Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “PARRY v. STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION”
Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. Hurleypublic domain
49 F.2d 681 (1931) ILLINOIS POWER & LIGHT CORPORATION v. HURLEY et al. No. 9006. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. April 16, 1931. Rehearing Denied May 26, 1931. *682 Thomas F. Doran, of Topeka, Kan., and E. Bentley Hamilton, of Peoria, Ill. (T. M. Pierce and Anderson, Gilbert & Wolfort, all of St
United States v. Howellpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before WOODARD, FULTON, and CRISFIELD, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Stephen P. HOWELL, Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 30, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01403-CV EDWINA OLIVER, Appellant V. PAUL SAADI, M.D., Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Cour
EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Fremont County from an award of sanctions against the county prosecuting attorney under Rule 11(a)(1) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure. Because there is no legal basis for the award, we reverse. I. Factual Background.
Kristin Edge Hunt-Carden v. Jason Vincent Cardenpublic domain
03/03/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 21, 2019 Session KRISTIN EDGE HUNT-CARDEN v. JASON VINCENT CARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 15D1915 Ward Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge ___________________________________
Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. Kobachpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,130 HODES & NAUSER, MDS, P.A.; and TRACI LYNN NAUSER, M.D., Appellees, v. KRIS KOBACH, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Kansas; and STEPHEN M
522 F.3d 925 (2008) COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS and Rebecca Restrepo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alice A. MOLASKY-ARMAN, in her official capacity as Nevada Commissioner of Insurance, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-17271. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 19, 2006. Filed April 10, 2008.
Peter Brownstein v. Tina Lindsaypublic domain
OPINION GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. This case concerns Appellant Peter Brownsteiris claim under the Copyright Act seeking a declaratory judgment of joint authorship of an ethnic identification system that he created with Appellee Tina Lindsay, the Lindsay Cultural Identification Determinate (“LCID”). Lindsay purports to have conveyed the copyrights to th
Jaciel Rojas v. Samuel Olsonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3127 JACIEL CIRRUS ROJAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SAMUEL OLSON, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and SCOTT SMITH, Jail Administrator, Dodge County Jail, Respondents-
Jaciel Rojas v. Samuel Olsonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-3127 JACIEL CIRRUS ROJAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SAMUEL OLSON, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and SCOTT SMITH, Jail Administrator, Dodge County Jail, Respondents-
Council of Insurance v. Molasky-Armanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS and REBECCA RESTREPO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 04-17271 v. D.C. No. CV-02-00813-JCM ALICE A. MOLASKY-ARMAN, in her official capacity as Nevada OPINION Commissioner of Insurance,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings came on for hearing before this court on September 30, 2015. Plaintiffs appeared by their counsel James R. Parri-nello and Christopher E. Skinnell, and defendant appeared by its counsel Assistant San Francisco City Attorney Jeremy M. Goldman. Having read th
Covington v. Statepublic domain
Timothy Aaron Covington v. State of Maryland, No. 939, September Term 2024. Opinion by Ripken, J. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION – CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – CONCURRENT JURISDICTION OF CIRCUIT COURT AND DISTRICT COURT – EFFECT OF JURY DEMAND Under section 4-301 and 4-302 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code, the District Court and circuit courts share concurrent subject matter jurisdiction over certain criminal actions, including statutory misdemeanors in which the penalty
Ross v. American Express Co.public domain
OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: The Plaintiffs’ class actions allege that credit card issuers collusively adopted class-action-barring arbitration clauses in violation of the Sherman Act to prevent cardholders from redressing their injuries collectively through the courts. They seek injunctive relief prohibiting such clauses in cardholder agreements. Following the deni
Paymaster Technologies, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after trial on plaintiffs claim that the United States, through the United States Postal Service, infringed plaintiffs patent covering imprinted money order forms. After the court ruled on the construction of the disputed language in claims 1, 5, 6, and 10, plaintiff sought to prove defendant’s liability and damages, while defenda
Caruso v. Brownpublic domain
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge. For review in this medical malpractice action is the trial court’s decision to grant defendants a summary judgment after apparently concluding the deposition of plaintiff established that the two-year statute of limitations prescribed in 76 O.S.1981 § 18 had run on plaintiffs’ causes of action. We hold the trial court misconstrued the statute and reverse the summary judgment.
West v. G & H SEED CO.public domain
832 So.2d 274 (2002) Craig WEST, Troy West, and W.B. Farms Inc., et al. v. G & H SEED COMPANY, et al. No. 01-1453. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. August 28, 2002. *276 Arthur W. Landry, PlauchÉ, Maselli, Landry and Parkerson, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellants, G &
ACCEPTED 04-15-00525-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/2/2015 4:11:00 PM
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.public domain
621 F.3d 111 (2010) Esther KIOBEL, individually and on behalf of her late husband, Dr. Barinem Kiobel, Bishop Augustine Numene John-Miller, Charles Baridorn Wiwa, Israel Pyakene Nwidor, Kendricks Dorle Nwikpo, Anthony B. Kote-Witah, Victor B. Wifa, Dumle J. Kunenu, Benson Magnus Ikari, Legbara Tony Idigima, Pius Nwinee, Kpobari Tusima, individually and on behalf of his late father, Clement Tusima, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. ROYAL D
Michael Justin Jacobs v. Adana Altpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-15-00028-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/7/2015 4:26:25 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE