Cases

OPINION WOLFSON, United States District Judge: This matter arises out of a Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Alma and Gregory Rush (collectively, “Plaintiffs’”), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., as well as a state law claim for invasion of privacy. Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Defendant” or “Portfolio”) filed a motion fo

Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Midland Funding, LLC's ("Midland") Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 69] and Plaintiff Quentin Thompson's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 71].1 Thompson claims that Midland violated two provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692f(1) and 1692e(5), by s

NUMBER 13-25-00529-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG TURBO RESTAURANTS, LLC, Appellant, v. 900 S. JACKSON, LLC, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 430TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDA

409 B.R. 543 (2009) In re 201 FOREST STREET LLC & 219 Forest Street LLC, Debtors. 201 Forest Street LLC, 201 Forest Street Realty Trust, 219 Forest Street LLC, & 219 Forest Street Realty Trust, Plaintiffs, v. LBM Financial LLC & Marcello Mallegni, Defendants. Nos. 07-42296-JBR, 07-41768-JBR. Adversary No. 07-4097. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Central Division.</

LAWRENCE MARON, J.S.C. This matter comes before the Court on remand from the Appellate Division. In Flecker v. Statue Cruises, LLC, No. A-4390-10 (App.Div. Nov. 14, 2012) (slip op. at 2), 2012 WL 5499894, the Appellate Division instructed this court to “make specific factual findings that include a determination to what extent, if any, [defendants’] operation[ ] extend[s] into federal waters, and if so, whether

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. AG Ins. SA/NV, 2019 NCBC 73. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 17 CVS 5594 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON JOINING DEFENDANTS’ A

Jetro Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff, againstMastercard International, Inc. and MASTERCARD INCORPORATED, Defendants. 60374/2015 ROPES & GRAY LLPBy: Douglas H. Meal, Esq.William P. Harrington, Esq., of counselAttorneys for PlaintiffPrudential Towe

OPINION OF THE COURT KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., a debt collector is liable to a consumer for contacting third parties in pursuit of that' consumer’s debt unless the communication falls under a statutory exception. One of those exceptions covers communicatio

OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Appellant Julian Salim appeals the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of his adversary proceeding against Appellee Alan Nisselson, Chapter 7 Trustee of Debtor Big Apple Volkswagen, LLC. For the reasons set forth below, the bankruptcy court’s decision is affirmed. BACKGROUND1 Salim is

795 F.Supp.2d 829 (2011) DILLINGER, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., Defendant. No. 1:09-cv-01236-JMS-DKL. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. June 15, 2011. *830 Erin C. Nave, Jonathan G. Polak, Keirian Antares Brown, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff.

FILED 1 ORDERED PUBL ED ISH AUG 06 2014 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 O

OPINION OF THE COURT Judith A. Hard, J. Procedural Background In February 2009, this court granted claimant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, holding that a 2003 Supreme Court decision collaterally estopped the State from re-litigating the issue of whether there had been ministerial neglect (Signature Health Ctr, LLC v State of New York, 23 Misc 3d 1103[

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: This case involves a dispute between ERISA funds and their third-party plan administrator over compensation and the quality of services rendered. MagnaCare Administrative Services, LLC and Magna-Care, LLC (collectively “MagnaCare”) move to dismiss the Complaint. The Trustees of the United Teamster Fund (UTF) and Local 522 Welfare Fun

Gecko Robotics, Inc., retained Thrive Operations, LLC, to provide managed cybersecurity services on Gecko’s computer systems. The parties entered into a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) followed by a series of Service Orders. In February 2025, Gecko sent written notice asserting that Thrive was in material breach of its contractual obligations. Thirty days later, Gecko sent a letter stating that it was terminatin

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-20-00387-CV Jay C. Chowning and Clifton Chowning, Appellants v. Mark L. Boyer; Laureen Boyer; Lake Austin Storage, LLC; and 2017 River Bend, L.P., Appellees FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-18-003796, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK,

OPINION OF THE COURT Paul I. Marx, J. It is ordered that plaintiffs’ motion to preclude is granted, for the reasons which follow. Plaintiffs Eduardo Nobre, Jr., by his mother and natural guardian, Jennifer Ferraro, and Jennifer Ferraro, individually, brought this medical malpractice action against defendants James Shanahan, M.D., James Brockunier, M.D., and St. Anthony Community Hospit

*1301Memorandum Opinion and Order MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. I.Introduction Four of the five defendants in this case have moved to dismiss the claims against them. The City of Abbeville and Officer John Duhaime filed the first Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 12), followed by similar Motions to Dismiss filed by Henry Count, Alaba

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, D.E. 18, filed on January 6, 2014, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, D.E. 30, filed on March 7, 2014. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiffs Motion, D.E. 24, on February 24, 2014, and Plaintiff filed her Reply, D.E. 29, on March 3, 2014.