Cases

729 F.Supp.2d 357 (2010) Michelle PRESCOTT, et al., Plaintiffs v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil No. 09-322-P-H. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 27, 2010. *359 Nicholas Bull, Edward S. MacColl, Thompson, Bull, Furey, Bass & MacColl, LLC, P.A., Portland, ME, Timothy B. Fleming, Wiggins, Childs, Qui

215 Md. 87 (1957) 136 A.2d 752 CHAPMAN v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. [No. 77, September Term, 1957.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided December 17, 1957. *89 The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ. Jack Pinkston, for

This is an action at law brought by the beneficiary to enforce the provisions of a life insurance policy issued to Jerry Prescott on October 5, 1931, by the Prudential Insurance Company. The insured died May 29, 1932, and thereafter on the fourth of October, 1932, the insurer filed a bill in chancery seeking to cancel the policy on the ground that the insured had knowingly misrepresented material facts relating to the condition of his health in the answers, contained in his application, to qu

227 Md. 393 (1962) 177 A.2d 417 SIMPSON v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA [No. 103, September Term, 1961.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 24, 1962. *395 The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and SYBERT, JJ. Ronald A. Willoner, with w

26 P.3d 510 (2001) 200 Ariz. 327 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth E. CRAIG, as personal representative of the Estate of William J. and Micah Craig, deceased; Kathleen Burr, as personal representative of the Estate of Diane Craig, et al., Defendants. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth E. Craig, as personal representative of the Estate of William J. and Mic

285 So.2d 689 (1973) PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Reginald RHODRIQUEZ, Appellee. No. 73-241. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 27, 1973. Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings, and Clifford B. Wentworth, Miami, for appellant. Gus Efthimiou, Jr., Miami, for appellee. <

145 F.2d 580 (1944) PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA v. MOORE et al. MOORE v. MOORE. No. 8578. Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. November 13, 1944. Rehearing Denied December 18, 1944. Writ of Certiorari Denied February 26, 1945. Euclid Louis Taylor, of Chicago, Ill. (Patrick B. Prescott, Jr., and A. M. Burroughs, both

456 S.E.2d 121 (1995) 118 N.C. App. 516 Douglas E. TART, Plaintiff, v. PRESCOTT'S PHARMACIES, INC., d/b/a The Medicine Shoppe; CKI Industries, Inc.; Natrol, Inc.; Elbert Carl Anderson, Jr., individually; Barbara W. Larkins, individually; and Ronald E. Anderson, individually, Defendants. No. 9410SC421. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 18, 1995.</

116 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) Dale BURNS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, et al., Defendants. No. 3:99CV7643. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. May 8, 2000. *918 Thomas A. Hargett, Maddox, Koeller, Hargett & Caruso, Indianapolis, IN, James R. Knepp, II, Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, Toled

STEPHENS, Associate Justice. "T concur in the result, but I dissent from that part of the opinion which purports to distinguish Patterson v. Ocean A. & G. Corporation, 25 App.D.C. 46. The majority rules in the instant case, and I think correctly, under Land*245ress v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 291 U.S. 491, 54 S.Ct. 461, 78 L.Ed. 934, 90 A.L.R. 1382, and Shanberg v. Fi

885 F.2d 820 BANKERS SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Judith S. KANE, f/k/a Judith S. Katz, as owner andbeneficiary of the life insurance policy of ArthurH. Kane, etc., Defendant-Appellee. (Two Cases)PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Judith S. KANE/KATZ, as owner and beneficiary of lifeinsurance policy of Arthur H. Kane, etc.,Defendant-Appellee.PRUDENTIAL IN

731 F.2d 1388 Keith L. PRESCOTT, Plaintiff-Respondent,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Petitioner.Keith L. PRESCOTT, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellee,v.UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants,andReynolds Electrical and Engineering Company, Inc., a NevadaCorporation, Defendant-Petitioner-Appellant. Nos. 83-1948, 83-1949. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth

FARRIS, Circuit Judge: The question certified for this interlocutory appeal is whether an agreement between the Atomic Energy Commission and the Nevada Industrial Commission is a valid device for providing workers’ compensation coverage for radiation-related injuries and diseases for the employees of Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company. The district court held that the agreement was not a valid device because it fa

On the 18th day of September, 1931, Jerry Prescott made application to the Prudential Insurance Company, incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey, for life insurance and made written answers to questions propounded in such application. The application appears to have been dated October 5th, 1931. On October 5th, 1931, a policy was issued, pursuant to that application. The policy was dated October 5, 1931, and was delivered on the 10th day of October, 1931. On May 29th, 19

131 Ariz. 78 (1981) 638 P.2d 1324 TOWN OF CHINO VALLEY, a municipal corporation; and Tom M. Sullivan, William J. Wells and Edwin J. Johnson, for and on behalf of themselves and other persons and legal entities constituting a class too numerous to be named as parties, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF PRESCOTT, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 15501. Supreme C

112 F.Supp.2d 483 (1999) Curtis Wayne TALIAFERRO, Plaintiff, v. ASSOCIATES CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, a Texas Corporation; Associates First Capital Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Associates First Capital Corporation, Short-Term Disability Plan; Associates Long-Term Disability Plan; Associates First Capital Corporation Pension Plan; Associates Financial Services Company, Inc.; and AETNA U.S. Healthcare, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Defendan

770 F.Supp.2d 1029 (2011) Lesley ARD, Steven Ard, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; Office of Thrift Supervision; United States of America, Defendant. Case No. CV 10-03767 MMM (AJWx). United States District Court, C.D. California. February 11, 2011. *1032 David N. Tarlow, Ervin, Cohen & Jessup, LLP, Beverl

959 A.2d 252 (2008) 403 N.J. Super. 443 GROW COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Dilip CHOKSHI and Pharmachem Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Respondents/Cross-Appellants. No. A-4282-06T2. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 24, 2008. Decided November 12, 2008.

Hallinan, J. On August 9, 1937, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (hereafter referred to as the “ Company ”) issued a policy of life insurance on the life of one Sophia Markowitz in the sum of $5,000, containing in substance the following beneficiary provisions: 1. The proceeds of the policy to be held by the Company and a guaranteed interest thereon paid to Mordecai Markowitz during his li

Hallinan, J. In an action predicated upon a policy of life insurance, the defendant insurance company counterclaimed rescission of the policy, based upon certain alleged misrepresentations as to the health of the insured. The motion is now made by the defendant, pursuant to section 96 of the Civil Practice Act, for an order severing the issues in the action and directing a separate and prior trial at Special