Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “PEGGY DAWN RAY”
Ray v. Lesniakpublic domain
DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Raven Renee Ray ("Ray") brought this admiralty action against Defendant Steve A. Lesniak ("Lesniak") pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(h). Ray is suing Lesniak for personal injuries and other damages she sustained as a result of being struck by the main *471sheet during a saili
San Jacinto River Authority v. Andy Raypublic domain
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H
Cite as 2023 Ark. 165 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-95 Opinion Delivered: November 16, 2023 RELIANCE HEALTH CARE, INC.; OVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI RHC OPERATIONS, INC.; EAGLE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; GNNC, INC., [NO. 47BCV-19-236] D/B/A GOSNELL THERAPY AND LIVING; SRCNC, INC., D/B/A THE HONORABLE TAN
Baskin v. Boganpublic domain
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Amy Sandler and Nikole (“Niki”) Quasney, ask this court to grant a temporary restraining order requiring the state of Indiana to recognize their out-of-state marriage. The court held a hearing on April 10, 2014, and issued a bench ruling GRANTING the temporary restraining order, which expires 28 day
Baskin v. Boganpublic domain
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Amy Sandler (“Amy”), Nikole (“Niki”) Quasney, A.Q.-S. and M.Q.-S asked this court to grant them a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and a preliminary injunction requiring the State of Indiana to recognize the out-of-state marriage of Amy and Niki. (Filing No. 31). The court granted the TRO, which expir
Estate & Last Will & Testament of Rutland v. Rutlandpublic domain
24 So.3d 347 (2009) In the Matter of the ESTATE and Last Will and Testament OF Willie Ray RUTLAND, Diane Rutland Nations, Gregory Rutland, Peggy Rutland Jones and Calvin Rutland, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Rickie Dale RUTLAND and Todd Rutland, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 2008-CA-01671-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. December 8, 2009.
Baskin v. Boganpublic domain
ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge. The court has before it three cases, Baskin v. Bogan, Fujii v. Pence, and Lee v. Pence. All three allege that Indiana Code Section 31-11-1-1 (“Section 31-11-1-1”), which defines marriage as between one man and one woman and voids marriages between same-sex persons, is facially unconstitutional. Plaintiffs in th
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Webb v. Nash General Hospitalpublic domain
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence affirms in part, and reverses in part the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fa
Matter of Quevedopublic domain
419 S.E.2d 158 (1992) 106 N.C. App. 574 In the Matter of Jeanette Ray QUEVEDO, Marilyn Dawn Quevedo. No. 9122DC442. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 7, 1992. *159 Mills and Allen by John A. Hauser, Thomasville, for respondent-appellant. Snow & Skager by Philip R. Skager, High Point, for petition
Governor v. Nevada State Legislaturepublic domain
71 P.3d 1269 (2003) Honorable Kenny GUINN, Governor of the State of Nevada, Petitioner, v. The LEGISLATURE OF The STATE OF NEVADA; Honorable Lorraine T. Hunt, President of the Senate; Honorable Richard D. Perkins, Speaker of the Assembly; Mark E. Amodei, Senator; Terry Care, Senator; Maggie Carlton, Senator; Barbara Cegavske, Senator; Bob Coffin, Senator; Warren B. Hardy, Senator; Bernice Mathews, Senator; Mike McGinness, Senator; Joseph M. Neal,
Washington v. CSC Credit Services Inc.public domain
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellees Bernita and Kevin Washington (the “Washingtons”), Peggy and Ray Malbrough (the “Malbroughs”), and Bernice and Vernon Guichard (the “Guichards”) (collectively, the “consumers”) allege that defendants-appellants CSC Credit Services, Inc. (“CSC”) and Equifax Inc. (“Equifax”) (collectively, the “reporting agencies”) violated the F
Governor v. Nevada State Legislaturepublic domain
76 P.3d 22 (2003) Honorable Kenny GUINN, Governor of the State of Nevada, Petitioner, v. The LEGISLATURE OF the STATE OF NEVADA; Honorable Lorraine T. Hunt, President of the Senate; Honorable Richard D. Perkins, Speaker of the Assembly; Mark E. Amodei, Senator; Terry Care, Senator; Maggie Carlton, Senator; Barbara Cegavske, Senator; Bob Coffin, Senator; Warren B. Hardy, Senator; Bernice Mathews, Senator; Mike McGinness, Senator; Joseph M. Neal, J
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
Martin v. Peoplepublic domain
Justice MARTINEZ delivered the Opinion of the Court. In this case we consider whether the court of appeals erred by affirming the trial court's *848denial of the defendant's Crim. P. 35(c) motion, and holding that a defendant convicted of a sexual assault occurring in July 1998 is subject to a mandatory five-year period of parole in addition to a period of
Lynn v. Anderson-Varellapublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 30, 2007 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
Teague v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;
James Dellinger v.State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 25, 2015 JAMES DELLINGER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. C14432 David Reed Duggan, Judge No. E2013-02094-CCA-R3-ECN – Filed August 18, 2015 The Petitioner, James Dellinger, appeals from the trial court‘s denial of his petition for a wr