Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Canon Inc.”
In Re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATIONpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. In this Multi District Litigation (“MDL”), 1 Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. (“Papst”) has alleged that digital camera manufacturers that sell prod
Taranto, Circuit Judge. *1246 Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG owns U.S. Patent No. 9,189,437 . Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electro
In Re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATIONpublic domain
OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONIN-FRINGEMENT REGARDING DEVICES IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 15 ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, sues multiple manufacturers of digital cameras for alleged infringement of two pat
In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg Litigationpublic domain
*59 OPINION RE: FINAL JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT IN FIRST WAVE CASES AND RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Papst Licensing GmbH & Co: KG, a German company, brought suit against multiple manu
In Re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATIONpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE “DATA TRANSMIT/RECEIVE DEVICE” CLAIM LIMITATION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, sues multiple manufacturers of digital ca
In Re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATIONpublic domain
*24 OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONIN-FRINGEMENT BASED ON THE LIMITATION OF AN “INPUT/OUTPUT [STORAGE] DEVICE CUSTOMARY IN A HOST DEVICE” ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Papst Licensing GmbH &am;
In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg Litigationpublic domain
OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON “SECOND CONNECTING DEVICE” ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, sues multiple manufacturers of digital cameras for alleged infringement of two patents owned by P
In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg Litigationpublic domain
*50 OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONIN-FRINGEMENT OF THE 449 PATENT (“SIMULATING A VIRTUAL FILE SYSTEM”) ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Papst Licensing GmbH
Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KGpublic domain
767 F.Supp.2d 1 (2011) In re PAPST LICENSING GmbH & CO. KG LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, 08-865 (D.D.C.). Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC). MDL Docket No. 1880. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 2, 2011. *2 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON HP
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Samsung Techwin Co.public domain
762 F.Supp.2d 56 (2011) In re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Samsung Techwin Co., et al., Civ. No. 07-2088 (D.D.C.). Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC). MDL Docket No. 1880. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 1, 2011. *57
In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg Litigationpublic domain
590 F.Supp.2d 94 (2008) In re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Papst v. Konica-Minolta Photo Imaging, Inc., 08-cv-1433 (D.D.C.). Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC). MDL No. 1880. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 11, 2008. *97 Robert F. Muse, Stein Mitchell &
Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.public domain
791 F.Supp.2d 175 (2011) In re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, 08-865 (D.D.C.). Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC). MDL No. 1880. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 15, 2011. *176 Steven John Routh, Sten A. Jensen, Orric
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RDM) KG PATENT LITIGATION MDL No. 1880 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Camera Manufacturers’ Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions as to the “new patents” (U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,966,144 and 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING MEMORY CARDS ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, sues multiple manufac *16 turers of digital cameras for alleged infringem
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) IN RE PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG ) LITIGATION ) ) Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC) This document relates to ) ) MDL No. 1880 Hewlett
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATION Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC) MDL Docket No. 1880 This Document Relates To: Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, 08-865 (D.D.C.) MEMORANDUM OPINION ON HP’S MOTION TO ST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATION Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC) MDL Docket No. 1880 This Document Relates To: Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, 08-865 (D.D.C.) MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PAPST’S MOTION FOR PARTIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATION Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC) MDL Docket No. 1880 This Document Relates To: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Samsung Techwin Co., et al., Civ. No. 07-2088 (D.D.C.) MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PAPST’S
Hewlett-Packard v. Papstpublic domain
*64MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: HEWLETT-PACKARD’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, sues multiple manufacturers of digital cameras for alleged infringement of two patents owned by Papst: U.S. Patent Number 6,470,399 (399 Patent) and U.S. Patent Number 6,895,44
Papst v. Konica-Minolta Photo Imaging, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Koniea Minolta Photo Imaging, Inc. (“KMPI”) brought suit in this district against Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG (“Papst”) seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement, invalidity, and unen-forceability of two patents owned by Papst. Papst moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction because it is a German licensing company that d