⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “PARRY v. STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931-04-16 · Published · cited 31× · 49 F.2d 681; 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3239
49 F.2d 681 (1931) ILLINOIS POWER & LIGHT CORPORATION v. HURLEY et al. No. 9006. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. April 16, 1931. Rehearing Denied May 26, 1931. *682 Thomas F. Doran, of Topeka, Kan., and E. Bentley Hamilton, of Peoria, Ill. (T. M. Pierce and Anderson, Gilbert & Wolfort, all of St
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before WOODARD, FULTON, and CRISFIELD, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Stephen P. HOWELL, Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 30, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01403-CV EDWINA OLIVER, Appellant V. PAUL SAADI, M.D., Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Cour
Idaho Supreme Court · 2014-06-17 · Published · cited 18× · 156 Idaho 449; 328 P.3d 429
EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Fremont County from an award of sanctions against the county prosecuting attorney under Rule 11(a)(1) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure. Because there is no legal basis for the award, we reverse. I. Factual Background.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
03/03/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 21, 2019 Session KRISTIN EDGE HUNT-CARDEN v. JASON VINCENT CARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 15D1915 Ward Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge ___________________________________
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2024-07-05 · Published · cited 3× · 551 P.3d 37
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,130 HODES & NAUSER, MDS, P.A.; and TRACI LYNN NAUSER, M.D., Appellees, v. KRIS KOBACH, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Kansas; and STEPHEN M
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-04-10 · Published · cited 53× · 522 F.3d 925; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7652; 2008 WL 962103
522 F.3d 925 (2008) COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS and Rebecca Restrepo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alice A. MOLASKY-ARMAN, in her official capacity as Nevada Commissioner of Insurance, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-17271. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 19, 2006. Filed April 10, 2008.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014-01-29 · Published · cited 43× · 742 F.3d 55; 109 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1535; 2014 WL 306240; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1775
OPINION GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. This case concerns Appellant Peter Brownsteiris claim under the Copyright Act seeking a declaratory judgment of joint authorship of an ethnic identification system that he created with Appellee Tina Lindsay, the Lindsay Cultural Identification Determinate (“LCID”). Lindsay purports to have conveyed the copyrights to th
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-07-30 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3127 JACIEL CIRRUS ROJAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SAMUEL OLSON, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and SCOTT SMITH, Jail Administrator, Dodge County Jail, Respondents-
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-07-30 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3127 JACIEL CIRRUS ROJAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SAMUEL OLSON, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and SCOTT SMITH, Jail Administrator, Dodge County Jail, Respondents-
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS &  BROKERS and REBECCA RESTREPO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 04-17271 v.  D.C. No. CV-02-00813-JCM ALICE A. MOLASKY-ARMAN, in her official capacity as Nevada OPINION Commissioner of Insurance,
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 0× · 142 F. Supp. 3d 910; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150630; 2015 WL 6747489
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings came on for hearing before this court on September 30, 2015. Plaintiffs appeared by their counsel James R. Parri-nello and Christopher E. Skinnell, and defendant appeared by its counsel Assistant San Francisco City Attorney Jeremy M. Goldman. Having read th
Covington v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
Timothy Aaron Covington v. State of Maryland, No. 939, September Term 2024. Opinion by Ripken, J. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION – CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – CONCURRENT JURISDICTION OF CIRCUIT COURT AND DISTRICT COURT – EFFECT OF JURY DEMAND Under section 4-301 and 4-302 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code, the District Court and circuit courts share concurrent subject matter jurisdiction over certain criminal actions, including statutory misdemeanors in which the penalty
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-04-10 · Published · cited 8× · 35 F. Supp. 3d 407; 2014 WL 1396492
OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: The Plaintiffs’ class actions allege that credit card issuers collusively adopted class-action-barring arbitration clauses in violation of the Sherman Act to prevent cardholders from redressing their injuries collectively through the courts. They seek injunctive relief prohibiting such clauses in cardholder agreements. Following the deni
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2004-08-16 · Published · cited 0× · 61 Fed. Cl. 593; 2004 U.S. Claims LEXIS 211; 2004 WL 1869932
OPINION CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after trial on plaintiffs claim that the United States, through the United States Postal Service, infringed plaintiffs patent covering imprinted money order forms. After the court ruled on the construction of the disputed language in claims 1, 5, 6, and 10, plaintiff sought to prove defendant’s liability and damages, while defenda
Caruso v. Brownpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 686 P.2d 996; 1984 OK CIV APP 36; 1984 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 126
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge. For review in this medical malpractice action is the trial court’s decision to grant defendants a summary judgment after apparently concluding the deposition of plaintiff established that the two-year statute of limitations prescribed in 76 O.S.1981 § 18 had run on plaintiffs’ causes of action. We hold the trial court misconstrued the statute and reverse the summary judgment.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002-08-28 · Published · cited 25× · 832 So. 2d 274; 2002 WL 1987412
832 So.2d 274 (2002) Craig WEST, Troy West, and W.B. Farms Inc., et al. v. G & H SEED COMPANY, et al. No. 01-1453. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. August 28, 2002. *276 Arthur W. Landry, PlauchÉ, Maselli, Landry and Parkerson, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellants, G &
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00525-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/2/2015 4:11:00 PM
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010-09-17 · Published · cited 434× · 621 F.3d 111; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19382
621 F.3d 111 (2010) Esther KIOBEL, individually and on behalf of her late husband, Dr. Barinem Kiobel, Bishop Augustine Numene John-Miller, Charles Baridorn Wiwa, Israel Pyakene Nwidor, Kendricks Dorle Nwikpo, Anthony B. Kote-Witah, Victor B. Wifa, Dumle J. Kunenu, Benson Magnus Ikari, Legbara Tony Idigima, Pius Nwinee, Kpobari Tusima, individually and on behalf of his late father, Clement Tusima, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. ROYAL D
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00028-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/7/2015 4:26:25 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE