Cases

ORDER BRIAN J. DAVIS, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint [Docs. 141, 145, 154, and 156; Motions]. Plaintiffs responded with their Consolidated Brief in Opposition [Doc. 159]. Accordingly, this matter is ripe for review. I. BACKGROUND1 Plain

United States Tax Court 160 T.C. No. 3 3M COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 5816-13. Filed February 9, 2023. ————— P is the common parent company of the P consolidated group. As

Reyna, Circuit Judge. *1380 Westech Aerosol Corporation appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granting 3M Company and GTA-NHT, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for improper venue. 3M Company and GTA-NHT, Inc. subsequently moved for attorne

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1709 STATE OF MAINE, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 3M COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court John A. Tibbs and Margaret B. Tibbs, Respondents, v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.; A.O. Smith Corporation; A. W. Chesterton Company; ABB Inc.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation; AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp.; Amentum Environment & Energy, Inc.; Anchor/Darling Valve Company; Armstrong International, Inc.; Asbestos Corporation Limited ASCO, L.P.; Atlas Asbestos Co.; Atlas Turner, Inc.; AWT Air Company, Inc.; Bahnson, Inc.; Banner I

MEMORANDUM, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: This action arises out of the acquisition in late 2006 and early 2007 by Plaintiff Meda AB (“Meda”) of a European pharmaceutical business from Defendant 3M Company (“3M”). Meda alleges that 3M breached the acquisition agreement signed on November 8, 2006 (“Acquisition Agreement”), as well as the implied covenant of good faith and fair deali

*158ORDER DAVID W. DANIEL, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Florida Power & Light Company’s (“FP & L”) motion to compel Plaintiffs’1 production of certain unredacted documents [CP & L DE-559; Consol DE-556]. Plaintiffs have responded [CP & L DE-567; Consol DE-5

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Richard Pierce has a debilitating and deadly disease known as silicosis. Having worked for many years as a sandblaster, preparing surfaces for painting, Pierce sued, among multiple defendants, sellers of sand including Dependable Abrasives, alleging that Dependable’s failure to provide adequate warnings of the dangers of the inhalation of respirable silica caused his silicosis and rende

638 S.E.2d 787 (2006) TULLIS DEVELOPMENTS, INC. v. 3M CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al. No. A06A1559. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 8, 2006. *788 Robert J. Wilson, Ryan K. Patrick, Webb, Tanner & Powell, Mertz & Wilson, Lawrenceville, for appellant. Gregory W. Lancaster, Buford, for appellees. RUFFIN, Chief

FULLER, Chief District Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Don Peebles (“Pee-bles”) sought to vacate a zero dollar arbitration award by filing a Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. Contending that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) provided a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction, Defendant-appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00058-CV HEB GROCERY COMPANY L.P., Appellant v. Maria Del Rosario DEL CID,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2705 ___________ Donaldson Company, Inc., * * Plaintiff – Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

Lisa S. Van Amburg, Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of defendants Frank J. Miceli, in his individual capacity and as trustee of the Frank Miceli Revocable Trust,. the unknown beneficiaries of said trust, Stephen Miceli, in his individual capacity

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 98-3010 & 98-3817 Lowell E. Harter and Doretta Harter, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Iowa Grain Co., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 96 C 2936--Milton I. Shadur, Judge. Argued September 13, 1999--Decided April 21, 2000 Before Posner, Chief Judge, and Cudahy and Kanne, Circuit Judges. Cudahy, Circuit Judge. The r

21 Ariz. App. 400 (1974) 519 P.2d 1165 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY and Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., Appellants, v. Virginia GAMMONS, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CIV 2156. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1. March 19, 1974. Rehearing Denied April 11, 1974. *401 Snell & Wilme

*1258DAVIS, Circuit Judge. This appeal discloses a continued series of efforts to avoid compliance with a default judgment of patent infringement against appellant Eco-Chem Inc. (ECI). In the court below (the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota) these attempts were unsuccessful. Nor do they prevail in this court. After fully appraising appellan

825 F.2d 482 263 U.S.App.D.C. 345, 56 USLW 2116,17 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,223,13 O.S.H. Cas.(BNA) 1353,1987 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 27,997 NATIONAL COTTONSEED PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner,v.William E. BROCK, Secretary of Labor, United StatesDepartment of Labor and Eula Bingham, Assistant Secretary ofLabor, United States Department of Labor; OccupationalSafety and Health Administration, United St

643 F.Supp. 1229 (1986) George COLEMAN and Juanita Bruce, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and General Electric Ceramics, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 1-84-534. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, S.D. June 5, 1986.[*] Corrected June

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HARVINDER SINGH, No. 17-35964 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-00287- JCC AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. HARVINDER SINGH, No. 17-35967 Plaintiff-Appellan

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 This case raises the following question: When may a nonresident parent company be haled into a Colorado court based on the activities of its resident subsidiary? We hold that, to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident parent company, a trial court shall perform the following analysis: First