Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 21 2018, 10:18 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals

PYLE, J. Affirmed. VAIDIK, C.J., Concurs. BARNES, Sr.J., Concurs.

By Judge David W. Lannetti Today the Court rules on the motion filed by Defendant Jevon Glenn Augustus, Sr., seeking to suppress evidence discovered during a vehicular stop and subsequent custodial search (the “Motion To Suppress”). The issues before the Court are: (1) whether there was reasonable, articulable suspicion that Augustus had been involved in a drug transaction to support an investigatory detention; (2) whether e

Cuéllar, J. We granted review to address two related issues: whether employers are required to permit their employees to take off-duty rest periods under Labor Code section 226.7 and Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage order No. 4-2001 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040 (Wage Order 4)), and whether employers may require their employees to remain "on call" during rest periods. What

The appellant, Johnson Augustus Powell, was convicted of one count of unlawful transport of articles containing sounds transferred without the consent of the owner, a violation of § 13A-8-81(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975. The trial court sentenced *Page 2 Powell to three years' imprisonment. The trial court also ordered Powell to pay a $15,000 fine, $1,750 in restitution each to the Recording Industry Association of Amer

PRESIDING JUSTICE COOK, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Plaintiffs were injured in an automobile accident on April 14, 1992. The two-year personal injury statute of limitations was to expire April 14, 1994, but on March 21, 1994, plaintiffs filed their complaint against defendants Gene Somers and

POLEN, J. K.M.B., a child, appeals the final judgment of delinquency, finding him guilty of resisting arrest without violence and trespass after warning. The trial court withheld adjudication, gave K.M.B. a stern judicial warning, and required him to complete twenty-five hours of community service and an online anger management course. We reverse the withhold of adjudication as to the trespass but affirm as to the resisting ar

WESLEY, Circuit Judge. Congress has delegated exclusive authority over broadcasting licensure matters to the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”). That authority includes wide discretion in granting, revoking, conditioning, and extending licenses in furtherance of the public interest. This case arises in part because of the FCC’s inordinate delay in exercising t

ELIZABETH G. AUGUSTUS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.Augustus v. CommissionerDocket No. 96061.United States Board of Tax Appeals

487 F.Supp. 156 (1979) B. V. BUREAU WIJSMULLER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America as Owner of the Warship JULIUS A. FURER, Defendant. No. 76 Civ. 2494-CSH. United States District Court, S. D. New York. September 20, 1979. *157 *158 Healy & Baillie, New York City, for plaintiff; John P

RIVES, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from a judgment modifying and approving what was proposed as a plan for the desegregation of the public schools operated under the supervision of The Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, Florida. Pensacola is the County’s largest city. The school population of the County totals approxi

22 F.3d 113 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,183, 28 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1050 PACIFIC DUNLOP HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, a Delawarecorporation, Plaintiff,v.Robert F. BAROSH, Francis X. Beaudette, Stanley N. Gaines,et al., Defendants-Third PartyPlaintiffs-Counterdefendants-Appellees,v.PACIFIC DUNLOP GNB CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, andGNB Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, ThirdParty Defendant

536 F.3d 68 (2008) AMERICAN STEEL ERECTORS, INC., Ajax Construction Co., American Aerial Services, Inc., Bedford Ironworks, Inc., and D.F.M. Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 7, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERS, Defendant, Appellee. No. 07-1832. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. He

118 F.2d 38 (1941) AUGUSTUS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 8586. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. February 14, 1941. Writ of Certiorari Denied May 26, 1941. *39 Erwin N. Griswold, of Cambridge, Mass. (Orville Smith, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Erwin N. Griswold, of Cambridge, Mass., on the brief), f

480 F.Supp.2d 471 (2007) AMERICAN STEEL ERECTORS, INC. et al. v. LOCAL UNION NO. 7, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERS. Civil Action No. 04-12536-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 30, 2007. *472 Carol Chandler, Geoffrey R. Bok, Stoneman, Chandler &am;

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

212 F.Supp. 482 (1962) Joanna Gwin Clow CLAYTON and Joanna Gwin Clow, a minor, by Hugh A. Clayton, her next friend, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES B. CLOW & SONS, a corporation et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 55 C 944. United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D. December 10, 1962. *483 *484 L

SHOYER, J., — On September 4, 1974, the Glenmede Trust Company (“Glenmede”) filed its petition with this court, asking for a declaration of its rights and responsibilities in connec*631tion with the sale of 5,564,357 shares of the common stock of General Crude Oil Company (“General Crude”), pursuant to an allegedly conditional contract which it had entered into

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a final decree awarding the plaintiff profits arising from sales of stencil sheets by the defendant which were held to have infringed U. S. Letters Patent No. 1,526,982. Claims 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 16, 18, 21 and 22 of the patent were held valid and infringed in an interlocutory decree granted by Judge Patterson. A master was appointed to ascertain and report defendant’s

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: The law of salvage is a concept with roots deeply embedded in antiquity. We are called upon to apply this old and venerable law to a case involving modern shipping. On this appeal we review the propriety of a $500,000 award for salvage services to which the United States District Court for the Southern Distri