⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “No v. CARPENTER, EARL D.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2011-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00243-CV PAMELA KAY CARPENTER AND APPELLANTS JEFFREY SCOTT CARPENTER AND APPELLEES V. ROBERT JOSEPH CARPENTER, APPELLEES DAVID TRENT DEATON, JAMES AND APPELLANTS EARL WARD, EDMOND WAYNE C
Carpenter v. Lemleypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 Ohio 5529
[Cite as Carpenter v. Lemley, 2020-Ohio-5529.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SHAWNTEE CARPENTER JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Hon. Earle E. Wis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 3× · 901 F.3d 1202
TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge. An Oklahoma jury convicted and sentenced Gilbert Ray Postelle to death in connection with the brutal killings of four people. On Memorial Day 2005, Postelle and two other assailants attacked Donnie Swindle at his home, murdering him along with three acquaintances. The raid apparently sprang from the Postelle family's grudge against Mr. Swindle alone; the
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 595 S.W.2d 440; 1980 Mo. App. LEXIS 2452
CRIST, Judge. Marriage dissolution proceeding wherein trial court granted custody of parties’ three year old daughter to husband and denied wife maintenance. Wife appeals and we affirm. The parties were married May 27, 1971, and a daughter, Rachel Lynn, was born to them on November 5, 1974. Shortly thereafter, their marriage began to falter and, eventually, their problems became overwhelming. Husband petitio
District Court, D. Oregon · 1997-11-19 · Published · cited 1× · 985 F. Supp. 1249; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18881; 1997 WL 736485
OPINION AND ORDER FRYE, District Judge. Before the court is the motion of defendant Land O’ Lakes, Inc. for reconsideration of economic damage award (# 124) and the motion of the plaintiffs for reconsideration of noneconomic damages (# 127). BACKGROUND This case was tried to the court from June 10, 1997 through June 20, 1997. The court filed its findings of fac
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2020-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-19-00150-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DARRYL EARL DANIELS, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022-03-14 · Published · cited 4× · 28 F.4th 445
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 20-2268 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EARL LAFAYETTE HALL, III, Appellant _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Distric
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-05-14 · Published · cited 0×
05/14/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 25, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROGER EARL ENGLAND Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 117643 Kyle A. Hixson, Judge ___________________________________
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-12-24 · Published · cited 3× · 2014 Ohio 5698
[Cite as State v. Carpenter, 2014-Ohio-5698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 14CA13 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY CARL V. CARPENTER,
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2016-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 16b0006p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ In re: EARL BENARD BLASINGAME; MARGARET ┐ GOOCH BLASINGAME, │ Debtors. │ │ ________
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2016-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 16b0006p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ In re: EARL BENARD BLASINGAME; MARGARET ┐ GOOCH BLASINGAME, │ Debtors. │ │ ________
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4257 Doc: 97 Filed: 08/14/2026 Pg: 1 of 30 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4257 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EARL LEROY GRIFFIN, JR., Defendant -
District Court, D. Colorado · 1997-04-09 · Published · cited 0× · 960 F. Supp. 243; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4867; 1997 WL 177619
ORDER OF REMAND MILLER, District Judge. Before me is plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand, alleging that removal of this case was procedurally defective because not all served defendants joined in the removal or, alternatively, because the amount in controversy does not exceed the jurisdictional amount. I conclude that the removal faded to meet the joinder requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1446, and, hence, do not reach
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 319 F. Supp. 3d 1272
KENNETH A. MARRA, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Syndicated Office Systems, LLC d/b/a Central Financial Control's ("CFC") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint ("Motion") (DE 29). The Motion is fully briefed. (DE 33, 37.) The Court has considered the Motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-11-27 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 27 2019, 9:02 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of
Com. v. Pacheco, D.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-01-24 · Published · cited 36× · 227 A.3d 358; 2020 Pa. Super. 14
J-A09011-19 2020 PA Super 14 COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : DAVID PACHECO,
Com. v. Pacheco, D.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-01-24 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 Pa. Super. 14
J-A09011-19 2020 PA Super 14 COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : DAVID PACHECO,
Com. v. Pacheco, D.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
J-A09011-19 2019 PA Super 208 COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PENNSYLVANIA : OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : DAVID PACHECO,
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007-08-03 · Published · cited 1× · 2007 Ohio 3947
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} This case is before the court on appeal from the June 6, 2006 judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas which classified appellant, Robert Carpenter, as a sexual predator. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court. {¶ 2} The relevant facts are as follows. In 1981, following a jury trial, the trial court found