Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “POLLARD v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS”
Pollard v. Quest Diagnosticspublic domain
610 F.Supp.2d 1 (2009) Bridget POLLARD, Plaintiff, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-692 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 17, 2009. *7 Nathaniel D. Johnson, Laplata, MD, for Plaintiff. Michael L. Stevens, Arent Fox, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant. ME
Pollard v. Quest Diagnosticspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIDGET POLLARD, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 07-692 (CKK) v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 17, 2009) Plaintiff, Bridget Pollard (“Pollard” or “Plaintiff”), an African-American female, brings th
HAROLD KRUEGER v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.public domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HAROLD KRUEGER, ) ) Appellant, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TYLER FRICK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-03222 (UNA) ) COUNCIL OF THE INSPECTORS )
Beaulieu v. Holderpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVETTE B. BEAULIEU, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-896 (TJK) MERRICK B. GARLAND, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Yvette B. Beaulieu is a former Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) employee who sued over 60 government officials for various f
Banker v. Wormuthpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GEORGE R. BANKER, Plaintiff, v. No. 22-cv-01445 (DLF) MARK AVERILL, ACTING SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER George Banker brings this discrimination action against Mark Averill, the Acting Secreta
Dunning v. Warepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (May 21st, 2017) [# 36] RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Leonard E. Dunning (“Dunning” or “plaintiff’), filed the instant action alleging that defendant, Nancy M. Ware (“Ware” or “defendant”), in her capacity as director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (“CSOSA” or “the
D'Andrea v. Paragon Systems, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANET D’ANDREA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2821 (TJK) PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Janet D’Andrea sues her former employer Defendant Paragon Systems, Inc., for sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of t
Pitt v. Dukepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARY R. PITT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2466 (TJK) ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS,1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Mary Pitt challenges the Department of Homeland Security’s decisions not to promote her to two different positions and to fill a th
Tyes-Williams v. Sessionspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARY TYES-WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1191 (TJK) MERRICK GARLAND,1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, an African-American woman employed by the Bureau of Prisons’ chaplaincy services, sues her employer. She asserts that in selecting a
Davis v. Perduepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROSETTA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-245 (TJK) TOM VILSACK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rosetta Davis, a former Department of Agriculture employee, brings several claims under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act. According to Davis, the De
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDY JACKSON-PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1880 (JDB) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Judy Jackson-Pringle brings this claim against her employer, Washi
Beberman v. Blinkenpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JULIE BEBERMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-3082 (TJK) ANTONY BLINKEN in his official capacity as Secretary of State, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Shortly after Julie Beberman began adjudicating visa applications in Venezuela for the U.S
Menoken v. Weichertpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) CASSANDRA M. MENOKEN, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-0083 (ABJ) ) MARGARET WEICHERT
Abbott v. Roundspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELAINE ABBOTT, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2717 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell JAMIESON GREER, Acting Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics, Defend
Baylor v. Yellenpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KAREN BAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2647 (TJK) JEROME H. POWELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Karen Baylor is an African-American woman who was employed as a benefits administrator for the Federal Reserve System’s Board of Governors. She in
Green v. Fishbone Safety Solutions, Ltd.public domain
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Hoffmann-La Roche Notice [Docket No. 62], Defendant Fishbone Safety Solutions, Ltd.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Charles Young [Docket No. 73], Defendants William S. Cain and BSC Interest, LLC's Conditional Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Michael Green and Ch
Laquan Johnson v. Elaine Terrypublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-11394 Document: 50-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024 Page: 1 of 43 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11394 ____________________ LAQUAN JOHNSON,
Sorrell v. Paige Industrial Services, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CORRY D. SORRELL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-2004 (TJK) PAIGE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Corry Sorrell contends that his former employer improperly paid him as a laborer instead of an electrician, assigned him
Ritchie v. Napolitanopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Scott Ritchie brings suit under (i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) for race discrimination; (ii) Title VII for gender discrimination; and (iii) the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA”) for age discrimination. (Compl. ¶¶ 25-33). Ritchie, an unass