Cases

229 F.2d 413 WESTERN SPRING SERVICE CO., Inc., a corporation, J. A.Hingley Machine Company, a partnership, J. A. HingleyMachine Company Trust, a business trust, Cecil D. Hingley,Ernest A. Hingley, Josephine M. Hingley, Nell M. Hingley andAlice M. Hingley, Appellants,v.Merrill ANDREW, Appellee.WESTERN SPRING SERVICE CO., Inc., a corporation, J. A.Hingley Machine Company, a partnership, J. A. HingleyMachine Company

638 F.2d 283 Neil LEIST, Philip Smith and Incomco, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.John Richard SIMPLOT, J. R. Simplot & Co., Simplot ProductsCo., Inc., Simplot Industries, Inc., Simtag Farms, Inc.,Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares & Co., Henry A. Pollack,Harvey B. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack Company, GeraldRafferty, Pressner Trading Corp., Benjamin Pressner, StephenSundheimer, Jules Nordlight, Edelstein & Co., Inc.,

July 1 2015 DA 14-0113 Case Number: DA 14-0113 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MT 192 MASTERS GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellee, v. COMERICA BANK, Third-Party De

635 F.Supp.2d 948 (2009) Teresa ROBERTS, Colleen Sanders and Deanna Schliske, Plaintiffs, v. USCC Payroll Corporation and Bonnie Hruska, Defendants. No. C07-3071-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 17, 2009. *950 Thomas Andrew Newkirk, Newkirk Law Firm PLC, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff. Ad

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta

13‐981 (L) Turkmen, et al. v. Hasty, et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 5 August Term, 2013 6 7 (Argued: May 1, 2014 Decided: June 17, 2015) 8

137 Ill.2d 558 (1990) 560 N.E.2d 594 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. PAUL WEST, Appellant. No. 65382. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed May 30, 1990. Rehearing denied October 1, 1990. *559 *560 *561

258 B.R. 405 (2001) In re Marilyn M. MOSS, a/k/a Marilyn Margaret Bryant, a/k/a Marilyn Moss Bryant, a/k/a M. Margaret Bryant, a/k/a Marilyn Wall Bryant, a/k/a Marilyn Whitman Bryant, a/k/a Margaret ("Peggy") Whitman, a/k/a Margaret ("Peggy") Whitman Bryant, a/k/a Margaret Bryant, a/k/a Marge Bryant, a/k/a Mari Bryant, a/k/a Mary Bryant, a/k/a Anne Bryant, a/k/a Ann Whitman, a/k/a P.M. Whitman, a/k/a Ann Margaret Whitman, a/k/a Anne Margaret Whitman, a/k

507 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2006) Barry W. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF the BIRMINGHAM DISTRICT, Defendant. No. 2:01-CV-2038-RDP. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 24, 2006. *1241 *1242 *1243

Per curiam. The plaintiffs in these four consolidated cases challenge the constitutionality of certain provisions of RSA 281:12, II (Supp. 1983), a part of the workers’ compensation law. That paragraph bars actions for non-intentional torts by an employee or his personal or legal representatives against “any officer, director, agent, servant or employee” of his employer for personal injury, as defined in RSA 281:2, V (Supp. 1983)

ACCEPTED 04-14-00735-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/20/2015 1:49:45 PM

9 A.3d 882 (2010) 204 N.J. 320 Lula M. HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; Hon. Clark E. Bruno, Acting Commissioner of Human Services; Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital; Gregory P. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer for Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital, Defendants-Respondents. A-69 September Term 2009. Supreme Court of New Jersey.

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

*844 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ COLLECTIVE MOTION TO DISMISS INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS MARIANNE O. BATTANI, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Collective Motion to Dismiss End-Payor Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (Doe. No. 73 in 12-503), and Automobile Dealer Pla

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs in three consolidated actions in the District Court for the Southern District of New York appeal from an order of Judge, now Chief Judge, MacMahon, 470 F.Supp. 1256 (1979), granting appellees’ motions for partial summary judgment. The court struck from the complaints all claims based on the Commodity Exchange Act, (CEA), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-19, as amended in 1974, as distinguished from other cla

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. Both of these cases were actions in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, to recover damages because of personal injuries suffered by the plaintiffs. In Number 5107, appellee, Merrill Andrew, was plaintiff, and in Number 5108, appellee, Catherine Andrew, was plaintiff. The two cases were consolidated for trial in the court below and are likewise consolidated on appeal. Referenc