Cases

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM ** Onecimo Nunez-Rodriguez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 *660(1967), Nune

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 97-1669 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JOSE ANTONIO NUNEZ-RODRIG

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 95-1887 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOS ANTONIO NU EZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant, Appellant.

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 95-1887 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

CYR, Circuit Judge. Appellant José Antonio Nuñez-Rodriguez (“Núñez”) challenges the life sentence imposed upon him for “carjacking”, see 18 U.S.C. § 2119(3), and the consecutive five-year sentence imposed for using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, see id. § 924(c)(1), § 2. We vacate the district court judgment and remand for fu

536 U.S. 970 NUNEZ-RODRIGUEZ, AKA DIAZv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-10456. Supreme Court of the United States. June 28, 2002. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 28 Fed. Appx. 340.

540 U.S. 932 NUNEZ-OZUNA, AKA SANCHEZ-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-5944. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied.

535 U.S. 976 RODRIGUEZ-NUNEZv.UNITED STATES; andHERNANDEZ-GARCIAv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-8515. Supreme Court of the United States. April 1, 2002. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 275 F. 3d 1082 (first judgment) and 1083 (second judgment

LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge. Disposition of this appeal turns on the response given by the trial court to an inquiry from the jury during deliberations in a criminal case. The court refused to answer two written questions, but reread its earlier instructions on the law of conspiracy. We conclude that the court erred in failing to answer the questions, and that the error was har

SUMMARY ORDER Co-defendants-appellants Manuel Geral-do, Hargelis Vargas, and Jugo Cespedes (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from sentences and final judgments of conviction entered on October 30, 2015, November 25, 2015, and December 3, 2015, respectively, each by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history,

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Daniel Fernandez and Jose Betancourt appeal from convictions for conspiring to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vii), 846. Fernandez, who stands convicted after a jury trial, argues on appeal that (1) the district court erred in denying him a mistrial, (2) the district court’s multiple conspiracy jury charge was erroneous, (3) there was a prejudicia

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

12-1214-cr United States v. Rodriguez UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2012 (Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: May 15, 2013) Docket No. 12-1214-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

560 F.3d 62 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julio Carrion SANTIAGO, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Pedro Miranda, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Juan Nunez, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Jose O. Rodriguez, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 07-1575, 07-1718, 07-1728, 07-2017. <