Cases

492 F.Supp.2d 1283 (2007) Kristin CARIDEO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DELL, INC., Defendant. No. C06-1772JLR. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. June 18, 2007. *1284 Beth E. Terrell, Mary B. Reiten, Tousley Brain Stephens, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs. Beverly G. Reeves, Kim E. Brightwell, Paul Schlaud,

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. Plaintiffs brought this bid protest to challenge the Department of the Army’s decision to take corrective action after multiple previous protests had been filed at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”). The underlying solicitation sought to procure commercial off-the-shelf computer hardware through indefinite-deli

NAKAMOTO, J. Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) that concluded that her injury, which occurred from an idiopathic1 fall from a standing position onto the brick floor of her workspace, was not compensable. On judicial review, claimant assigns error to the board’s ruling that the “mixed risk” doctrine does not govern injuries sustained as a result of an idiop

Matter of Linda UU. v Dana VV. (2023 NY Slip Op 00013) Matter of Linda UU. v Dana VV. 2023 NY Slip Op 00013 Decided on January 5, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

OPINION BY Judge P. KEVIN BROBSON. Petitioners, all of whom advocate on behalf of consumers affected by the Customer Assistance Program (CAP) of PECO Energy Company (PECO),1 appeal two orders entered by Respondent the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC). In those two orders, the PUC approved in part a PECO plan, called the CAP Shopping Plan, which would allow PECO’s CAP c

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, District Judge: In this maritime case, Plaintiff Michael Giganti (“Plaintiff’), a longshoreman, slipped and fell while discharging sugar from the M/S PILICA (“PILICA” or the “Vessel”). He brings this negligence action against Defendants Polsteam Shipping Co. (“Polsteam”), the owner pro hac vice of the Vessel, and CSC Sugar, LLC, the charterer of t

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1279 Doc: 40 Filed: 09/06/2023 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1279 CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC, INC., a West Virginia Corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons,

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit J. Darrell E. Jenkins appeals the denial of his application for social-security disability benefits. He argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) based the denial on insubstantial evidence and improperly evaluated his allegations of subjective pain. The District Court upheld the denial. We reverse. I. Mr. Jenkins is a 55-year-old man with a high-school e

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Jeffrey T. Fogle, appeals the judgment entered by the Portage County Court of Common Pleas. The trial court sentenced Fogle to an eight-year prison term for his conviction for assembly or possession of chemicals to manufacture a controlled substance. {¶ 2} In 2007, Fogle began a relationship with Amber Stemple ("Stemple"). Initially, Fogle and Stempl

618 F.3d 1177 (2010) Pamela L. McKISSICK, an individual, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Henry C. YUEN, an individual; Elsie M. Leung, an individual, Defendants-Appellees, and Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc., Defendant/Counter-Claimant-Appellee. Nos. 08-5151, 09-5078. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. September 8, 2010.

PER CURIAM. Harrel Franklin Braddy, an inmate under sentence of death, appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Braddy also petitions, this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the postconviction court’s denial of relief for a new gu

Opinion of the Court SULLIVAN, Chief Judge: During May of 1988, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone at Fort Carson, Colorado. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine, in violation of Articles 81 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881 and 912a, respectively. He

Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of willfully burning an inhabited troop billet and making three false sworn statements. Seex Arts. 126 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 926 and 934, respectively. The Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence * in an unpublished opinion on A

622 F.Supp.2d 276 (2008) NATIONWIDE CONTRACTOR AUDIT SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-08. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. June 10, 2008. *278 Joseph Decker, Patrick R. Malone, Rachel E. Brown, Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir, Pittsbur

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal of a judgment of civil contempt. On April 7, 2011, John Doe was served with a subpoena duces tecum requiring him to appear before a Northern District of Florida grand jury and produce the unencrypted contents located on the hard drives of Doe’s laptop computers and five external hard drives.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NABIL SALAMA, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-1124-JTL ) IRWIN D. SIMON, JODI BUTTS, DAVID

954 A.2d 527 (2008) 402 N.J. Super. 392 R.L., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Kenneth VOYTAC, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant. No. A-1001-06T5. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 31, 2008. Decided September 5, 2008. *529 E. Carr Cornog III argued t

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NABIL SALAMA, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-1124-JTL ) IRWIN D. SIMON, JODI BUTTS, DAVID

PER CURIAM. Harrel Franklin Braddy appeals his first-degree murder conviction and sentence of death for the killing of Quatisha Maycock, as well as his convictions and sentences for related offenses. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm Bradd/s convictions and sentences. I. BACKGROUND The evidence presented at Braddy’

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00170-CR Sergio Hernandez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee