Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nu Wave Auto Sales, LLC”
USA Nutraceuticals Group, Inc. v. BPI Sports, LLCpublic domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause is before the Court upon Defendants, BPI Sports, LLC and BPI Sports Holdings, LLC’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. [48] (“Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, all supporting and opposing filings, the record in this case, and convened the parties for oral argument on February 18, 2016 i
Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Joan B. Gottschall, United States District Judge Before the court are cross motions-for partial summary judgment and a motion:to dismiss two antitrust counterclaims pleaded in the defendants’ amended answer. The motions for summary judgment primarily involve a contract formation dispute with an antecedent choice-of-law question. Finding that the United Nations Convention on Co
Smith v. McDiarmidpublic domain
[Cite as Smith v. McDiarmid, 2022-Ohio-2151.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Robbie Smith, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 21AP-199 (C.P.C. No. 17CV-3704) v. : (REGU
ACCEPTED 14-14-00755-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/3/2015 10:49:47 PM
Lockhill Ventures, LLC v. Ard Mor, Inc., Texas Ardmor Properties, LP, and Texas Ardmore Management, LLCpublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-14-00796-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/6/2015 12:26:43 PM NO. 04-14-00796
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
Standard Iron Works v. ArcelorMittalpublic domain
639 F.Supp.2d 877 (2009) STANDARD IRON WORKS, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ARCELORMITTAL; ArcelorMittal USA, Inc.; United States Steel Corporation; Nucor Corporation; Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; AK Steel Holding Corporation; Ssab Swedish Steel Corporation; Commercial Metals, Inc., Defendants. No. 08 C 5214. United States District Court,
Labauve v. Olin Corp.public domain
ORDER STEELE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (doc. 119). *637The Motion has been exhaustively litigated, as the parties have submitted more than 200 pages of briefs and over 800 exhibits in support of their respective positions. The parties also presented live testimony and argument in
Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.public domain
*543MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACKSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Decertify the Class Action filed on March 6, 2000, and Motion to Reject Trial Plan filed March 14, 2000. Plaintiffs’ consolidated Memorandum in Opposition was received on March 24, 2000. Defendant’s Amended Reply was received on April 4,
in Re State of Texaspublic domain
FILED 15-0135 5/13/2015 3:31:19 PM tex-5271831 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER and JUDGMENT WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. [[Image here]] *14[[Image here]] *15[[Image here]] I.Introduction This case involves claims by Vietnamese nationals and an organization, The Vietnamese
In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigationpublic domain
490 F.Supp.2d 381 (2007) In re OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mylan Laboratories Inc., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Laboratorios Dr. Esteve, S.A., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lek Pharmaceutical and Chemical Co., D.D., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Apotex Corp., et al., Defendants.<
AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Laboratories Inc.public domain
Opinion & Order BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge. *387TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. CO CO o I. The Parties. CO CO o II. The Patents-In-Suit. 03 05 CO A. Patent Ownership. CO CO III. The Pleadings. CO CO A. Complaint Against Mylan/Esteve.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
222 F.Supp.2d 423 (2002) ASTRA AKTIEBOLAG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cheminor Drugs, Ltd., et al., Defendants. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Genpharm Inc., Defendant. Astra Aktiebolag, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kremers Urban Development Co., et al., Defendants. In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation. No.
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
Harry Bizios v. Town of Lakewood Village, Texaspublic domain
2nd Court of Appeals Docket Sheet Case Number: 02-14-00143-CV Date Filed: 05/07/2014 9:14AM Style: Appellant Harry Bizios v.Appellee Town of Lakewood Village, Texas
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM