Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 581 MAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 561 EAL 2019 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 333 MAL 2017 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : :

DISSENTING OPINION BY President Judge PELLEGRINI. Until 2012, Section 6138(a) of the Prisons and Parole Code (Parole Code), 61 Pa.C.S. § 6138(a), required that when a parolee was recommitted as a convicted parole violator, no matter what the nature of the crime, the parolee did not receive credit for the time that he or she spent at liberty on parole. However, in 2012, the

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 925 MAL 2014 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court v. : : : SHANE DOUGLAS PITTMAN, :

737 A.2d 272 (1999) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Gabriel I. PITTMAN, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 27, 1999. Filed July 29, 1999. *273 Craig B. Neely, Allentown, for appellant. Douglas G. Reichley, Asst. Dist. Atty., Allentown, for Commonwealth, appellee. Before DEL SOLE, MONT

JUSTICE MUNDY, Concurring and Dissenting I join the Majority’s conclusion that in this case the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole abused its discretion by failing to consider whether to grant Appellant, a convicted parole violator (CPV), credit for time spent at liberty on parole pursuant to 61 Pa.C.S. § 6138(a)(2.1). However, because I do not agree that the Board must no

*274OPINION OF THE COURT FLAHERTY, Justice. The firearms-related mandatory sentencing provision of Pennsylvania’s Sentencing Code provides that a person who visibly possessed a firearm during the commission of certain enumerated felonies shall be sentenced to at least five years of confinement, provided that after conviction but before sentencing the

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

320 Pa. Superior Ct. 166 (1983) 466 A.2d 1370 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Robert PITTMAN, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 4, 1982. Filed October 14, 1983. *169 John J. Kevlock, Philadelphia, for appellant. Garold E. Tennis, Assistant District Attorney, Philadelphia, for Comm

Order affirmed.

295 Pa. Superior Ct. 234 (1982) 441 A.2d 436 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Gary Allen PITTMAN, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 13, 1981. Filed February 12, 1982. *235 *236 Vincent J. Roskovensky, II, Uniontown, for appellant. Gerald R.

Judgment of sentence affirmed. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

OPINION Before JACOBS, President Judge, and HOFFMAN, CER-CONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and HESTER, JJ. PER CURIAM: The order dismissing appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act Petition is vacated and the record remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County for a counselled evidentiary hearing. For the purposes of this hearing, counsel must be appointed from an of

VAN der VOORT, Judge: Appeal is taken from judgment of sentence rendered after jury trial and verdict of guilty to a charge of criminal conspiracy, the lower court having sustained defendant’s demurrer to a charge of resisting arrest and having ruled a *148third charge of disorderly conduct to be a summary offense made the subject of a separate adjudication of guilty.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT GABRIEL PITTMAN, : No. 6 MAP 2024 : Appellant : Appeal from the order of the : Commonwealth Court at No. 476 : MD 2022 dated January 2, 2024. v. :

147 Argued and submitted July 30, 2018, affirmed October 16, 2019, petition for review allowed March 5, 2020 (366 Or 257) See later issue Oregon Reports STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CATRICE PITTMAN, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court