Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware No. 19-15506 Corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a D.C. No. California Corporation, 4:16-cv-01393- Plaintiffs-Appellants, JST v. OPINION HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY, a Delawa

O'Malley, Circuit Judge. *1185 This copyright case returns to us after a second jury trial, this one focusing on the defense of fair use. Oracle America, Inc. ("Oracle") filed suit against Google Inc. ("Google") 1 in the United

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Re: Dkt. Nos. 110, 137, 138 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Greg Garrison (“Garrison”), Deborah Van Vorst (“Van Vorst”), and Sastry Hari (“Hari”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendant Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) for alleged violations of federal and Californi

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

Filed 5/12/25; certified for publication 5/30/25 CA6 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RICHARD BARTEL, H052083 (Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 16CV02814) v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

426 B.R. 114 (2010) In re SPANSION, INC., et al.[1] Debtors. U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, Plaintiff, v. Wilmington Trust Company, Spansion, Inc., Spansion Technology LLC, Spansion LLC, Cerium Laboratories LLC and Spansion International, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-10690(KJC). Adversary No. 09-52274. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge I. Introduction Drawing an analogy to the fate of penguins whose destinies appear doomed in the face of uncertain environmental changes; Defendant. Staples Inc. (“Staples”) and Defendant Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) (collectively “Defendants”) argue they are l

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 2, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

531 F.Supp.2d 1173 (2007) In re VERISIGN, INC., DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. This Order Applies to: All Actions. No. C 06-4165 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 14, 2007. *1174 *1175 *1176 *1177

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting: “The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact ... are what I mean by the law,” wrote Justice Holmes almost a century ago. O.W. Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv L Rev 457, 461 (1897). According to Holmes, the business of lawyers is the prediction of when and how the coercive power of the state will affect people’s lives: People want t

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TERADATA CORPORATION; No. 23-16065 TERADATA US, INC.; TERADATA OPERATIONS, INC., D.C. No. 3:18-cv- 03670-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION SAP SE; SAP AMERICA, INC.; SAP LABS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United S

Filed 5/27/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OGEN PERRY et al., H051093 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 21CV386331) v. WILLIAM R. STUART et al., Defendants and Appellants. DAHLEX LP et al., H0519

*1211 Opinion FYBEL, J.— INTRODUCTION A special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, 1 is t

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALTERA CORPORATION & Nos. 16-70496 SUBSIDIARIES, 16-70497 Petitioner-Appellee, Tax Ct. Nos. v. 6253-12 9963-12 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Res

O'ROURKE, J. *733*9The Orange County District Attorney (the District Attorney), representing "the People of the State of California," sued petitioners Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Duramed Pharmac

Filed 5/24/23; Opinion following rehearing CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, E078673 v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1908673) SAN BERNARDINO

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, District Judge. Ingeniador, LLC (“Plaintiff’) brings this complaint against Alfresco Software, Inc. (“Alfresco”), Interwoven, Inc. (“Interwoven”), Blackboard, Inc. (“Blackboard”), Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (“Bridgeline”), EMC Corp. (“EMC”), Hewlett-Packard Co. (“HP”), Informática Corp. (“Informática”), Compulink Management Center, Inc. (“Compulink”), Lexmark International,

Filed 12/22/22 See dissenting opinion CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, E078673 v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1908673) SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, Responden