Cases

Memorandum Opinion on Count VI of the Plaintiff-Debtor’s Second Amended Complaint and the Defendant’s Motion for Relief from and Annul of Stay BENJAMIN COHEN, Bankruptcy Judge. The matters before the Court are Count IV of the Second Amended Complaint filed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)(l) by the plaintiff-debtor, Mr. Harold U. Owen, III, on September 21, 2012 (A.P. Docke

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. This is a civil action filed by the plaintiff, John Garrett, against the defendants, the Talladega County Drug and Violent Crime Task Force (“Task Force”) and Jim Pritchett. The complaint alleges, against the Task Force only, a claim for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Count One), and, against both the Task Force and Jim Pritchett,

MED1 NC Servs., LLC v. MED1 Plus, LLC, 2021 NCBC 38. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION ROBESON COUNTY 19 CVS 1983 MED1 NC SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MED1 PLUS, LLC; GREGORY ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTION STANTON BRYANT; FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMMONCAPITAL, LLC; DANIEL MORMAN;

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DOMAIN ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a Delaware ) limited liability company, JAMES C. BLAIR, ) BRIAN H. DOVEY, BRIAN K. HALAK, KIM ) P. KAMDAR, JESSE TREU, AND NICOLE ) VITULLO, ) ) Plaintiffs/Counterclaim ) Defendants, ) )

GORDON McCLOUD, J. ¶ 1 The Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, bars parties from challenging a local land use decision in state court if the parties fail to exhaust the administrative process. RCW 36.70C.030. The central issue in this case is (1) whether that administrative exhaustion rule applies to all tort claims that arise during the land use decision-making process.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

HSG, LLC v. Edge-Works Manuf. Co., 2015 NCBC 87. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF ONSLOW 15 CVS 309 HSG, LLC d/b/a “HIGH SPEED GEAR,” ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Court Judge, Northern District of Illinois Plaintiffs, a group of seven automotive dealers under the common control of Edward F. Napleton (“Napleton”), sued Defendants Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US, LLC (“FCA”) and FCA Realty, LLC f/k/a Chrysler Group Realty Company, LLC (“FCAR”) (collectively, “Defendants”) on federal and state groun

*186 WRIGHT, J. This appeal rises from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County in favor of the appellee-plaintiff, Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC (“MFV”), 1 against appellant-defendan

Dillard, Judge. These appeals arise out of a lease by Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC (“Citrus”) to David S. Owens, MD, PC (“the PC”) of certain magnetic resonance imaging equipment and related services. The trial court granted summary judgment to the PC’s principal, Dr. David S. Owens (“Owens”) in Citrus’s action on a guaranty agreement executed in connection with the lease. Citrus appeals from that order in Case No

586 F.Supp.2d 972 (2008) WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Andrew A. JAHELKA, Richard O. Nichols, Leon A. Greenblatt III, Banco Panamericano, Inc., Loop Corp., Loop Properties, Inc., and Scattered Corp., Defendants. No. 04 C 3082. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 22, 2008. *977 Adam Bre

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. The Coryn Group II, LLC (“Coryn II”) appealed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (“TTAB”) cancellation of its registration for the mark “SECRETS” for “resort hotel services” and its denial of other relief. O.C. Seacrets (“O.C.”) counterclaimed against Coryn II, and sued the Coryn Group, Inc., and AMR Resorts, LLC, (collectively “Coryn

*568OPINION By the Court, Cherry, C.J.: The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida has certified three questions to this court relating to the viability of equitable subrogation and the enforceability of contractual subordination against mechanic’s lien claimants under Nevada’s mechanic’s and materialman

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

ACCEPTED 13-15-00342-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/5/2015 6:01:20 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Frances M. Owens (“Plaintiff’) brings claims against her former employer, the Postal Service (“Defendant”) for racial discrimination. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”). (ECF No. 68.) Plaintiff Owens (“Plaintiff’) has filed a Response to this Motion (ECF No. 72) and