Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN BEJARANO, No. 11-99000 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:98-cv-01016- v. PMP-RJJ WILLIAM REUBART, Warden, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr

ACCEPTED 05-18-00647-CV 05-18-00647-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 05-18-00647-CV 05-18-00647-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 05-18-00647-CV 05-18-00647-cv Part 1 of 5 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

FRIEDLANDER, Judge. [1] John R. Myers II appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). He raises the following restated issues on appeal: 1. Did the post-conviction court err in concluding that Myers was not denied the effective assistance of trial counsel? 2. Did the pos

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ Nos. 06-3476/3513 ________________ Jerry Mark, * * Appellee/Cross-Appellant, * * v. *

906 So.2d 303 (2005) J.S.U.B., INC., as partner of First Home Builders of Florida, a joint venture and Logue Enterprises, Inc., as partner of First Home Builders of Florida, a joint venture, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee. No. 2D03-134. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 18, 2005. Rehearing

297 F.Supp.2d 463 (2003) NORBROOK LABORATORIES LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. G.C. HANFORD MANUFACTURING COMPANY doing business as Hanford Pharmaceuticals, Defendant. No. 5:03-CV-165 (HGM/GLS). United States District Court, N.D. New York. December 3, 2003. *464 *465 Hogan & Hartson, LLP, New York,

807 F.2d 633 25 ERC 1406, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,429 Loren VAN ABBEMA and Barbara Van Abbema, and Edward R.Koeber and Mary D. Koeber, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Paul FORNELL, d/b/a Warsaw Barge Loading Facility; John O.Marsh, Secretary of the Army, and Lt. Gen. J.K.Bratton, Chief of Engineers, Departmentof the Army, Defendants-Appellees.Loren VAN ABBEMA and Barbara Van Abbema, and Edward R.Ko

Finch, J. The judgment sought against the defendant is one of corporate death. The State, which created, asks us to destroy, and the penalty invoked represents the extreme rigor of the law. Its infliction must rest upon grave cause, and be warranted by material misconduct. The life - of a corporation is indeed less than that of the humblest citizen, and yet it envelopes great accumulations of property, moves and carries in large vo

GILBERT, Circuit Judge. An application for a temporary restraining order is made upon the bill of the- Spring Valley Water Company, the answer of the city and county of San Francisco and the board of supervisors thereof, and the affidavits submitted on behalf of the respective parties. The substantial averments of the bill are the following: That on March 7, 1904, the board of supervisors of said city and coun

[Cite as State v. Smith, 2019-Ohio-2300.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee :

09/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 8, 2021 JEFFREY WAYNE HUGHES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lawrence County Nos. 33792, 34049, 35711 Russell Parkes, Judge ___________________________________

12/02/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 23, 2019 DANNY SANTARONE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. C66904 James F. Goodwin, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

05/20/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 24, 2019 Session BENDALE ROMERO v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 109928 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2018-00404-CCA-R3-PC The petitioner, Bendale R

10/11/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 28, 2022 JERRY BURKES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Greene County No. 20CR286 Alex E. Pearson, Judge _____________

851 A.2d 1280 (2004) UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Robert J. LITTLE, Jr., Appellee. No. 03-CO-452. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 26, 2004. Decided June 24, 2004. *1281 Barbara J. Valliere, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Roscoe C. *1282 Howa

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. In 2001, William Cecil Romig pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (b)(1)(A) and 846. He was sentenced to 264 months imprisonment, later reduced to 240 months, followed by 10 y

STOWERS, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A man who assisted at a concrete-pouring job was assaulted by another worker at the job site. The injured man filed a lawsuit against his assailant as well as both the concrete-pouring company and its owner. Although the company's commercial general liability insurer initially provided a defense attorney in the negligence act

KONDUROS, J. In this case involving section 17-28-30 of the South Carolina Code (2014), which provides for post-conviction DNA testing, Orlando Smith appeals the circuit court’s application of the seven-year time limit for defendants who pled guilty or no contest. He argues he pled not guilty and the statute contains no time limit for those defendants. We reverse and remand. In July 2000, Smith was tried