⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “PEREZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON”

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2020-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00082-CV ___________________________ TEODORO PEREZ, Appellant V. DINA RENEE JOHNSON, Appellee On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096-288801-16 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2020-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-19-00082-CV TEODORO PEREZ, Appellant § On Appeal from the 96th District Court § of Tarrant County (096-288801-16) V. § September 17, 2020 DINA RENEE JOHNSON, Appelle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 NY Slip Op 4619; 151 A.D.3d 1654; 56 N.Y.S.3d 712
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered October 23, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, denied the petition of petitioner-respondent seeking modification of a prior custody order granting respondent-petitioner sole legal and primary physical custody of the subject children. It is her
Perez v. Johnsonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010-04-13 · Published · cited 2× · 72 A.D.3d 777; 898 N.Y.S.2d 655
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered September 26, 2008, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Lamont E. Johnson on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury w
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
MANDATE The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00125-CV Jeremiah Perez, Appellant v. Hill College, Johnson County and Joshua Independent School District, Appellees Appealed from the 249th District Court of Johnson County. (Trial Court No. DC- T202300308). Opinion delivered Per Curiam. TO THE 249TH DISTRICT
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
BILL OF COSTS TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTEENTH DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN No. 15-24-00125-CV Jeremiah Perez v. Hill College, Johnson County and Joshua Independent School District (No. DC-T202300308 IN 249TH DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY) TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
February 20, 2025 JUDGMENT The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00125-CV JEREMIAH PEREZ, Appellant V. HILL COLLEGE, JOHNSON COUNTY AND JOSHUA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellees ________________________________ This c
Perez v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997-07-31 · Published · cited 5× · 122 F.3d 1067; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23468; 1997 WL 464599
122 F.3d 1067 Perezv.Johnson NO. 96-20135 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 31, 1997 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. ,No. 2 Affirmed.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 523 U.S. 1008; 118 S. Ct. 1193; 140 L. Ed. 2d 323; 66 U.S.L.W. 3591; 1998 U.S. LEXIS 1698
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Johnson v. Perezpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-09-02 · Published · cited 17× · 66 F. Supp. 3d 30; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121856; 2014 WL 4311265
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Prince Johnson is an African-American man who was employed for approximately seven months — from April 2, 2006, until November 11, 2006 — as a Veterans Employment Specialist in the Veterans Employment and Training Services (“VETS”) division of the Department of Lab
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 20, 2025. In The Fifteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 15-24-00125-CV ____________ JEREMIAH PEREZ, Appellant V. HILL COLLEGE, JOHNSON COUNTY AND JOSHUA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, A
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-10-26 · Published · cited 2× · 322 F.R.D. 439
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiffs Johnson & Johnson International and Ethicon, Inc. (collectively, “J&JI”)’s motion for reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). (Docket No. 63.) J&JI requests that the Court reconsider its Opinion and Order compelling arbitration and staying all claims pendin
Johnson v. Perezpublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011-06-15 · Published · cited 0× · 23 A.3d 542
23 A.3d 542 (2011) JOHNSON v. PEREZ. Nos. 221 & 222 WAL (2011). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. June 15, 2011. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-05-20 · Published · cited 124× · 422 U.S. App. D.C. 385; 823 F.3d 701; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9229; 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,559; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 237; 2016 WL 2941965
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD. PILLARD, Circuit Judge: Prince Johnson, an African American temporary employee of the U.S. Department of Labor, sued the Department, claiming that it dismissed him from his position as a Veterans Employment Specialist because of his race in violation of Title VII. The district court saw grounds to dou
Perez v. Abbottpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2017-08-24 · Published · cited 2× · 267 F. Supp. 3d 750
ORDER ON PLAN H358 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ statutory and constitutional claims against Plan H358, enacted by the 83rd Texas Legislature in 2013. The following Plaintiffs assert claims against Plan H358: The Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force1 (limited to HD90), MALC,2 th
Perez v. Avilespublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-05-24 · Published · cited 9× · 188 F. Supp. 3d 328; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68139; 2016 WL 3017399
OPINION & ORDER JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge Petitioner Alexis Perez, a non-citizen who is currently in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging DHS’s authority to detain him *330without bond. For the reasons set forth below,
Perez v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016-05-25 · Published · cited 5× · 2016 Ark. App. 291; 494 S.W.3d 431; 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 312
KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge | Appellant Juan Perez was convicted of three counts of rape committed against K.W., who was ten or eleven years old when the offenses were committed. Mr. Perez was sentenced to three concurrent twenty-five-year prison terms. On appeal, Mr. Perez argues that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion for dire
Perez v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014-05-14 · Published · cited 30× · 429 S.W.3d 639; 2014 WL 1909500; 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 742
WOMACK, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, HERVEY, COCHRAN, and ALCALA, JJ., joined. The appellant, Ramon Perez, was convicted of three counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child by contact. He was sentenced to life in prison for
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 128 A.D.3d 1469; 7 N.Y.S.3d 919
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered October 15, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied petitioner’s objection to the order of the Support Magistrate. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding
Perez v. Perrypublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2011-11-23 · Published · cited 2× · 835 F. Supp. 2d 209; 2011 WL 6202897; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155598
*211ORDER ORLANDO L. GARCIA and XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judges. The court, by majority, adopts PLAN H302 as the interim plan for the districts used to elect members in 2012 to the Texas House of Representatives. A map showing the redrawn districts in PLAN H302 is attached to this Order as Exhibit A. The textual description in terms of census geogra