Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Odessa Spell”
Opinion filed May 12, 2022 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-20-00125-CV __________ SYLVIA MORRISON AND RICK MORRISON, Appellants/ Cross-Appellees V. NANCY ASAMOA, M.D.; JOHN MCKENNA, M.D.; SATISH MOCHERLA, M.D.; HAYAN ORFALY, M.D.; PERMIAN PREMIER HEALTH SERVIC
Odessa Trading Co. v. Federal Crop Insurancepublic domain
6 Wn. App. 423 (1972) 493 P.2d 809 ODESSA TRADING COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellant. No. 415-3. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. February 2, 1972. Dean C. Smith, United States Attorney, and Carroll D. Gray, Assistant, for appe
MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge: The plaintiff, Mrs. Odessa Carrion, is a black citizen of the United States who was employed by defendant Yeshiva University (Yeshiva) as a Social Work Supervisor at Lincoln Hospital, an institution owned and operated by the City of New York. The hospital’s professional services were supplied by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, a division of Yesh
Vincent v. Geithnerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Plaintiff Odessa F. Vincent (“plaintiff’) brings this action against the Mayor of the District of Columbia, Vincent Gray, Chief Judge of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia (“D.C. Superior Court”), Lee F. Satterfield, Chief Judge of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Eric T.
Odessa Woods v. The National Life and Accident Insurance Company, a Tennessee Corporationpublic domain
FORMAN, Circuit Judge (concurring) : I concur in the ultimate result reached by my colleagues that the judgment of the district court be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. I have difficulty, however, in associating myself with certain of the grounds upon which my brethren rest in reaching the result and will address myself to other factors which, i
Armendariz v. Statepublic domain
OPINION HOLCOMB, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KELLER, P. J., and PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined. The court of appeals held that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress. Armendariz v. State, 63 S.W.3d 572, 578 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2001). We reverse. The Relevant Fac
DELAPAZ v. Statepublic domain
OPINION The jury convicted Frank Guerra Delapaz1 of aggravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. The jury assessed his punishment at confinement for life and a $10,000 fine for the aggravated sexual assault conviction and confinement for twenty years and a $10,000 fine for the indecency with a child conviction. Delapaz challenges his convictions with one issue on appeal. We affirm.
Apolonio Rodriguez, III v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed February 5, 2015 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-12-00346-CR __________ APOLONIO RODRIGUEZ, III, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal fro
Martin v. Wilson Memorial Hospital, Inc.public domain
Mercure, J.P Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dowd, J.), entered November 11, 2002 in Chenango County, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff Jo Ann Martin (hereinafter plaintiff) and her husband, derivatively, seek to recover for injuries to plaintiffs *939back and right leg sustained when sh
Loera v. Fuentespublic domain
OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice. This is personal injury case arising out of injuries sustained in a collision between the Loeras’ pickup truck and a tractor-trailer driven by Joe Fuentes and owned by Nabors Well Services, Ltd. After hearing all the evidence, including testimony from two experts regarding the Loeras’ failure to wear seat belts, the jury found Fuentes to be 50% negligen
Akeem Enakele v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed September 25, 2020 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-18-00235-CR __________ AKEEM ENAKELE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Ector Coun
United States v. Furmanpublic domain
168 F.Supp.2d 609 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, v. William M. FURMAN. No. CR. A. 90-427. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 13, 2001. *610 *611 William Michael Furman, Odessa, TX, pro se. Harry William McSherry, Mary Jude Darrow, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Orleans,
Coots v. Leonardpublic domain
959 S.W.2d 299 (1997) William Joseph and Judith Ann COOTS, Appellants, v. Randall Wayne LEONARD, Appellee. No. 08-96-00278-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. October 30, 1997. *300 Marc R. May, Odessa, for appellants. Carmen Elaine Eiker, Midland, for appellee. Before BARAJAS, C.J., and LARSEN and McCLURE, JJ.<
Brandon Clark Davis v. Statepublic domain
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00689-CR Brandon Clark DAVIS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
In Re Estate of Torrancepublic domain
991 S.W.2d 98 (1999) In re ESTATE OF E. Marie TORRANCE, Deceased. No. 08-98-00013-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. February 4, 1999. Linda Ibach Shaunessy, Austin, for Appellant. Roy L. Bell, Law Offices of Roy Bell, Eben D. Warner, Odessa, Clifford Hardwick, Midland, for Appellee. *99 Before BARAJAS, C.J., LARSEN, a
283 S.W.3d 804 (2009) CLIFFORD HINDMAN REAL ESTATE, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF JENNINGS, Respondent. No. ED 91472. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. March 10, 2009. Rehearing Denied April 16, 2009. *805 Stephen C. Murphy, Michael J. Hart, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Jamis Kresy
Hays v. Statepublic domain
360 S.W.3d 304 (2012) Brad A. HAYS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. WD 73468. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. February 7, 2012. *307 Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang and Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before Division Two: GARY
Armendariz, Jose Francopublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 0070-02
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Slaughterpublic domain
OPINION This case involves the application of the personal convenience doctrine in a workers' compensation death case. We agree with the trial court that the evidence established the worker was within the course and scope of his employment at the time of his injury, which ultimately led to his death. We further hold that any error in the admission of a statement made by the injured man to his son shortly after the accident was harmless, as other independent evidence f
386 F.Supp.2d 759 (2004) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Keith BAILEY v. ECTOR COUNTY HOSPITAL d/b/a Medical Center Hospital, Nam H. Kim, M.D., Shanti K. Neerukonda, M.D., Alan C. Leshnower, M.D., P.A., and George L. Alexander, M.D. No. MMO-03-CV-183. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Midland-Odessa Division. August 31, 2004. *