Cases

*134Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. I agree with Mr. Justice Baer’s conclusion that the trial court violated Rule of Criminal Procedure 631. See Concurring Opinion, at 130-31,104 A.3d at 1175. That being the case, and as Appellant preserved this meritorious claim of trial court error, the appropriate inquiry implicates a harmless error analysis, for

[J-64-2013][M.O. – Stevens, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 23 EAP 2013 : Appellee : Appeal from the Judgment of Superior : Court entered on 9/11/12 at No. 1336 v. : EDA 2010, af

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 123 MM 2018 : Respondent : : : v. : : : NOEL BROWN,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 10 MM 2018 : Respondent : : : v. : : : NOEL B

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT NOEL BROWN, : No. 60 MAP 2022 Appellant : v. : . : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : AND ERIC TICE, SUPERINTENDENT : SCI-SOMERSET, : Appellees : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 285 MAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2372 In these consolidated cases, we decide whether the Government created lawful exemptions from a regulatory requirement implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA),

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Cheryl Williams, an African-American woman, claims that she was subjected to constant harassment at the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (the “Commission”) by her supervisors, Joseph Retort and Adam Stalczynski. As a result of this treatment, she alleges she faced a hostile work environment and was ultimat

David Newbern, Justice, concurring in part; dissenting in part. In various oral and written motions filed prior to trial, Mr. Noel sought to exclude or limit the admission of victim-impact evidence during the sentencing phase of his trial. He argued that the sentencing phase is devoted only to the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances and that victim-impact

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT NOEL BROWN, : No. 557 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court

OPINION BY McLAUGHLIN, J.: Appellant Carl Gould was charged with numerous drug-related charges, including three counts of possession with intent to deliver,1 after State Police executed a search warrant on a car they had observed Gould driving and seized five bundles of heroin and 34 plastic bags of cocaine, as well as documentation linking Gould to the vehicle.2 The troopers

OPINION BY' OLSON, J. Appellant, John Yocolano, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on April 21, 2015, following his jury trial convictions for three counts of indecent assault, two counts of sexual assault, and one count each of rape, kidnapping, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (IDSI), aggravated assault, simple assault, unlawful restraint

OPINION BY MOULTON, J.: John Lewis Rush appeals from the March 10, 2015 judgment of sentence entered in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas following his convictions of four counts of aggravated assault and one count each of disarming a law enforcement officer; torture of a police animal; cruelty to animals; resisting arrest; escape; possession

NEALON, J., — Defendant has filed post-sentence motions seeking a judgment of acquittal, an arrest of judgment and a new trial following his convictions and sentencing for first-degree murder as an accomplice and criminal conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. *456Defendant seeks a judgment of acquittal due to the alleged insufficiency of the evidence, and alte

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PER CURIAM. Plaintiff voters from various counties of the Commonwealth of Kentucky claim that mal apportionment of the state’s legislative electoral districts has unconstitutionally diluted their voting power. [R. 67]. These Plaintiffs seek summary judgment declaring that the current Kentucky House and Senate districts violate the “one person, one vote” guarantee of the Fourtee

OPINION Justice GREENSPAN. This is a direct appeal from the imposition of a sentence of death by the Court of Common Pleas of York County, in which *396Appellant Milton Montalvo raises thirty-seven (37) issues for our review. We affirm. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY The record shows that in April of

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCOTT. I. Introduction William Harry Meece (Meece) appeals from the judgment of the Warren Circuit Court sentencing him to consecutive twenty-year terms of confinement (for a total of forty years) on two convictions of robbery and burglary, both of the first degree, and to death for each of three convictions for murder. Accord

OPINION Justice CASTILLE. In the case sub judice, we are asked to decide whether Section 6312(d) of the statute governing possession of child pornography, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d), is unconstitutionally vague and/or overbroad. Additionally before this Court are the following questions: (1) Did the General Assembly intend that a person charged under Section 6312(d) be subjected to individual cou

OPINION PER CURIAM: For the third time, we are called upon to assess the legality of the President’s efforts to bar over 150 million nationals of six designated countries 1 from entering the United States or being issued immigrant visas that they w

790 So.2d 389 (2000) Darnell L. BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. SC95844. Supreme Court of Florida. October 5, 2000. Rehearing Denied May 31, 2001. James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella and Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Public Defenders, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner. Robert A