Cases

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. OSUNA VELIZ NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

EBEL, Circuit Judge. SUMMARY Brayan Alexis Osuna-Gutierrez argues his deportation was improper for two reasons: (1) the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) expedited removal process is illegal; and (2)' in any event, it' was improper for DHS to use th'e expedited removal process on Gutierrez because he pled guilty to a misdemeanor, not a felony. Howe

Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint filed on behalf of defendants. (Doc. No. 9-1.) A hearing on the motion was held on December 18, 2018. Attorney Mark Merin appeared in person on behalf of plaintiffs. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared telephonically on behalf of defendants. Having reviewed the parties' submissions, and having heard from counsel, de

CASSELS, Judge: Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Despite his pleas of not guilty, he was convicted of one specification of violating a lawful general order by making unwelcome sexual advances to Seaman Apprentice (SA) K and creating an intimidating or hostile work environment; two specifications of wrongful maltreatment of SA K; one specification of adultery with SA K; an

151 P.3d 1267 (2007) Penny OSUNA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation; Sam's Club, an operating segment of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendants/Appellees. No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0039. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B. February 8, 2007. Shugart Thomson & Kilroy, P.C. By Marty Harper, Rudolph J. Gerber, Gary D. Ansel,

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Washington, D.C. UNITED STATES v. Mike (NMN) OSUNA Seaman (E-3), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMG 0152 Docket No. 1122 28 November 2001 General Cou

189 F.3d 1289 (10th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.FELIX RENDON OSUNA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-5005 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT September 2, 1999 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. D.C. NO. 97-CR-110-CNeal B. Kirkpatri

FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FEB -8 2007 STATE OF ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO DIVISION TWO PENNY OSUNA, ) ) 2 CA-CV 2006-0039 Pl

This is an appeal of plaintiff-appellant, Joseph P. Ebbing, from a judgment of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas dismissing a complaint brought in a special proceeding under R.C. 3.08 for the removal of a public officer. With particular reference to such an appeal, R.C. 3.09 provides: *Page 341 "The decision of the court of common pleas in all cases for the removal o

CANBY, Circuit Judge: Defendants Roberto Ramirez-Rangel and Joel Lobo-Osuna appeal their convictions and sentences for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(A)(viii) (Count 1); use of a firearm (machine guns) in drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (Count 2); and being illegal aliens in po

OPINION Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice This is an interlocutory appeal from a trial court’s order denying a motion to dismiss filed by appellant Enrique Lopez d/b/a Maternidad La Piedad (“Lopez”). *63 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Cod

OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Hunt, J. Respondent, Amanda Q., has filed objections to an order issued by the Support Magistrate on May 20, 2015. That order, which is referred to as an “order of dismissal,” in effect denies respondent’s application for entry of an order of support on behalf of the parties’ daughter, Adrielle O. The petitioner, Yemi O., the father of the child, has filed a rebuttal to the mo

Filed 12/19/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE LAURA LAZAR, B321752 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV17351) v. LYNETTE BISHOP et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Cour

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50160 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:21-cr- 00293-SB-1 v. MAHSA PARVIZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10293 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00046- GMN-PAL-15 TODD C. ENGEL, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of N

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10293 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00046- GMN-PAL-15 TODD C. ENGEL, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of N

[Cite as State v. Lopez-Olmedo, 2022-Ohio-2817.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 21CA011745 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CARLOS

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10464 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cr-00161- GEB-4 ROBERT TURCHIN, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern D

Opinion DETJEN, Acting P. J. Penal Code section 1170.126 1 enumerates the criteria for postconvictidn release of third strike offenders serving indeterminate life sentences for crimes that are not serious or violent felonies. Excluded from resentencing are those inmates with prior convictions for “an

Opinion issued May 1, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00501-CV ——————————— LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC., Appellant V. QUINTON WILLIAMS, App