⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Pack v. Thompson”

JONES v. PACKpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017-12-04 · Published · cited 2× · 408 P.3d 628; 2018 OK CIV APP 3
JANE P. WISEMAN, JUDGE: ¶1 We address Jody Robert Pack’s appeal of a trial court order awarding attorney fees to Lacee Dawn Jones to determine whether the trial court erred in making the award. After review, we conclude the trial court erred in making the award and reverse its order. BACKGROUND
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011-07-29 · Published · cited 7× · 358 S.W.3d 481; 2011 Ky. App. LEXIS 187; 2011 WL 3207947
OPINION THOMPSON, Judge: Ed Martin appeals the Rowan Circuit Court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Pack’s Inc. We affirm. On August 4, 2004, Pack’s Inc. and Southeastern Construction, Inc. entered into a contract for the construction of a gas station at the Kroger grocery store in Morehead, Kentucky. Pack’s, a commercial and residential construction company, was o
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-09-17 · Published · cited 3× · 2025 Ohio 4359
[Cite as State v. Thompson, 2025-Ohio-4359.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-240446 TRIAL NO. B-2203847 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : ANTHONY THOMPSON, :
Pack v. Thompsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 223 F. 642; 139 C.C.A. 188; 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1775
MORROW, Circuit Judge. In this suit the plaintiff prayed for and obtained an injunction pendente lite, restraining and enjoining. *643the defendants from in any manner taking any steps towards forfeiting the plaintiffs right, title, and interest in and to 12 certain placer mining claims, particularly set forth and described in the complaint as claims Nos. 68 to 72, inclus
Pack v. Thompsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915-05-24 · Published · cited 3× · 223 F. 641; 139 C.C.A. 187; 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1774
MORROW, Circuit Judge. In the present suit the plaintiff prayed for and obtained an injunction pendente lite restraining and enjoining the defendants from in any manner taking any steps towards forfeiting the plaintiffs right, title, and interest in and to 12 certain placer mining claims, particularly set forth and described in the complaint as claims Nos. 68 to 72, inclusive, 87 to 91, inclusive, 111,, and 112, situate upon Sea
Pack v. Thompsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915-05-24 · Published · cited 5× · 223 F. 635; 139 C.C.A. 181; 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1772
MORROW, Circuit Judge (after stating the'facts as above). Section 2324 of the Revised Statutes of the United States provides, among other things, that: “On each claim located after the tenth day of May, eighteen hundred and seventy-two, and until a patent has been issued therefor, not less than one hundred dollars’ worth of labor shall be performed or improvements made during each. year. * * * Upon the
Pack v. Thompsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915-05-24 · Published · cited 2× · 223 F. 645; 139 C.C.A. 191; 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1777
MORROW, Circuit Judge. In the present suit the plaintiff prayed for and obtained an injunction pendente lite restraining and enjoining the defendants from in any manner taking any steps towards forfeiting the plaintiff’s right, title, and interest in and to 44 certain placer mining claims, particularly set forth and described in the complaint as claims Nos. 1 to 31, inclusive, 48 to 50, inclusive, 67, 70, 73, 86, 92, 93, 113, 11
Pack v. Thompsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915-05-24 · Published · cited 0× · 223 F. 643; 139 C.C.A. 189; 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1776
MORROW, Circuit Judge. In this suit the plaintiff prayed for and obtained an injunction pendente lite restraining and enjoining the de>fendants from in any manner taking any steps towards forfeiting the plaintiff’s right, title, and interest in and to 44 certain placer mining claims, particularly set forth and described in the complaint as claims Nos. 1 to 31, inclusive, 48 to 50, inclusive, 67, 70, 73, 86, 92, 113, 114, 130,
JONES v. PACKpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017-12-04 · Published · cited 1× · 2018 OK CIV APP 3; 408 P.3d 628
JONES v. PACK Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us e-p
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994-02-22 · Published · cited 21× · 869 P.2d 323; 128 Oil & Gas Rep. 550; 65 O.B.A.J. 803; 1994 OK 23; 1994 Okla. LEXIS 28
869 P.2d 323 (1994) Mary Lou PACK, Ann E. Watts, Robert E. Stevens and Jo E. Stevens, Husband and Wife, Appellees, v. SANTA FE MINERALS, A DIVISION OF SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Southland Royalty Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Deck Oil Company, an Oklahoma corporation, Appellants, John V. BALZER, an individual, Jake F. Balzer and Lydia Balzer, Husband and Wife, Appellees, v. SANTA FE MINERALS, A DIVISION OF SANTA FE INT
Thompson v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2024-10-15 · Published · cited 0× · 907 S.E.2d 610; 320 Ga. 52
320 Ga. 52 FINAL COPY S24A0636. THOMPSON v. THE STATE. BOGGS, Chief Justice. Appellant Willie Felix Thompson challenges his convictions for malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Felicia Sullivan. Appellant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions and that the trial court plainly erred by giving separate, conflicting jury instructions on prior-bad-acts evidence and prior-difficulties evidence.
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 3206
[Cite as State v. Thompson, 2024-Ohio-3206.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT NOBLE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYLER THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008-09-09 · Published · cited 40× · 54 A.D.3d 727; 864 N.Y.S.2d 447
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., (1) the defendant Joseph Sykes appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rosenberg, J.), dated July 27, 2007, as denied *728that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and (2) the defendants Diana Weav
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ohio 3602
[Cite as State v. Thompson, 2022-Ohio-3602.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT CRAWFORD COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 3-22-06 v. PATRICK A. THOMPSON, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Crawford County Common Pleas Court Trial C
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968-11-22 · Published · cited 0× · 60 Tenn. App. 92; 444 S.W.2d 180; 1968 Tenn. App. LEXIS 282
BEJACH, J. This cause involves an appeal in error by Thompson Brothers Investment Company from a judgment or decree of the Circuit Court of Shelby County in a condemnation suit which awarded to plaintiff in error $30,289.30 for property taken but no incidental damages for property not taken, and required plaintiff in error to refund $3,135.70, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent annum from December 13, 1966. In this opinion, t
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 3, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. KENON PACK and JENNIFER BANKS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 11-04834 Chris Craft, Judge No. W2014-00518-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 26, 2015 The Defendants, Kenon Pack and Jennifer Banks, were both indicted by the Shelby County Grand Jury f
Thompson v. Kemppublic domain
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 309 F. Supp. 3d 1360
MARTIN, Circuit Judge Nine Georgia voters ("plaintiffs") bring this action challenging Georgia's 2015 redistricting plan as violating the Constitution as well as Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 52 U.S.C. § 10301. First Am. Compl. ("Compl."), Doc. 84 ¶¶ 1, 21-30. The plaintiffs1 ch
Pack v. Yusuffpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-07-10 · Published · cited 654× · 218 F.3d 448; 2000 WL 942919
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-appellant James David Pack (Pack), a federal prisoner currently incarcerated in Mississippi, was convicted in 1989 in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Based on his prior state convictions for, among other things, burglary and gra
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-04-23 · Published · cited 6× · 122 N.E.3d 958
Najam, Judge. *960 Statement of the Case [1] Kevin Pack appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment for the Truth Publishing Company and John S. Dille III, the owners of The Elkhart Truth newspaper (collectively, "the News
Thompson v. Asimospublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2016-12-15 · Published · cited 285× · 6 Cal. App. 5th 970; 212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 158; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1101
Opinion STREETER, J. Jason Everett Thompson founded a consulting firm and operated it as a sole proprietorship doing business as Wired Real Estate Group (WREG) with the aim of advising clients in a niche Internet infrastructure industry called “colocation,” sometimes, but not always, performing services that required WREG to have a real estate broker’s license