Cases

499 So.2d 602 (1986) George T. OUBRE v. BANK OF ST. CHARLES AND TRUST COMPANY. No. 86-CA-285. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. December 8, 1986. Rehearing Denied January 16, 1987. Writ Denied March 13, 1987. *603 Herman Hoffmann, Jr., Attorney at Law, New Orleans, for Bank of St. Char

67 So.3d 1294 (2011) Lauren Lee MOFFETT v. Scott Brame MOFFETT. No. 10-1365. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. June 22, 2011. Evelyn M. Oubre, Attorney at Law, Lake Charles, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, Lauren Lee Moffett. John Green, AAA Legal Services, Inc., Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Scott Brame Moffett. Court composed of S

67 So.3d 1287 (2011) Scott Brame MOFFETT v. Lauren Lee MOFFETT. No. 10-1364, 10-1365. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. June 22, 2011. *1288 Evelyn M. Oubre, Lake Charles, LA, for Defendant/Appellant Lauren Lee Moffett. John Green, AAA Legal Services, Inc., Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee Scott Brame Mo

SEXTON, Judge Pro Tem. |,In this tort action, Plaintiffs, Dennis and Betty G. Quillian (collectively “Mr. Quillian”), appeal the judgment of the trial court finding that Mr. Quillian was solely at fault in causing an accident that resulted in his injury and, thus, finding no liability on the part of Defendant, Dixie Bonded Warehouse (“Dixie”) and dismissing the Quillians’ claim with prejudice. For the reasons stated herein, we

| , COOKS, J. Dissenting: I have read the entire transcript of the hearing on the motion to recuse and Judge Godwin’s Per Curiam. Although I do not question Judge Godwin’s recitation of the events leading up and following the allotment of this matter to Judge Alcide Gray, his decision to call the District Attorney and to speak with him concerning the allotment ex parte and then to act on the

COOKS, Judge. [ ! Kimberly Beth Hensgens Guinn (Kimberly) filed a petition for divorce from Nathaniel Stuart Guinn (Stuart) on June 25, 2014, in which she prayed for joint custody of their three minor children.1 The three children are ages ten (M.K.G), eight (N.S.G.) and six (G.E.G.). She also asked to be named domiciliary parent with Stuart to have reasonable access to the children. Stuart filed

982 So.2d 975 (2008) Wanda BATISTE v. FARM BUREAU, et al. No. 2007-1586. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 7, 2008. Thomas J. DeJean, DeJean & Leger, L.L.C., Opelousas, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Wanda Batiste. *976 Fred Schroeder, Craig E. Frosch, Usry, Weeks & Matthews, New Orleans, Louisi

GARRETT, J. hThe plaintiff, Ted L. Luquette, appeals from a jury verdict and judgment rejecting his claims against his uninsured/underin-sured (“UM”) carrier, Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company (“Farm Bureau”), and finding that he failed to prove that the driver of the car who allegedly injured him was uninsured or under-insured. The plaintiff requests that this court reverse the trial court judgment, review the

GENEVA VIDRINE, ET AL. v. JASON T. LAFLEUR, ET AL. No. 07-1551. Court of Appeals of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 30, 2008. JIMMY L. DAUZAT, DAUZAT, FALGOUST, CAVINESS and BIENVENU Counsel for Defendants/Appellees, Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Jason Lafleur. CHARLES C. GARRISON, CAFFERY, OUBRE, CAMPBELL & GARRISON, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee, Waven Laf

|,CLAIBORNE, J. The claimant appeals a judgment by a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ)2 dismissing her claims for workers’ compensation benefits. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the WCJ. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Brenda Bibbins filed this claim for workers’ compensation benefits against her employer, Sonny’s Pizza, Inc.,

CLARK, Justice. liWe granted the writ of the City of Bossier City (hereinafter “City”) to determine the proper interpretation of La. R.S. 33:2501(C)(1); specifically, whether the statutory authority of the Bossier City Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board (hereinafter “Board”) to modify discipline is conditioned upon a finding the appointing authority acted in bad faith or without cause. After our review, we find a

pAMY, Judge. The plaintiff filed suit against his former wife and several pharmacies, claiming that while he and his wife were separated, but before their divorce, the pharmacies released copies of his prescription profiles to his wife without his consent, causing him to suffer, inter alia, embarrassment and emotional distress. The plaintiff eventually dismissed his claims against the pharmacies pursuant to a comp

pAMY, Judge. A parish police jury filed suit against the defendant sugar-cane farmers, alleging that the defendants’ harvesting operations damaged a parish road. The police jury *69sought to recover amounts expended to repair the damaged road. A bench trial was held in the matter, in which the judge dismissed the police jury’s cause of action on the basis that the defe

STOKER, Judge. For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.

STOKER, Judge. For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.

STOKER, Judge. For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.

STOKER, Judge. For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.

STOKER, Judge. For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.

STOKER, Judge, For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.

STOKER, Judge. For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.