⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013-01-28 · Published · cited 270× · 708 F.3d 520; 2013 WL 310350; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2005
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge KING joined. OPINION DIAZ, Circuit Judge: Virginia inmate Ophelia Azriel De’lonta (born Michael A. Stokes) filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that prison officials denied her adequate medical treat
De'Lonta v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012-11-27 · Published · cited 0× · 490 F. App'x 579
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint alleging violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc (2006). We have reviewed the record a
De'Lonta v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 449 F. App'x 279
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying De’Lon-ta’s motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 12
De'Lonta v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 314 F. App'x 558
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ophelia De’Lonta appeals the magistrate judge’s stipulation of dismissal order.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in her order denying De’Lon-
De'Lonta v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 314 F. App'x 558
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ophelia De’Lonta appeals the magistrate judge’s stipulation of dismissal order.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in her order denying De’Lon-