⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Nickerson v. McFadden”

McFadden v. Blairpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956-08-23 · Published · cited 3× · 304 S.W.2d 93; 42 Tenn. App. 434; 1956 Tenn. App. LEXIS 144
304 S.W.2d 93 (1956) John H. McFADDEN, Jr., et al., Executors and Trustees under the Will of Alexander B. McFadden, Deceased, v. Mrs. Watson K. BLAIR et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section. August 23, 1956. Certiorari Denied June 7, 1957. *94 Armstrong, McCadden, Allen, Braden, & Goodman, Memphis, and Saul, Ewi
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-03-22 · Published · cited 469× · 146 L. Ed. 2d 69; 120 S. Ct. 1135; 529 U.S. 89; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 1895
529 U.S. 89 (2000) UNITED STATES v. LOCKE, GOVERNOR OF WASHINGTON, et al. No. 98-1701. United States Supreme Court. Argued December 7, 1999. Decided March 6, 2000.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *90 *91
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2022-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., GOBEIL and PINSON, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules May 2, 202
State v. Romanpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 634 So. 2d 291; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3060; 1994 WL 106198
PER CURIAM. When Mike Roman was originally sentenced, written reasons were stated for departure from the sentencing guidelines, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll). The State agreed to downward departure, and Roman was placed on community control. He subsequently violated the terms and conditions of community control. However, as in State v. Nickerson, 541 So.2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), when
District Court, E.D. New York · 1990-03-09 · Published · cited 5× · 732 F. Supp. 1254; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2911; 1990 WL 27903
732 F.Supp. 1254 (1990) Beth Ann O'NEILL, an infant by her parent and natural guardian, Richard O'NEILL, and Richard O'Neill, individually, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 89 CV 2756. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 9, 1990. *1255 Irwin H. Berson, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs. A
District Court, E.D. New York · 1990-03-09 · Published · cited 15× · 732 F. Supp. 1248; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2909; 1990 WL 27902
732 F.Supp. 1248 (1990) Brendan EGAN, an infant by his parent and natural guardian, James EGAN, and James Egan, individually, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 89 CV 2755. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 9, 1990. *1249 Irwin H. Berson, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs. Andrew J. Malon
People v. Kurylczykpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 1993-08-20 · Published · cited 260× · 505 N.W.2d 528; 443 Mich. 289
443 Mich. 289 (1993) 505 N.W.2d 528 PEOPLE v. KURYLCZYK Docket No. 91867, (Calendar No. 2). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued January 13, 1993. Decided August 20, 1993. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, Robert J. Nickerson, *292 Pro
Sassower v. Abramspublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1993-09-08 · Published · cited 48× · 833 F. Supp. 253; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12754; 1993 WL 376800
833 F.Supp. 253 (1993) George SASSOWER, Plaintiff, v. ABRAMS, et al., Defendants. George SASSOWER, Plaintiff, v. MEAD DATA CENTRAL, INC., et al., Defendants. George SASSOWER, Plaintiff, v. FELTMAN, et al., Defendants. George SASSOWER, Plaintiff, v. McFADDEN, et al., Defendants. George SASSOWER, Plaintiff, v. BRIEANT, et al., Defendants. Nos. 92 Civ. 8515 (PKL), 92 Civ. 9220 (PK
Foley v. Foleypublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990-02-26 · Published · cited 18× · 572 A.2d 6; 392 Pa. Super. 9; 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 402
*16POPOVICH, Judge, dissenting. While I agree with the implicit holding of the majority that duress may be extrinsic fraud, I reject the majority’s determination that appellant’s actions amounted to extrinsic fraud which precluded a fair hearing or presentation of appellee’s case. Rather, I would find that under the facts before us, viewed in a light most fav
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004-11-01 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded by Supreme Court, January 17, 2006 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL  ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  No. 03-2061 DANIEL G. SCHMIDT III; PRIAG LLC; DGS INVESTMENTS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United St
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995-08-02 · Published · cited 22× · 893 F. Supp. 1162; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11100
893 F.Supp. 1162 (1995) ROADMASTER INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., et. al, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-CV-30095-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 2, 1995. *1163 *1164 C. Brian McDonald, Bulkley, Richardson & Gelinas BayBank Tow
Idaho Supreme Court · 1979-10-02 · Published · cited 2× · 611 P.2d 1009; 101 Idaho 224; 1979 Ida. LEXIS 538
611 P.2d 1009 (1979) 101 Idaho 224 H-K CONTRACTORS, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The CITY OF FIRTH, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 12968. Supreme Court of Idaho. October 2, 1979. Thomas E. Moss of Stout & Moss, Blackfoot, for defendant-appellant. William Charles Carr of Petersen, Moss & Olsen
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000-11-30 · Published · cited 4× · 122 F. Supp. 2d 794; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17348; 2000 WL 1772729
122 F.Supp.2d 794 (2000) MICHIGAN WOLFDOG ASSOCIATION, INC., a not-for-profit Michigan corporation, Cathy Sterling, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. ST. CLAIR COUNTY, Defendant. No. 00-40370. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 30, 2000. *795 *796 Christopher
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995-09-20 · Published · cited 44× · 538 N.W.2d 641; 1995 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 181; 1995 WL 564343
538 N.W.2d 641 (1995) ECONOMY ROOFING & INSULATING CO., Appellant, v. Douglas ZUMARIS, Sharon Dietz, and Roofing Technology, Inc., Appellees. No. 94-575. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 20, 1995. *642 Brian S. Nelson and Stephen T. Fieweger of Katz, McAndrews, Balch, Lefstein, & Fieweger, P.C., Rock Island, Illinois, for
Idaho Supreme Court · 1978-12-13 · Published · cited 15× · 587 P.2d 823; 99 Idaho 682; 1978 Ida. LEXIS 320
SHEPARD, Chief Justice. This appeal is taken from a summary judgment entered against Chief Industries in an action brought by it to foreclose a materialman’s lien. The material facts are not in dispute. In November 1975, defendant-respondent Dean Schwendiman entered into a contract with W & W Sales and Service, Inc., which called for W & W to construct an all-steel building for fertilizer and grai
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004-11-01 · Published · cited 27× · 388 F.3d 414; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22638; 2004 WL 2423812
388 F.3d 414 WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Daniel G. SCHMIDT III; Priag LLC; DGS Investments, INC., Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-2061. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: June 3, 2004. Decided: November 1, 2004. Appeal from the United States
Pierson v. Sewellpublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 1975-08-08 · Published · cited 49× · 539 P.2d 590; 97 Idaho 38; 1975 Ida. LEXIS 357
539 P.2d 590 (1975) 97 Idaho 38 John A. PIERSON, d/b/a Pierson Heating, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Max F. SEWELL and Marian Sewell, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants. No. 11431. Supreme Court of Idaho. August 8, 1975. *592 Lloyd J. Walker, Walker & Kennedy, Twin Falls, for defendants-appellants.
Al-Jundi v. Mancusipublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2000-08-28 · Published · cited 1× · 113 F. Supp. 2d 441; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16006; 2000 WL 1376652
113 F.Supp.2d 441 (2000) Akil AL-JUNDI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Vincent MANCUSI, et al., Defendants. No. 75-CV-132. United States District Court, W.D. New York. August 28, 2000. *442 Ellen Yacknin, Rochester, NY, Brooklyn, NY, Michael Deutsch, Chicago, IL, Dennis Cunningham,
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992-05-11 · Published · cited 15× · 610 A.2d 295; 92 Md. App. 622; 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 109
92 Md. App. 622 (1992) 610 A.2d 295 MARKET TAVERN, INC. v. DANIEL M. BOWEN. No. 1345 September Term, 1991. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 11, 1992. Reconsideration Denied June 30, 1992. George W. Liebmann, Baltimore, for appellant. Barry C. Steel, Towson, for appellee. Argued before MOYLAN, CATHELL an
Glenn v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986-07-15 · Published · cited 39× · 511 A.2d 1110; 68 Md. App. 379; 1986 Md. App. LEXIS 378
68 Md. App. 379 (1986) 511 A.2d 1110 BRITT D. GLENN v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1607, September Term, 1985. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 15, 1986. Certiorari Denied November 5, 1986. Gary Huddles and Peter Max Zimmerman, Towson, for appellant. Richard B. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Stephen H. Sachs, Atty.