr., Dennis F. Alduk, Joseph Caminiti, Ryan Kegel, Jon Natale, Ga

ECKER, J. Section 324A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts imposes negligence liability, when certain conditions are met, on a party whose negligent performance of a contractual undertaking causes foreseeable physical harm to a nonparty to the contract. The present appeals require us to determine the scope of this duty under unusual circumstances. For approximately one week preceding

*953OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: In this opinion, we address an important policy question concerning the proper scope of the record before this court and the extent to which this court may determine facts, if at all, when it considers a certified question from a federal court. The present matter arises in a pending certification