Cases

Opinion by JUDGE HAWTHORNE ¶ 1 In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs, twenty-five insurance companies 1 (collectively, the. carriers), appeal-the district court’s judgment dismissing their inverse condemnation claims against defendants, Colorado Department of Public Safety (the Department) and De

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinions || September 24, 2015 Colorado Court of Appeals -- September 24, 2015 2015 COA 135. Nos. 14CA0950 & 14CA0968. American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. American National Property and Casualty Company. Â COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2015 COA 13

ORDER JAMES R. NOWLIN, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 24), along with Plaintiffs’ Response (Dkt. No. 25) and Defendant’s Reply (Dkt. No. 27). For reasons set out below, the Court GRANTS Defendants Motion. I. Overview Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Nationwide breached their homeowners’ policy

414 F.Supp.2d 981 (2006) Melissa M. BRYANT, individually, and the Estate of Jeffrey J. Bryant, deceased, by and through Melissa M. Bryant, its Personal Representative, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendant. No. C04-2429C. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. February 2, 2006.

123 S.W.3d 242 (2003) James McKINNEY, et al., Respondents, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE, Appellant. No. WD 61948. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 28, 2003. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied December 23, 2003. Application for Transfer Denied January 27, 2004. *243

45 Wn. App. 272 (1986) 724 P.2d 1096 PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. JAMES CAMERON, as Administrator, ET AL, Respondents. Nos. 14590-8-I; 14614-9-I; 14615-7-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. September 2, 1986. Mark R. Bucklin, for appellant. Susan Delanty Jones, Charles E. Peery, Prest

184 Cal.App.3d 420 (1986) 229 Cal. Rptr. 192 JESUS SOTO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. E002362. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two. August 13, 1986. *423 COUNSEL Heiting & Irwin and Jam

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Linda Stone sued Troy Construction Inc. ("Troy"), on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, alleging a willful violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). She claims that Troy paid local employees per diem compensation that should have been classified as wages and included in the regular rate of pay, which would in turn have affected the calcula

Filed 4/17/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CROSNO CONSTRUCTION, INC., D075561, D075562 Cross-complainant and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1511273) TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Cross-def

Opinion filed September 29, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals

Opinion filed September 29, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-10-00007-CV __________ LINDA S. NEIDERT, Appellant V. SUSAN J. COLLIER AND JOHN P. SEARLS, Appellees On Appeal from the 70th

945 P.2d 232 (1997) 88 Wash.App. 261 Jose MENDOZA and Elisa Mendoza, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Ramiro RIVERA-CHAVEZ and Jane Doe Chavez, husband and wife, Defendants, Leader National Insurance, Respondent. LEADER NATIONAL INSURANCE, a foreign insurance corporation, doing business in the State of Washington, Respondent. v. Ramiro RIVERA-CHAVEZ, Jose Mendoza and Elisa Mendoza, husband and wife; Salvado

ORDER VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, District Judge. This cause came before the Court for a non-jury trial commencing on February 24, 2014, and concluding on March 4, 2014. On April 23, 2014, the parties timely filed their proposed orders, which included the parties’ proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, (Doc. ##161, 162, 163), as ordered by the Court at the conclusion of trial

DELA CRUZ, Chief Justice: This consolidated appeal involves several issues arising from the plaintiffs wrongful death suit as personal representative for the heirs of the decedent, Mr. Akinobu Ito. Ito drowned while on a scuba diving trip supervised by the defendants. On the day of his death, Ito signed an “AGREEMENT FOR EXEMPTION FROM OBLIGATION.” The trial court ruled on a pre-trial motion that the release

*211TIMLIN, J. I respectfully dissent. I Introduction In my opinion, the majority opinion, including its disposition, is based on: (A) the faulty factual premises that: (1) plaintiffs admitted that defendant’s delay in set