Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Pamela J. Moore”
Pamela I. Montgomery v. William Moore Agency Incpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAMELA I. MONTGOMERY, Individually and as Adrninistrator of the Estate of THOMAS J. MONTGOMERY, THOMAS K. MONTGOMERY, JEREMY MONTGOMERY, and HARRY I. MONTGOMERY, Plaintiffs__,, C.A. No. N11C-11-047 AML V¢ WILLIAM MOORE AGENCY, INC., LYNN M. HITCHENS, and MID-STATE INSURANCE, INC., \/\/\/\/\y\J\/\J§/\_/§/\./\/\J\J\J§/ Defendants. Date Submitted: March 7, 2016 Date Decided: March 31, 2016 MEMORANDUM OPINION Upon Defendants’ M0ti0n for Summar
Pamela I. Montgomery v. William Moore Agency, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAMELA I. MONTGOMERY, ) Individually and as Administrator ) of the Estate of ) THOMAS J. MONTGOMERY, ) THOMAS K. MONTGOMERY, ) JEREMY MONTGOMERY, and ) HARRY I. MONTGOMERY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. N11C-11-047 AML
Moore v. Mueller Copper Tube Co.public domain
LEE, P.J., for the Court. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS ¶ 1. On September 7, 2001, Pamela Moore was working at Mueller Copper Tire Company, Inc. (Mueller). Moore had worked at Mueller for approximately eighteen years and, on this particular day, was working as an ACR helper. As an ACR helper, Moore was responsible for running copper tubing into a printer for labeling. On the day in questio
Moore v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
State v. Moorepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Moore v. Statepublic domain
EMAS, J. Clarence Moore appeals from a summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal, Moore asserts that the record establishes that trial counsel failed to object to improper comments made by the State during closing argument, and further asserts that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing.
Moore v. Statepublic domain
BILBREY, J. Barry Layne Moore appeals his judgment and sentence, entered after the jury returned a guilty verdict at trial, in Count I for possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell in violation of section 893.13(l)(a), Florida Statutes, and in Count II for selling or dispensing a prescription drug without being furnished a prescription, in violation of section 465.015(2)(c), Florida Statutes. Because the portion
Moore v. Statepublic domain
ON REMAND ROTHENBERG, J. Upon remand by the Florida Supreme Court, we reverse Baron Moore’s conviction and sentence for second degree murder and remand for a new trial. In State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010), the Florida Supreme Court found that the standard jury instruction for manslaughter
Moore v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Ronald G. Moore appeals the circuit court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. The petition addressed Moore’s public records demand to the State Attorney for copies of various documents related to his 2003 convictions on three counts of capital sexual battery. The State concedes that Moore was entitled to receive a response to his public record demand. Accordingly, we reverse the circuit court’s o
Moore v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in Case No. 11-000237-CFMA, in the Circuit Court in and for St. Johns County, Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). PETITION GRANTED. PALMER, EVANDER, COHEN, JJ., concur.
Moore v. Statepublic domain
GRIFFIN, J. Petitioner, Jermaine Terae Moore [“Moore”], petitions this Court for the issuance of a writ of certiorari after the circuit court denied his motion for an order to depose Child Protection Team [“CPT”] members, Lindsey Matthews and Victor Figueroa, two Category “A” State of Florida witnesses. Instead, the circuit court authorized the alternative of written interrogatories with a hearing to be scheduled on the motion
Moore v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal from an order denying Thomas James *721Moore’s second successive motion to vacate his judgment of conviction for first-degree murder and sentence of death, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Because the order concerns postconviction relief from a capital conviction for which a sentence of dea
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: In 1965, Plaintiffs sued Tangipahoa Parish School Board, seeking desegregation of the school district. Since then, numerous remedial injunctions have been issued in pursuit of the ultimate goal: full unitary status and dismissal of the case. In 2008, the district court granted the parties’ joint motion to create the position of Chief Desegrega
Moore v. Statepublic domain
KHOUZAM, Judge. Robert Moore appeals his convictions and sentences on five counts of solicitation of a child over the internet and four counts of transmission of material harmful to minors (sender and recipient in state). We affirm. We also remand for the circuit court to amend Moore’s order of probation to correct a scrivener’s error because the circuit court granted Moore’s motion to correct scrivener’s error without amend
Moore v. Statepublic domain
57 So.3d 240 (2011) Baron MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D09-958. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 9, 2011. *241 Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Timothy R.M. Thomas,
PER CURIAM: The district court entered an initial injunction against Tangipahoa Parish School Board in 1967 soon after this desegregation suit was filed. In 2008, the district court granted the parties’ joint motion to create the position of Chief Desegregation Implementation Officer (“CDIO”) to spearhead the Board’s implementation of the court’s remedial orders.
GOLDEN, Justice (Ret.). [¶1] Plaintiffs, several residents in the Milatzo Subdivision in Cheyenne, Wyoming, filed a complaint against Defendants Jennifer Moore, d/b/a Silly Bear Daycare, and Willie Moore, III, seeking to permanently enjoin Defendants from operating a daycare business out of their residence in the Milatzo Subdivision. The district court found that Defendants' dayca
Pamela Moore Hawkins v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NO. 12-24-00018-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PAMELA MOORE HAWKINS, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
People v. Moorepublic domain
176 Cal.App.4th 687 (2009) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KYRON J. MOORE, Defendant and Appellant. No. B207616. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight. August 11, 2009. *690 Lise M. Breakey, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attor
Moore v. Department of Revenuepublic domain
PER CURIAM. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR Based on Appellee’s confession of error, this matter is summarily reversed pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(b) and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED. ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.