Cases

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-0220 _____________________________ JOSEPH DAVID DAVIS, Appellant, v. LINDSEY TAYLOR NOLEN, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Stephen A. Pitre, Judge. April 18, 2024 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LEWIS, RAY

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant John Nolen filed this lawsuit on behalf of a class of similarly situated cable subscribers against Nucen-trix Broadband Networks, Inc., various other related corporations, subsidiaries, and individual directors named in Nolen’s notice of appeal (collectively, “Nucentrix”) for violations of the Federal Racketeer Influenced and C

ROTHENBERG, J. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. (“Truly Nolen”) appeals a trial court order finding that it waived its right to compel arbitration by filing a motion to transfer venue based on forum non conveniens while simultaneously filing a motion to compel arbitration. Because the actions taken by Truly Nolen were not inconsistent with its right to enforce the mandatory arbitrat

NOLEN v. STATE Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us e-

[Cite as State v. Nolen, 2020-Ohio-118.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 19CA3873 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY STEVEN A. NOLEN

99 F.Supp.2d 953 (2000) Michael S. NOLEN, Plaintiff, v. SOUTH BEND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION and Ryder/Ate, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:99CV142 AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. April 7, 2000. *954 *955 Georgia C. Luks-McFarland, South Bend, IN, John C. H

Ness, Justice. Respondent Littlejohn brought this action seeking to be removed from habitual offender status. Appellant Highway Department contends the trial court lacked authority to grant the requested relief. We agree and reverse. Respondent was declared an habitual traffic offender in July 1977 under the Habitual Offender Act, S. C. Code Ann. §§ 56-1-1010 to 56-1-1130 (1976), and ordered not to drive f

536 F.3d 834 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kenneth NOLEN, Appellant. No. 07-3887. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 9, 2008. Filed: August 4, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 29, 2008. *836 Leslie Jane Borgognoni, argued, Little Rock, AR, for appellant.<

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3887 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

Opinion HALLER, J. Alvaro Miranda and Danny Luna filed a class action complaint against Truly Nolen of America (Truly Nolen) alleging violations of California’s wage and hour laws. Truly Nolen moved to compel arbitration of the claims under arbitration agreements signed by the parties and requested that the court order plaintiffs to arbitrate on an individual and not a class basis. The arbitration agreements d

Under Act 987 of September 12, 1969, § 10 reads: "The decisions of the supreme court shall govern the holdings and decisions of the courts of appeals, and the decisions and proceedings of such courts of appeals shall be subject to the general superintendence and control of the supreme court as provided by section 140 of the Constitution of the state." Nevertheless, § 34 of the same Act repealed Code 1940, T. 13, § 95, doubtless the source of thi

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-1688 JAMES R. SNYDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK T. NOLEN, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

ORDER Tracy Hertel, a former Indiana prisoner, sued the warden and property manag*959er at St. Joseph County Jail after legal materials he had brought there were confiscated and then either lost or destroyed. The district court concluded that no jury could find that Hertel suffered an actual injury from the loss of his documents, and granted summary judgment sua sponte for the

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I join the Per Curiam opinion. That joint opinion leaves off at the question *292whether a clerk’s failure to file a complaint violates the due process clause by denying the plaintiff “access” to the courts. Nolen returned Snyder’s complaint; this was a mistake as a matter

453 S.E.2d 220 (1995) 117 N.C. App. 693 In re Curtis Brown NOLEN, Born December 23, 1985; Carolyn Brandi Nolen, Born August 4, 1987. No. 9417DC93. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 7, 1995. *222 J. Tyrone Browder, P.A. by John L. McGrath, King, for petitioner-appellee Stokes County Department of Social

592 N.E.2d 1151 (1992) 228 Ill. App.3d 424 170 Ill.Dec. 471 Michael FERNANDES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sam W. NOLEN and Terry Gainer, as substitute defendants for Jeremy Margolis, Defendants-Appellants. No. 3-91-0373. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. May 6, 1992. *1152 De

535 Pa. 77 (1993) 634 A.2d 192 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Christopher NOLEN, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 8, 1992. Decided November 22, 1993. *80 George F. Schultz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Julia Feld, York, William T. Tully, Asst. Dist. Atty., Ha

65 B.R. 1014 (1986) In re Jimmie Juan NOLEN and Dolores Rose Nolen, Debtors. Robert WALDMAN, Plaintiff, v. Jimmie Juan NOLEN and Dolores Rose Nolen, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 7-86-00791 R R, Adv. No. 86-0256 R. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico. October 27, 1986. Max Houston Proctor, Hobbs, N.M., for debtor. Robert Waldman, Albuquerque, N.M.,

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Ernest Nolen applied for disability insurance benefits in 1986, claiming that he was disabled before his insured status expired in 1985. After a hearing, the administrative law judge (AU) concluded that Nolen could have returned to his previous job at the end of his insured status. The Appeals Council denied Nolen’s petition for review, and the district co

518 F.Supp.2d 1031 (2007) Charles W. LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. Michael ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 06 C 6639. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 11, 2007. *1032 Barry Alan Schultz, Law Offices of Barry Schultz, Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff. Samuel D. Brooks, AUSA-SS