Cases

(2008) Maeve McGRATH-MALOTT, Plaintiff, v. State of MARYLAND, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. RDB-06-879. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. In this employment discrimination case, Maeve McGrath-Malott ("Plaintiff or "McGrath-Malott"), formerly a Deputy

Panel: Arthur, Leahy, Reed, JJ. * Arthur, J. *447 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statutory and Regulatory Background...554 A. The Maryland St

100 Md. App. 369 (1994) 641 A.2d 941 PAMELA SNOWHITE DAVIS v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 840, September Term, 1993. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 2, 1994. Daniel F. Goldstein (Brown, Goldstein & Levy, on the brief) Baltimore, for appellant. Michael D. Berman and Susan Goering, Baltimore, for amicus curiae, The American Civ

24 Md. App. 128 (1975) 331 A.2d 78 PETER C. ANDRESEN v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 152, September Term, 1974. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 10, 1975. *133 The cause was argued before MORTON, MOYLAN and POWERS, JJ. Philip J. Hirschkop, Peter C. Andresen and Frank W. Mars

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, John Peterson, filed this lawsuit against his former employer AT & T Mobility Services, LLC (“AT & T”), claiming breach of contract and wrongful termination stemming from his termination, on October 6, 2010, for violating an internal, company policy requiring the prompt reporting of certain driving infractio

McLEESE, Associate Judge: Robert Parker filed suit in California state court against several defendants, including his former employer, law firm K & L Gates, LLP, and two of its partners. Invoking arbitration and forum-selection clauses in the firm’s partnership agreement, the K & L Gates defendants moved in the District of Columbia Superior Court to compel arbitration. The Superior Court ordered the parties to arbit

OPINION AND ORDER HARMON, District Judge. The above referenced class action, grounded in the Employee Retirement Income Seeurity Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and alleging under section 409(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a), breach of fiduciary duty against fiduciaries of three Enron Corporation ERISA plans,1 is before the Court on objecti

801 A.2d 1092 (2002) 145 Md. App. 96 Ezra R. JOHNSON, v. CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION BOARD. No. 273, September Term, 2001. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 28, 2002. *1095 Richard D. Rosenthal and Scott S. London (Tydings & Rosenberg, LLP and Fred S. London, on the brief), Baltimore, for a

942 F.Supp. 1295 (1996) Burt CABANAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GLOODT ASSOCIATES, et al., Defendants. No. CIV-S-94-1481 DFL PAN. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 25, 1996. *1296 *1297 *1298 *1299 Ja

384 F.Supp.2d 1039 (2005) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Charles E. HURWITZ, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. H-95-3956. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. August 23, 2005. *1040 *1041 *1042 *1043

729 F.Supp.2d 304 (2010) Dean Kevin LURIE, M.D. Plaintiff, v. MID-ATLANTIC PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-01386 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 9, 2010. *313 James S. Bubar, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. R. Michael Smith, Charles Robert Bacharach, Gordon Fe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DEAN KEVIN LURIE, M.D. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) Civil Action No. 06-01386 (RCL) v. ) ) MID-ATLANTIC PERMANENTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA E.M., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-657 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 15, 48, 50, 51 : SHADY GROVE REPRODUCTIVE : SCIENCE CENTER P.C., 1

73 F.Supp.2d 177 (1999) Lilliam MALDONADO-CORDERO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT & T, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 98-2386(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 1, 1999. *178 *179 *180 Nora Vargas-Acosta, Rio Piedras, P.R., Adalina De

ACCEPTED 03-15-00305-CV 5651450 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

644 A.2d 1328 (1994) CONSUMERS UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robert H. SMITH, Robert P. Kogod and Charles E. Smith Management, Inc., Appellees. Nos. 92-CV-1496, 93-CV-16, 93-CV-61, 93-CV-277, 93-CV-280 and 93-CV-726. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 21, 1993. Decided July 14, 1994. *1331</

527 F.Supp. 1252 (1981) Ronald DAWSON, Marlon Lee Hess, James L. Caldwell, William Burton, Garrett Norris, Charles Scott, Chris Dillard and James Martin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Earl G. KENDRICK, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Mercer County, West Virginia; Luther H. Byrd, individually and in his official capacity as Mercer County Commissioner and as representative of all

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

284 F.Supp.2d 511 (2003) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION, Pamela M. Tittle, Thomas O. Padgett, Gary S. Dreadin, Janice Farmer, Linda Bryan, John L. Moore, Betty J. Clark, Shelly Farias, Patrick Campbell, Fanette Perry, Charles Prestwood, Roy Rinard, Steve Lacey, Catherine Stevens, Roger W. Boyce, Wayne M. Stevens, Norman L. and Paula H. Young, Michael L. McCown, and Dan Schultz, on behalf of themselves and a cl

235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36