Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2355 TAMARA S. FRAZIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2355 TAMARA S. FRAZIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Plaintiff David Elias (“Plaintiff’ or “Elias”) brings this putative class action against Hewlett-Packard Co. and Does 1 through 50 (“Defendants” or “HP”) alleging: (1) violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), California Civil Code §§ 1750, et seq.; (2) violation of California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”), California B

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART, DENYING-IN-PART MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Hewlett-Packard Co. (“Defendant” or “HP”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff David Elias’s Second Amended Complaint based on Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b). The Court found the motion to be appropriate for disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l

744 F.Supp.2d 494 (2010) Clyde L. BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:08cv498. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. September 30, 2010. *500 John Barry Donohue, Jr., Law Office of John Barry Donohue Jr., James Broome Thorsen, Marchant Th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YORK COUNTY ON BEHALF OF No. 22-15501 THE COUNTY OF YORK RETIREMENT FUND; MARYLAND D.C. No. ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY 4:20-cv-07835- PENSION FUND, Individually and on JSW Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HP, INC.; DION J. WEISLER; CATHERINE A. L

656 F.3d 925 (2011) Jonathan ALVAREZ; Emanuel Jiminez; Shaun McCracken; Housam Moumne; Mohammad Moumne; Kent Cochran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHEVRON CORPORATION; Chevron USA, Inc.; Exxon Mobil Corporation; Conocophillips Company; BP Corporation North America, Inc.; BP Products North America, Inc.; BP West Coast Products, LLC; BP North American Petroleum, Inc.; Shell Oil Company; Shell

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DEBRA M. BROWN, District Judge. This action arises from debt collection efforts by Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. (“Chase”) to recover full payment on a credit card account held by Plaintiff David Wallace and his ex-wife. Plaintiff maintains that he is not liable for the entire balance because it includes a charge from a convenience check his ex-wife drafted on the acc

533 F.Supp.2d 479 (2008) Steven G. MILLETT and Melody J. Millett, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TRUELINK INC., a Trans Union Company, Defendant. Civ. No. 05-599-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 7, 2008. *480 *481 Christopher J

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE UNBOUND PARTNERS LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-09-302 ) PRW CCLD ) INVOY HOLDINGS INC.,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE UNBOUND PARTNERS LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-09-302 ) PRW CCLD ) INVOY HOLDINGS INC.,

763 F.Supp.2d 759 (2011) John CHUBIRKO, Plaintiff, v. BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF SOUTHERN PIEDMONT, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 3:09-cv-502-FDW-DLH. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. February 10, 2011. *760 John Chubirko, Kannapolis, NC, pro se. *761

ORDER 1) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS (Dkt. 87) 2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT CHIN YANG (Dkt. 103) 3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT BRIAN CLARK (Dkt. 104) DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge. Before the Court are three motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 87); (2) Defen

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (filing 12), motion to strike affirmative defenses (filing 61), and motion to dismiss counterclaims (filing 63). The Court will deny each of the plaintiffs’ motions. I. BACKGROUND The plaintiffs and the defendants are all, genera

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. This action arises out of a criminal intrusion into a computer network system used to provide online gaming and Internet connectivity via an individual’s gaming console or personal computer. Plaintiffs, a nationwide putative consumer clas