Cases

431 B.R. 739 (2010) In re GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS, INC., et al.,[1] Debtors. In re Onkyo America, Inc., Debtor. Global Technovations, Inc. and Kenneth Nathan, Liquidating Agent for Onkyo America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Onkyo U.S.A. Corporation, Onkyo Europe Electronics Gmbh, Onkyo Malaysia Sdn. Bdh., Onkyo Electric (Malaysia) Sdn. Bdh., and Onkyo Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 02-40447, 01-64771. Adve

KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge *153Plaintiff Uni-Systems, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Uni-Systems") commenced this action on January 11, 2017 against defendants United States Tennis Association, Inc., a not-for-profit incorporated in New York ("USTA"); Rossetti Inc., a Michigan Corporation, ("Rossetti"); Hunt Construction Group, Inc., a

INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC

*568OPINION By the Court, Cherry, C.J.: The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida has certified three questions to this court relating to the viability of equitable subrogation and the enforceability of contractual subordination against mechanic’s lien claimants under Nevada’s mechanic’s and materialman

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FORTIS ADVISORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as the Representative of the former shareholders of Unknown Worlds Entertainment, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 2025-0805-LWW KRAFTON, INC., Defendant. OPINION Date Submitted: January 9, 2026 Date Decided: March 16, 2026 Brian

*953OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: In this opinion, we address an important policy question concerning the proper scope of the record before this court and the extent to which this court may determine facts, if at all, when it considers a certified question from a federal court. The present matter arises in a pending certification

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Parsons Evergreene, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58634 ) Under Contract No. FA8903-04-D-8703 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas S. Oles, Esq. James F. Nagle, Esq.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO B, LLC, ) BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO C, LLC, ) BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO E, LLC, ) HUNOBY ENTERPRISES, LLC, and EARL ) P. GALLEHER, III, individually and ) derivatively on behalf of Basho Technologies, ) Inc., ) ) Plaintiff

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FORTIS ADVISORS LLC, solely in ) its capacity as representative of former ) stockholders of Auris Health, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0881-LWW ) JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, ) INC., ALEX GORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–1058 Filed June 10, 2016 BRENDA J. ALCALA, Appellee, vs. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and COURTYARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION d/b/a QUAD CITIES COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT, Appellants. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mark J. Smith, Judge. A personal injury plaintiff seeks further review of c

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

MEMORANDUM OPINION Sue L. Robinson, Senior District Judge 1. INTRODUCTION On September 4, 2013, plaintiff SRI International, Inc. (“SRI”) filed suit against defendant Cisco Systems Inc. (“Cisco”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,711,615 (“the ’615 patent”) and 6,484,203 (“the ’203 patent”) (collectively, “the patents”). (D.I. 1) On December 18, 2013, Cisco answered the complaint

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-1061L Filed: August 27, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * FISHERMEN’S FINEST, INC., et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * UNITED STATES,

I. Background A. Factual Background The following facts appear to be undisputed. 1. The Parties SiOnyx, LLC was founded in 2006 by Eric Mazur, a physics professor at Harvard University, and James Carey, his former doctoral student. (ECF 337-40 at 7:5-6, 8:3-9:7). Their goal was to commercialize laser-textured black silicon photodet

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on (1) Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [78], (2) Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Michael B. Mazis, Ph.D. [76], (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Damages [70], (4) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Robert A. Hutchins, CPA, as to a Reasonable Roy

*973MEMORANDUM OPINION TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. BACKGROUND The ready-to-cook chicken that you buy at your local grocery store is called a *974broiler chicken. Demand for broiler chicken has remained relatively constant, rising slightly but st

American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act; Section 1603; Internal Revenue Code §§ 45, 48; Fuel Cell Power Plant; Gas Conditioning Equipment; Trash Facility; Municipal Solid Waste. OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiffs RP1 Fuel Cell, LLC (RP1), and UTS SJ-1, LLC (SJ-1) have brought suit against the United States alleging they are entitled to “