Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Null v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company”
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA and PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., Appellees. ____________ No. 4D18-2616 __________________________________ PHILIP MORRIS US
Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.public domain
(2008) Bernice BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., etc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:07-cv-00761-J-25HTS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. August 28, 2008. ORDER HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, District Judge. This matter arises out of a class action involving approximately 700,000 citiz
OPINION OF THE COURT Tom, J. The issue on appeal is whether a corporate taxing provision of the New York City Administrative Code that disallows a depreciation deduction for a corporation’s property placed in service out of New York, while allowing such a deduction for property located within New York, confers preferential tax treatment upon local businesses, concomitantly discriminating against out-of-State pr
In Re the Appeal of R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.public domain
326 S.E.2d 911 (1985) In the Matter of the Appeal of R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY from the Denials of Its Claims for Exemption by Durham County and Forsyth County for 1983. No. 8410PTC481. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 19, 1985. *912 Horton, Hendrick & Kummer by Thomas L. Kummer and John A. Cocklereece, Jr., Winston-Sale
513 F.Supp. 726 (1981) ISLAND TOBACCO CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. R. J. REYNOLDS INDUSTRIES, INC., R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Hawaii), Defendants. Civ. No. 78-0088. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. April 21, 1981. As Amended August 25, 1981. *727 *72
State v. the American Tobacco Companypublic domain
I respectfully dissent from the reversal of the attorney fee judgment entered by the trial court. My rationale consists of three elements. First, the contingency fee contract is legal, valid, binding, and not void. Second, the record supports the conclusion that, but for the services and participation of "James's attorneys," the tobacco defendants would have escaped liability to the State of Alabama entirely and would have avoided the payment of any compensation or settlement proceeds
In Re Hood Ex Rel. State Tobacco Litigationpublic domain
958 So.2d 790 (2007) In re Jim HOOD, Attorney General, ex rel., STATE of Mississippi TOBACCO LITIGATION. The Partnership for a Healthy Mississippi, Intervenor, v. State of Mississippi, by and Through Governor Haley Barbour, The Mississippi Division of Medicaid in the Office of the Governor, and The Mississippi Health Care Trust Fund. No. 2006-SA-01088-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Glass v. Kellogg Co. Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers Pension Planpublic domain
*368 Order PAUL L. ’MALONEY, Chief District Judge. Denying As Moot Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Original Complaint This is an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). In April 2008, plaintiff Linda Glass (“Glass”) filed the original complaint, and defendant The Kellogg Company Bakery, Confe
ACCEPTED 03-14-00661-CV 4248396 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Reynolds v. Alabama Department of Transportationpublic domain
996 F.Supp. 1156 (1998) Johnny REYNOLDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 85-T-665-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 18, 1998. *1157 *1158 Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., Ann K. Wiggins, Russell W. A
San Ann Tobacco Company v. Hammpublic domain
*399MERRILL, Justice. This case was originally assigned to another member of the court and was reassigned to the author of this opinion on July 29, 1968. This appeal is from a decree holding the Alabama Unfair Cigarette Sales Act, as amended, constitutional and denying the relief sought by complainants and appellants, San Ann Tobacco Company, Inc., he
Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agencypublic domain
4 F.Supp.2d 435 (1998) FLUE-CURED TOBACCO COOPERATIVE STABILIZATION CORPORATION, The Council for Burley Tobacco, Inc., Universal Leaf Tobacco Company, Incorporated, Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, and Gallins Vending Company, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and Carol Browner, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants. No. 6:93CV00370.
Reynolds v. Reynoldspublic domain
Head, Presiding Justice. The present case began with the filing of a petition for divorce by the husband, with a subsequent response by the wife seeking alimony. The bill of excep*235tions contains 128 pages. A motion to dismiss certain assignments of error was filed which contains 12 pages, and a brief in support thereof. The transcript (pleadings, evidence, amended moti
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Demerath Land Company (“Demerath”) appeals from the district court’s 1 order granting summary judgment in favor of Steve Sparr, Eugene Boes, and Farmers Cooperative Exchange (“Farmers Coop”) on Demerath’s civil racketeering claims. We affirm. I. F
Reynolds v. . Trust Co.public domain
The following judgment was rendered by the court below: "This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing to the court that summons was issued herein on 9 June, 1930, and that service of the summons and a copy of the complaint was accepted by all of the defendants except the defendants Anne Cannon Reynolds, Louise Reynolds, William N. Reynolds (minor), Nancy Reynolds Bagley (minor), J. Edward Johnston, Jr. (minor), and Zachary Smith Reynolds (minor), but that said defendants have bee
Peter Hauptmann Tobacco Co. v. Unverferthpublic domain
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. The judgment of the circuit court was there affirmed and the case was certified here asStatement. being contrary to a previous decision of the Springfield Court of Appeals in the case of Lively v. Munal-Jones Lumber Company, 194 S.W. 741. The opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals was by REYNOLDS, P.J., and was reported in 207 S.W. at page 283. We content ourselves with making
Reynolds v. Palmerpublic domain
Dick, J., (charging jury.) This is an important case to the parties on account of the amount of money involved. It is an interesting one to the persons who have iieard the trial, as the evidence and the *434legal questions presented are connected with the cultivation, curing, handling, the preparation for market, the sale, and manufacture of tobacco, a very impor
Reynolds v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimorepublic domain
Olakkson, J. Richard Joshua Reynolds, of Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, N. 0., died in August, 1918, leaving a last will and testament, codicil and nuncupative will, which said instruments were duly admitted to probate in said county in August, 1918, and recorded in office of the clerk of the Superior Court of said county in Book 8 of Wills, p. 91, etc. At his death Richard Joshua Reynolds left surviving him hi
424 F.3d 1118 State of ALABAMA, Plaintiff-Appellee,State of Florida, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee,v.UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Robert B. Keyser, Colonel, in his capacity as District Engineer, Mobile District, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Randall R. Castro, Major General, in his capacity as Division Engineer, South Atlantic Division, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Robert B. Flowers, Lt. General, in his capa
NAIFEH v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:NAIFEH v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets