Cases

141 P.3d 780 (2006) Stanley GRIFFIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PINAL COUNTY, Defendant/Appellee, and Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Intervenor/Appellee. No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0052. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. August 4, 2006. *781 Fennemore Craig, By Timothy Berg, Janice Procter-Murphy, a

156 P.3d 418 (2007) Stanley GRIFFIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PINAL COUNTY, Defendant/Appellee, and Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Intervenor/Appellee. No. CV-06-0312-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. April 25, 2007. *419 Fennemore Craig PC by Timothy Berg, Janice Procter-Murphy, Theresa Dwyer, Phoenix,

OPINION PELANDER, J. ¶ 1 In these two consolidated appeals, plaintiffs/appellants Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L.C., and FVR Land Investment Company (collectively, Robson) in case number CV 2002-0054 and plaintiffs/appellants Anam, Inc., and Elaine Helzer (collectively, Anam) in case number CV 2002-0060 appeal from the trial court’s rulings denying their requests for declaratory and injunctive relief

230 P.3d 713 (2010) ARIZONA CITY SANITARY DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Petitioner, v. Hon. Robert Carter OLSON, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pinal, Respondent, and Pinal County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Pinal County Board of Supervisors, a body politic; Pete Rios, Bryan Martyn and David Snider, in their capacities as members of the Pinal Cou

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED BY CLERK STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO APR 16 2010 COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO ARIZONA CITY SANITARY ) DISTRICT, a political subdivision of ) 2 CA-SA 2010-0016 the S

186 Ariz. 236 (1996) 921 P.2d 36 In the Matter of the APPEAL IN PINAL COUNTY JUVENILE DELINQUENCY ACTION No. JV-9404492. No. 2 CA-JV 96-0008. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. July 30, 1996. *237 Robert Carter Olson, Pinal County Attorney by Norma Lebario, Florence, for State. Gregan La

188 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 1999) DR. KENNETH J. OLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.RICHARD MORRIS, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, TERRY SCRITCHLOW, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, MAXINE IJAMS, individually and in her official capacity as a member of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, F. G. BOLTON, in

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge: Dr. Kenneth Olson, a licensed psychologist, performed an exorcism on a child believed to have been the victim of Satanic ritual abuse. Although Olson is also an ordained minister, the boy had been referred to Olson solely for psychological evaluation and treatment. On complaint made by the child welfare caseworkers who had referred the youngster to Olson, the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiner

166 Ariz. 455 (1990) 803 P.2d 448 Douglas OLSON, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. The STATE of Arizona, and Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Defendants/Appellants. No. 2 CA-CV 90-0032. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. October 4, 1990. Redesignated as Opinion and Publication Ordered December 11, 1990. C

263 P.3d 61 (2011) Rochelle E. COHEN, individually, and as the natural surviving parent of Joseph Eichten, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph Eichten, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Arizona, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 10-0511. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. August 16, 2011.

OPINION ECKERSTROM, Judge. ¶ 1 In this consolidated special action and appeal from the trial court’s denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, Steven Fuller seeks relief from his continued detention on a petition filed by the state alleging he is a sexually violent person. Specifically, he maintains that his rights under Arizona statutes and the Due P

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VALLE DEL SOL INCORPORATED; No. 12-17152 COALICION DE DERECHOS HUMANOS; UNITED FOOD AND D.C. No. COMMERCIAL WORKERS 2:10-cv-01061- INTERNATIONAL UNION; BORDER SRB ACTION NETWORK; JIM SHEE; UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Jane Doe #3 in Amended Complaint; OPINION JOHN DOE #1, proceeding under pseudonym; LUZ SANTIAGO; ARIZONA SOUTH ASI

620 S.E.2d 826 (2005) 279 Ga. 825 105 FLOYD ROAD, INC. v. CRISP COUNTY. Winner v. Crisp County. Nos. S05A1048, S05A1049. Supreme Court of Georgia. October 11, 2005. Reconsideration Denied November 7, 2005. Alan I. Begner, Cory Goldsmith Begner, Katherine K. Wood, Begner & Begner, P.C., Atlanta, H. Louis Sirkin

613 S.E.2d 632 (2005) 279 Ga. 345 105 FLOYD ROAD, INC. v. CRISP COUNTY. No. S05A0373. Supreme Court of Georgia. May 23, 2005. Alan I. Begner, Katie K. Wood, Begner & Begner, P.C., Atlanta, H. Louis Sirkin, Sirkin, Pinales & Schwartz, LLP, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellant. Peter Ralph Olson, Brandon Lowell Bowen, Jenkins & Olso

185 Ariz. 5 (1995) 912 P.2d 9 TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APACHE COUNTY, Cochise County, Coconino County, Graham County, Greenlee County, Maricopa County, Navajo County, Pima County, Pinal County, Santa Cruz County and Yavapai County, political subdivisions of the State of Arizona; the Arizona Department of Revenue, an agency of the State of Arizona; and the Treasurer of t

ORDER CINDY K. JORGENSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Dale Gorney, who is proceeding pro se, filed this case alleging that he was wrongfully terminated from his employment at the Uni filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC, and Plaintiff opposed. (Docs. 33, 34.) Magistrate Judge Charles P. Pyle issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be granted. (Doc. 38.) Pl

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV