Cases

2021 UT App 128 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LARRY PETERSON AND GLORIA PETERSON, Appellants and Cross-appellees, v. HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, AND MURDOCK HYUNDAI LLC, Appellees and Cross-appellants. Opinion No. 20190979-CA Filed November 18, 2021 Fourth District Court, Prov

789 P.2d 713 (1990) Margieann W. OSTLER (Wyatt), and the State of Utah, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Raymond Floyd OSTLER, Defendant and Respondent. No. 880172-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 20, 1990. *714 Penny Heal Trask, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and appellants. Harold R. Stephens, Salt Lake City, for defenda

BENCH, Judge (dissenting): I respectfully dissent. The main opinion improperly addresses issues that, as a result of the jury’s no-cause-of-action verdict, are not before this court. In dicta, however, the main opinion goes far beyond the scope of the case law governing the issues framed in the main opinion. In the event that the main opinion might be misconstrued as binding case law, I feel compelled to respo

538 P.2d 1325 (1975) Dennis PRINCE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Darlene PETERSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 13765. Supreme Court of Utah. July 22, 1975. *1326 Gary D. Stott, of Stott & Young, Provo, for defendant and appellant. Dave McMullan, Payson, for plaintiff and respondent. CROCKETT, Justice: De

FRICK, J. The plaintiffs commenced this action against one Oscar Peterson and the Deseret National Bank to declare a certain contract entered into between plaintiffs and Peterson terminated, the payments made by Peterson thereunder to be forfeited to the plaintiffs, and that all the documents, papers, etc., placed with the Deseret National Bank in escrow, together with all other property delivered to said Peterson under such

2022 UT App 96 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DEAN VIERTEL, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. BODY FIRM AEROBICS LLC, VASA TARGET LLC, VASA FITNESS LLC, SCOTT FELSTED, AND TROY PETERSON, Appellees and Cross-appellants. Opinion No. 20200841-CA Filed August 4, 2022 Fourth District Cou

118 F.Supp.2d 885 (2000) MOREQUITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Abdul NAEEM, Sally S. Naeem, Prairie Village Townhome Association, Fremont Investment & Loan, and United States of America, Defendants. Abdul Naeem and Sally S. Naeem, Counter/Cross/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. MorEquity, Inc., Counter-Defendant, Fremont Investment & Loan, Cross-Defendant, Theresa Miller, Land Title Group, Inc., and Carol Buczkowski, Third-Party Def

2025 UT App 45 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS TERRY V. PEARCE AND TONY M. PEARCE, Appellants, v. PURPLE INNOVATION, INC., Appellee. Opinion No. 20240032-CA Filed April 3, 2025 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Robert C.

907 P.2d 1162 (1995) HARMON CITY, INC., a Utah corporation; and Terry Harmon, individually, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NIELSEN & SENIOR, a Utah professional corporation; Michael Gottfredson, an individual; Nielsen, Henriod, Gottfredson & Peck, a Utah professional corporation; Nielsen, Conder, Henriod & Gottfredson, a Utah professional corporation; W. Waldan Lloyd, an individual; D. Jay Curtis, an individual; and John or Jane Does I

Opinion VOROS, Judge: T 1 This appeal arises from a fraud scheme related to real property near Park City, Utah. Appellant Clair, Rulon Hawkins was originally charged as one of the perpetrators of the scheme with three counts of communications fraud and one count of engaging in a pattern of unlawful activity, Sandra Chapple and Kimberly Bowen were also charged

32 Cal.Rptr.3d 5 (2005) 36 Cal.4th 944 116 P.3d 479 GRAFTON PARTNERS L.P., et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Alameda County, Respondent; PriceWaterhouseCoopers L.L.P., Real Party in Interest. No. S123344. Supreme Court of California. August 4, 2005. Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jero

2023 UT App 151 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JENCO LC, DEAN GARDNER INVESTMENT LC, AND F.M. SNOW PROPERTIES LLC, Appellants, v. SJI LLC, Appellee. Opinion No. 20220892-CA Filed December 14, 2023 Fifth District Court, St. George Department

2021 UT App 70 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS HKS ARCHITECTS INC., Appellant, v. MSM ENTERPRISES LTD, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS LLC, R. SCOTT MCQUARRIE, HOWARD BASHFORD, RONDO FEHLBERG, AND TIMOTHY FORSTROM, Appellees. Opinion No. 20200043-CA Filed July 1, 2021

*671Opinion McHUGH, Judge: ¶ 1 M.B. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor child, C.B. In particular, Mother contests the juvenile court's denial of her motion to stay termination proceedings pending an evaluation of her competency. We affirm in part and dismiss Mother's appeal in part.

HARRIS, Judge: ¶ 1 While giving her brother Luis Luna (Luna) a ride to work, Maria Luna (Sister) was involved in an automobile accident in which Luna was injured. Luna sued Sister for negligence, yet during depositions testified unequivocally that the traffic light was green in Sister's favor. Sister contends-and we agree-that this testimony constitutes a binding judicial admission tha

73 P.3d 967 (2003) 2003 UT App 203 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Tomas G. ROJAS-MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020706-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. June 19, 2003. *968 Hakeem Ishola, Ishola & Associates PC, Katy, Texas, for Appellant. Craig T. Peterson, Deputy Davis County

DAVIS, Judge. *547Patricia L. Head ("Plaintiff") appeals from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Adams Farm Living, Inc. ("Defendant") on her claim that she was wrongfully discharged in violation of North Carolina public policy due to her religious beliefs. After careful review, we affirm. Fact

320 F.Supp. 531 (1970) Billie K. FREEMAN, Guardian of Terry Freeman, Plaintiff, v. Almon FLAKE, Principal of Viewmont High School, the Board of Education of Davis County School District, and Irvin R. Cleverly, Morris Hansen, Henry E. Peterson, Lynn W. Burton, and Harold J. Gailey, members of the Board of Education of Davis County School District, and Bernell Wrigley, Superintendent of Davis County Schools, Defendants. Vyron Randall OSTLER, a

2013 UT App 7 _________________________________________________________ THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF C.B., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE M.B., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion

OPINION GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge: 11 Payson City appeals the trial court's reversal of the City Council's decision denying plaintiffs' request to change the zoning of their property. The trial court determined the City Council's decision was arbitrary and capricious because it was not supported by any evidence other than public opinion. We reverse. BACKGROUND 12 T