Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION John T. Laney, III, United States Bankruptcy Judge This Adversary Proceeding is before the Court to rule on the underlying legal issue as a matter of law per the parties’ request. The parties filed statements of uncontest*443ed facts and briefs. In its brief, the Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), requested oral a

*828OPINION OF THE COURT Thomas F. Whelan, J. Ordered that this motion (No. 001) by the plaintiff for the entry of a default judgment on its complaint seeking a declaration that it owns a certain mortgage, that defendants’ rights and interests under the mortgage, if any, are subordinate to those of the plaintiff and for an order and judgment directing

JANE P. WISEMAN, Presiding Judge. T1 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., appeals an order of the trial court denying its motion to vacate the dismissal with prejudice of its foreclosure action against Theresa Kindle and Eldridge Kindle. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to vacate. After review of the record and applicable law, we conclu

*198Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sheri Daniel appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), her state-law claims of fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, unjust enrichment,

Hines, Justice. This Court granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Jenkins v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., 314 Ga. App. 257 (724 SE2d 1) (2012), to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that a violation of an alleged duty imposed by 15 USC § 6801 (a), which is part of the Gramm-Leach-BlileyAct (“GLBA”), 15 USC § 6801 et seq., gives rise to a cause of action for negligence under OCGA § 51-1-6. For the

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Nancy Harrison brought suit against her employer Wells Fargo, arguing that the company improperly terminated her short-term disability benefits while she was undergoing a series of treatments for thyr

POLSTON, J. This case is before the Court for review of two questions of Florida law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that are determinative of a cause pending in that court and for which that court has indicated there appears to be no controlling precedent.1 *1203In this dispu

ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) motion for security for costs pursuant to NRS 118.130(1). ECF No. 9. This case involves a homeowners association’s (“HOA”) non-judicial foreclosure of real property in Sparks, Nevada. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank is the beneficiary of the subject property’s deed o

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Defendant for Sanctions:"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: * Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo” or “the bank”) has been attempting to foreclose on this fraudulently procured home equity loan for nearly a decade. When the bank finally obtained a judgment from the bankruptcy court purporting to “lift the automatic stay” concerning debtor Eric Erickson’s homestead, Erickson did not file a timely notice of appeal. His attorney, however, obt

CANADY, J. In this case we consider whether a municipal ordinance may validly establish su-perpriority status for municipal code enforcement liens. In City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 57 So.3d 226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), the Fifth District Court of Appeal concluded that such an ordinance superpriority provision is invalid because it conflicts with a state statute and that the City’s lien accordingly did not ha

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo) appeals from the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of Joel and Tanya Karnitz, who brought this action seeking a declaration that the mortgage held by Wells Fargo on their residence is invalid under Minnesota Statute § 507.02. We agree with Wells Fargo that given the undisputed facts of this case, the Karnitzes should be estopped from relying on § 5

SUBSTITUTE OPINION. THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED DECEMBER 29, 2015, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN. BURDICK, Justice. Charles and Gail Houpt (Houpts) appeal the Bonneville County district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Bank National Association (Wells Fargo Bank) and First American Title Company (FATCO). In dis

[Cite as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Coil, 2024-Ohio-4908.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113633 v. SANDRA ALLEN COIL, ET AL., :

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Eliacin (2022 NY Slip Op 04042) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Eliacin 2022 NY Slip Op 04042 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Breuer (2022 NY Slip Op 02037) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Breuer 2022 NY Slip Op 02037 Decided on March 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

[Cite as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Coil, 2021-Ohio-1814.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109861 v. : SANDRA ALLEN COIL, AKA SANDRA COIL

306 B.R. 287 (2004) In re Danny Ray YETT and Frances Ann Yett, Debtors. Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A., Appellant, v. Danny Ray Yett; Frances Ann Yett, Appellees. BAP No. ID-03-1250-BKMu, Bankruptcy No. 02-03054. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 20, 2003. Filed January 27, 2004.

SINGER, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, Hollies P. Mayo, appeals from the December 31, 2015 judgment of the Erie County Court of Common Pleas granting appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee for the Certificate Holders of Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-FRE1 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates (hereinafter "Wells Fargo"), judgment on a promissory note in the amount of $92,306.82 an

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order sua sponte dismissing their complaint against Defendants for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Allran v. Wells Fargo, No. 3:10-cv-00200-GCM