Cases

DiFIORE, Chief Judge: In this personal injury action, we are asked to resolve a dispute concerning disclosure of materials from plaintiff's Facebook account. Plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she fell from a horse owned by defendant, suffering spinal and traumatic brain injuries resulting in cognitive deficits, memory loss, difficulties with written and oral communication, and social isolation. At her dep

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL ARONOVITZ, District Judge. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief and preliminary and permanent injunctions, holding Article II, Sec. 2.01 D* of the Home *409Rule Charter of Broward County, Florida to be facially unconstitutional and unenforceable in his p

SPAETH, Judge, concurring and dissenting: I agree that this case should be remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was properly committed for extended involuntary emergency treatment under 50 P.S. § 7301 et seq. (Supp. 1978-79). I also agree, but for different reasons explained below, that at that hearing appellant’s husband may testify. I dis

163 N.W.2d 894 (1969) 183 Neb. 715 Edward FORMAN, Appellant, v. Earl ANDERSON, Appellee. No. 36961. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 17, 1969. *895 Robert M. Snell, Lyle C. Winkle, Columbus, for appellant. Ray C. Simmons, Fremont, for appellee. Heard before WHITE, C. J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH,

Monroe, J., The issue before us is whether the discontinuance of the above entitled action, entered by the prothonotary as a matter of course on praecipe of plaintiffs, should be stricken. The action is one of trespass instituted by plaintiffs, husband and wife, on July 8, 1965, by filing of a complaint wherein damages are sought of defendant for alleged personal injuries incurred by wife-plaintiff, and deriva

HASTIE, Circuit Judge. These two proceedings have the single purpose of obtaining a review of an order of the District Court for the District of New Jersey denying a defense motion to dismiss the complaint in a civil action for money damages. On its face the complaint states a familiar type of claim for trebl

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on account of the failure to prove the judgment roll in the Birdsall v. Baird foreclosure proceedings, as a foundation for the referee’s deed. As to plaintiff and third persons, the recitals in a deed by the referee in foreclosure cannot establish the judicial proceedings, so that without the judgment roll the referee’s deed was unsupported, and did not pass the Baird title

MORRIS, Judge. Appellants — Fundamental Long Term Care Holdings, LLC, Murray Forman, and Leonard Grunstein — appeal a nonfinal order denying their motion to dismiss proceedings supplementary initiated against them by the estate of Juanita Jackson (the Estate). In denying the motion to dismiss, the trial court rejected appellants’ argument that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction because the appellants never received s

OPINION OF THE COURT H. Miller, J.P. In this case, we are asked to decide whether the plaintiffs complaint alleges sufficient facts to allow the Supreme Court, Westchester County, at this stage of the action, to exercise personal jurisdiction over the appellants—three nonresident, former branch managers of a New York-based corporation, who are alleged to have breached their respective employment agreement

892 F.Supp. 451 (1995) Michael J. AFFRUNTI, L. Donald Jaffin, John L. Molloy, Jr., Edward S. Smith, and Kathleen W. Forman, Plaintiffs, v. Benjamin L. ZWIRN, May W. Newburger, Anthony D'Urso and Barbara J. Johnson, as individuals and in their capacity as members of the Town Board of North Hempstead, and the Town of North Hempstead, Defendants. No. 92 CV 1512 (TCP). United States District Court, E.D. Ne

Bradley v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. (2022 NY Slip Op 00165) Bradley v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. 2022 NY Slip Op 00165 Decided on January 12, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New

Bradley v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. (2022 NY Slip Op 00164) Bradley v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. 2022 NY Slip Op 00164 Decided on January 12, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New

Green v Price Chopper, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 05578) Green v Price Chopper, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 05578 Decided on August 1, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau purs

Bradley v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. (2019 NY Slip Op 02054) Bradley v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. 2019 NY Slip Op 02054 Decided on March 20, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New Yo

804 P.2d 290 (1990) PLATTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ORGANIZATION, INC., a Colorado non-profit corporation, Equus Farms, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and Peter H. Coors, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. NATIONAL HOG FARMS, INC., a Colorado corporation, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, and The Weld County Board of Adjustment, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89CA1592. Colorado Cou

GRIFFIS, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Percy Tate appeals the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision to deny benefits on the ground that Tate failed to offer sufficient medical evidence to show the injuries were work-related. We find no error and affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2. In 1974, Tate started working for International Paper Company. He held

OPINION AND ORDER LEISURE, District Judge. This diversity action arises out of the collapse of the ceiling of the Murray Hill Cinema (“Murray Hill” or “Cinema”) on July 15,1986. The case is currently before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Sutton Hill Associates (“SHA”), a California general partnership, seeks summary judgment in its action to recover the proceeds of an

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Mack-Cali Realty Corp. v. State of New Jersey (A-8/9/10/11-21) (085465) (NOTE: The Court did not write a plenary opinion in this case. The Court affirms the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially fo

Case: 20-2262 Document: 77 Page: 1 Filed: 11/16/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CUPP COMPUTING AS, Appellant v. TREND MICRO INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PA- TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. *581 On June 16, 2015, Calissio Resources Group, Inc., an issuer of penny stock engaged in foreign mining activities, announced a first-ever quarterly dividend of 1.1 cents per share, payable August 17 to holders of issued and outstanding Class A common stock on June