⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Outgo, LLC”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 02138
Thuku v 324 E. 93 LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 02138) Thuku v 324 E. 93 LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 02138 Decided on April 10, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 06048
Medina v Millwood Mkt., LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 06048) Medina v Millwood Mkt., LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 06048 Decided on November 04, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 06048
Medina v Millwood Mkt., LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 06048) Medina v Millwood Mkt., LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 06048 Decided on November 04, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-03-22 · Published · cited 3× · 186 N.Y.S.3d 273; 214 A.D.3d 862; 2023 NY Slip Op 01504
Llivicura v 101 W. 78th, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 01504) Llivicura v 101 W. 78th, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 01504 Decided on March 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-06-17 · Published · cited 3× · 184 A.D.3d 750; 124 N.Y.S.3d 254; 2020 NY Slip Op 3405
GMAC Mtge., LLC v Galvin (2020 NY Slip Op 03405) GMAC Mtge., LLC v Galvin 2020 NY Slip Op 03405 Decided on June 17, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 16-P-420 Appeals Court PATRIOT POWER, LLC1 vs.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-04-15 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 02351
Yes Contr. Inc. v CLST Enters. LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 02351) Yes Contr. Inc. v CLST Enters. LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 02351 Decided on April 15, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reportin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-04-15 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 02351
Yes Contr. Inc. v CLST Enters. LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 02351) Yes Contr. Inc. v CLST Enters. LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 02351 Decided on April 15, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reportin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018-07-03 · Published · cited 112× · 894 F.3d 1187
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Alpenglow Botanicals, LLC ("Alpenglow") sued the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for a tax refund, alleging the IRS exceeded its statutory and constitutional authority by denying Alpenglow's business tax deductions under 26 U.S.C. § 280E. The district court dismissed Alpenglow's suit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 341 Ga. App. 283; 799 S.E.2d 597; 2017 WL 1407039; 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 181
Andrews, Judge. The appellee, Trinitec Portfolio Services, LLC (“Trinitec”), commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a first priority lien on property it had redeemed following a tax sale and the right to pursue a judicial foreclosure to satisfy its lien. The appellant, Crandall Postell, who acquired an interest in the subject property from the owners, was allowed to intervene.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-17-01053-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-11-23 · Published · cited 13× · 2016 NY Slip Op 7931; 144 A.D.3d 990; 42 N.Y.S.3d 43
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, nonparty Gary Greenwald & Partners, P.C., appeals, as limited by its brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Colangelo, J.), dated April 30, 2014, as, upon granting the plaintiff’s motion to relieve it as counsel for the plaintiff, in effect, denied its application to establish an attorney’s retaining lien and charging lien
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) JACLYN C. GOODE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-01798 (APM)
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 4× · 426 P.3d 586
By the Court, PICKERING, J.: The Nevada workers' compensation system provides the exclusive remedy an employee has against his or her employer for a work-related injury. This case requires us to decide whether an injury arising from an employer's failure to provide medical assistance to an employee suffering a stroke arose out of and in the course of the employment. We hold that it did. Because an employee's sole remedy for such an
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-07-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 5117
New Rainbow Heaven LLC v Wesco Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 05117) New Rainbow Heaven LLC v Wesco Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 05117 Decided on July 10, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-06-16 · Published · cited 0× · 226 So. 3d 303; 2017 WL 2605150; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8842
LAMBERT, J. The parties in this case make their third appearance before this court. In this appeal, the Town of Ponce Inlet (“Town”) appeals a multi-million-dollar second amended final judgment entered following a jury trial on damages arising from an inverse condemnation claim as well as an earlier order resulting from a bench trial on liability (“liability order”) that found i
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-11-21 · Published · cited 128× · 663 F.3d 1034; 2011 WL 5839610
663 F.3d 1034 (2011) Robert NACHSHIN; Dawn Fairchild; Brian Geers; Laurence Gerard, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AOL, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendant-Appellee. Darren McKinney, Objector-Appellant, and Janel Buycks, Objector. No. 10-55129. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 413 P.3d 1114
DAVIS, Justice. [¶1] Petitioner Gabrielle Manigault seeks review of a decision in favor of her former attorneys, Daly & Sorenson, LLC, by a panel of the Wyoming State Bar Committee for Resolution of Fee Disputes. That decision was affirmed by the district court, and we in turn affirm that decision. ISSUES [¶2] Manigault raises two issues that may be succinctly restated as follow
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2018-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 TN WC 38
FILED Mar 29, 2018 08:00 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-01-12 · Published · cited 84× · 164 F. Supp. 3d 488; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3618; 2016 WL 154116
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The sanctions motion now pending in this case raises significant issues concerning the reach of newly amended Rule 37(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the standard of proof governing spoliation, and the relief appropriate for destruction of electronically stored information (“ESI”). The complaint alleges trademark infringemen