Cases

MORITZ, Circuit Judge. More than a decade after the crimes occurred, Dale Eaton was tried for and convicted of the kidnapping, sexual assault, robbery, and murder of Lisa Kimmell. A Wyoming jury sentenced him to death, and he later sought federal habeas relief from his convictions and death sentence. The federal district court agreed that Eaton was entitled to partial relief and vacated

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS YOLANDA PACHECO AND § FERNANDO PACHECO, No. 08-19-00129-CV § Appellants, Appeal from the 143rd

Filed 5/1/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D071024 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD265144) CHARLES WESLEY BRADY, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Defendant John William Pacheco (“Pacheco”) moves the court to suppress all evidence obtained from an interrogation following Pacheco’s arrest. Pacheco asserts he did not knowingly waive his rights because he did not receive a proper Miranda warning prior to making inculpatory statements.

*687Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.), rendered March 26, 2004, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s contention that the indictment should have been dismissed because his defense was improperly impaire

116 Cal.App.3d 617 (1981) 172 Cal. Rptr. 269 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN ROBERT PACHECO, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 20509. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. March 9, 1981. *620 COUNSEL Quin Denvir, State Public Defender, under appointment by the

OPINION PATRICK A. PIRTLE, Justice.. ■ In exchange for his pleas of guilty, Appellant, Juan Francisco Pacheco, was placed on five years deferred adjudication community supervision for possession of a controlled substance 1 and for assault on a family member.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § OSCAR RICARDO PACHECO, No. 08-07-00164-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS OSCAR RICARDO PACHECO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. § </

787 A.2d 1210 (2002) Charlene L. PACHECO v. Normand BEDFORD. No. 2000-230-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. January 10, 2002. *1211 Present WILLIAMS, C.J., LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. Norman Bedford, for defendant. Frank J. DiBiase, Cranston, Michael Ahn, Pawtucket, for plaintiff. </

850 P.2d 1028 (1993) 115 N.M.App. 325 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 13662. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 11, 1993. *1029 Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., Anthony Tupler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee. Don Klein, Jr., Socorro,

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge: Margaret Pacheco appeals the district court’s 1997 grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, New Life Bakery, Inc. (“New Life”), dismissing her claims of sexual harassment and hostile-work environment in violation of Title VII. Pacheco contends that the district court erred in concluding that there were no genuine issues of

43 Cal.3d 1041 (1987) 741 P.2d 1138 239 Cal. Rptr. 897 CHARLES ANTHONY PACHECO, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. Docket No. S.F. 25069. Supreme Court of California. September 24, 1987. *1045 COUNSEL Frank D. Winston for Petitioner. Herbert M. Ros

D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Rafael Pacheco-Navarette (“Pacheco”) and Victor Gomez-Vera (“Gomez”) appeal their convictions and sentences following each appellant’s guilty plea to being an alien in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2). Principally, appellants argue that their appeal waivers are invalid. We must also consider whether

Alfred H. Kleimax, J. Defendant Louis Pacheco was charged with the sale of dangerous drugs (Penal Law, § 220.35), a felony. Defendant Jose Collazo is charged with possession of dangerous drugs in the sixth degree (Penal Law, § 220.05), a misdemeanor. By stipulation of the Assistant District Attorney and both defense counsel, the cases were consolidated solely for the purpose of the hearings on the felony and misdemeanor complaint

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He was sentenced on a narcotics charge in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. See Pacheco v. United States, 367 F.2d 878. (10th Cir.), for an appeal from his conviction.

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Appellants, Adalberto Cervantes-Pacheco, Jerry Wayne Nelson and William E. Nelson, along with five other co-defendants, were charged in a two-count indictment with conspiracy to possess more than 1,000 pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 846, and conspiracy to import marijuana from Colombia into the United States. 21 U.S.C. §§ 963, 952(a), 960(a)(1). After a jur

*263 HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Tom Guerrero appeals the sentence imposed after he entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 846. Helen “Princey” Guerrero appeals the sentence she received after pleading guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 846; tw

610 F.2d 1296 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luis AGUIAR, Jorge Palenzuela and Julio Morejon-Pacheco,Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Virgen PALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Julio MOREJON-PACHECO and Luis Aguiar, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 78-5748, 79-1419 and 79-2084.

356 F.3d 1 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.William SOTO-BENÍQUEZ, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Juan Soto-Ramírez, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Eduardo Alicea-Torres, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Ramon Fernández-Malavé, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Carmelo