Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Number 14 B.V. v. Analog Devices, Inc.”
Opinion Numberpublic domain
Dear Mr. Heck: This Office is in receipt of your opinion request, authorized by the State Mineral Board, in which you ask the following questions: 1) Can the State of Louisiana regulate or permit a hydrokinetic electricity project on the Mississippi River within the State's borders? *Page 2 2) Would State Agencies, and if so, which State Agencies, be involved in the permitting and regulating process of such hydrokinetic electricity pr
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5151-17 A-1083-18 ELIZABETH HRYMOC and TADEUSZ HRYMOC, Plaintiffs-Respondents, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v. AS REDACTED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5151-17 A-1083-18 ELIZABETH HRYMOC and TADEUSZ HRYMOC, Plaintiffs-Respondents, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v. AS REDACTED
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to enjoin the use of arbitrary government action that benefits private commercial interests and developers within Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen City of Houston, Texas (“TIRZ117”) at the expense of substantial
United States v. Juror Number Onepublic domain
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The issue before the Court involves juror misconduct by unauthorized use of emails during deliberations in a criminal trial. After being dismissed, Juror Number One disobeyed the Court’s orders and discussed via e-mail with other jurors her opinion on the Defendant’s guilt. Juror Number One’s conduct led to the dismissal of
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–1915 Filed June 30, 2015 Amended September 14, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JESSE MICHAEL GASKINS, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Henry W. Latham II (motion to suppress), and John D. Telleen, Judges. A criminal defendant appeals his convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to delive
573 F.Supp.2d 221 (2008) NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE, Plaintiff, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1384. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 4, 2008. *223 Christian J. Ward, Gregory S. Coleman, Yetter & War
Supreme Court No. 2022-74-Appeal. (PC 20-7250) (Concurrence and Dissent begin on Page 42) Kevin Bennett et al. : v. : Angela Steliga, individually and : personally and as Trustee of The Angela
Supreme Court No. 2022-74-Appeal. (PC 20-7250) (Concurrence and Dissent begin on Page 42) Kevin Bennett et al. : v. : Angela Steliga, individually and : personally and as Trustee of The Angela
United States v. One Palmetto State Armory PA-15 Machinegun Receiver/Frame, Unknown Caliber, Serial Number LW001804public domain
MEMORANDUM DALZELL, District Judge. I. Introduction Ryan S. Watson applied to the ATF to make and possess a machine gun2, but his application was ultimately denied for violating several Federal statutes. He therefore brings this action for declarative and injunctive relief, claiming that 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), 26 U.S.C. § 5801 et s
U.S. Information Systems, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union Number 3public domain
313 F.Supp.2d 213 (2004) U.S. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Odyssey Group, Inc. and Blue Diamond Fiber Optic Networks, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NUMBER 3, AFL-CIO, A R Communication Contractors Inc., Adco Electrical Corporation, Five Star Electric Corporation, Forest Electric Corporation, Hugh O'Kane Electric Company LLC, IPC Communications, Inc. and Nead Information Systems, Defendants.
904 F.Supp. 622 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ONE DLO MODEL A/C, 30.06 MACHINE GUN, SERIAL NUMBER 86-70056, et. al., Defendants. No. 5:93 CV 2306. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 1, 1995. *623 Lynne H. Buck, James L. Morford, Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, for plaint
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquistpublic domain
338 N.W.2d 560 (1983) AFSCME COUNCILS 6, 14, 65 AND 96, AFL-CIO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Barbara L. SUNDQUIST, Commissioner of Employee Relations; Allen Rudell, Commissioner of Finance; and the State of Minnesota, Defendants-Respondents, and The Minneapolis Police Relief Association; the Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Association; the Minnesota Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO; the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association; the Min
147 F.3d 1344 47 ERC 1353, 1998 A.M.C. 2409, 29Envtl. L. Rep. 20,139,23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1690 BOUCHARD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC., for exoneration fromor limitation of liability as owner or as owner pro hoc viceof Tug Capt. Fred Bouchard and Barge B. No. 155, Tug CaptainFred Bouchard Corporation, for exoneration from orlimitation of liability as owner or as owner pro hac vice ofTug Cap
CLARK, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals are taken from the district court’s denial of two petitions for leave to intervene under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court held that the requests were untimely. We reverse. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
563 F.2d 66 15 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1735, 14 Empl. Prac.Dec. P 7760Carol J. WALTON, on behalf of herself and on behalf ofothers similarly situatedv.EATON CORPORATION.Carol J. WALTON, Appellant,v.EATON CORPORATION. No. 76-1707. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Jan. 10, 1977.Submitted for Rehearing In Banc under Third
309 F.2d 248 Peter CALAGAZ, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Members ofMarine Engineers' Beneficial Association No. 14,AFL-CIO, Mobile, Alabama, Appellant,v.Jesse M. CALHOON and Julius Dembicki, Appellees.Peter CALAGAZ, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Members ofMarine Engineers' Beneficial Association No. 14,AFL-CIO, Mobile, Alabama, Appellant,v.W. G. KELLOGG, Individually, as Agent, etc., et al., Appellees.
UNIBRIDGE SYSTEMS, INC. v. PATTERSONpublic domain
JERRY L. GOODMAN, JUDGE: ¶ 1 Unibridge Systems, Inc. (Unibridge) appeals a November 13, 2015, trial court order which affirmed the decision of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) denying Unibridge’s protest of a bid awarded to Cardinal Scale Manufacturing (Cardinal). Based upon our review of the facts and applicable law, we affirm. FACTS AND
NYE v. BNSF RAILWAY CO.public domain
COLBERT, J. ¶1 This is a wrongful death action arising from a fatal vehicle/train collision at the County Road 1660 railroad crossing in Pontotoc County. The appellant, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad Company (BNSF), appeals from the underlying judgment on a jury's verdict in favor of the appellee, Juanita Nye, in her capacity as the wife of Jeffrey Nye, the decedent, and th
KEVIN R. ANDERSON, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge *875I. INTRODUCTION. This case involves whether an exculpatory clause in a contract shields an inspector from over $1 million in liability arising from a failure to identify a flaw in the design and construction of high-pressure tanker trailers that resulted in a purely economic injury