Cases

543 U.S. 1169 PARDUEv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-7920. Supreme Court of United States. February 22, 2005. 1 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 385 F. 3d 101.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

66 F.3d 333 David Preston Parduev.U.S. NO. 95-2542 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. June 29, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Ark., No. 94-5109 1 AFFIRMED.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

270 F.Supp.2d 61 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Corey PARDUE, Defendant No. CR. 03-06-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 2, 2003. *63 Darcie N. Mcelwee, U.S. Attorneys Office, Portland, ME, for USA, Plaintiff. Robert C. Andrews, Portland, ME, for Corey Pardue (1), Defendants. MEMORANDUM O

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Corey Pardue (“Pardue”) appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and a motion in limine related to his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). For the reasons stated below, we affirm. I. Pardue entered a conditional guilty plea to a one-count indic

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-1940 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

RILEY, Circuit Judge. David Pardue (Pardue) was sentenced to 105 months imprisonment and three years supervised release for using the mail with the intent that a murder be committed. While Pardue was serving his supervised release, his probation officer filed a petition to revoke supervised release alleging Pardue had committed new state-law crimes of aggravated robbery and aggr

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.*1262Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-4088 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. *

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. On December 20, 1996, a jury found Jerry Pardue guilty of embezzlement and misapplication of bank funds. He was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment and ordered to pay $10,000 restitution. The only thing at all remarkable in the case is that the events occurred in 1986 and the indictment was returned almost 10 years later, just before the expirat

PER CURIAM. The facts in this case are fully set forth in our companion opinion filed this date involving Michel and Jack Pardue. See United States v. Jack Pardue; Michel Pardue, Nos. 91-2307/2388, 983 F.2d 835. David Pardue appealed his conviction for (1) conspiracy to use interstate commerce facilities in connection with murder for hire under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1988), engaging in or aiding and abetting inte

765 F.Supp. 513 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David PARDUE, Jack Pardue, Michel Pardue, Defendants. Cr. Nos. 90-50012-01, 90-50012-02 and 90-50012-03. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. May 13, 1991. *514 J. Michael Fitzhugh, William Cromwell U.S. Atty., Fort Smith, Ark., for U.S.

PER CURIAM: In this sentencing guidelines appeal, Defendant-Appellant Donald Pardue complains of the district court’s denial of his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2). He asserts that the district court abused its discretion in denying his modification motion that was based on a post-sentencing amen

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. David Preston Pardue appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court for the Western District of Arkansas in his unsuccessful action to set aside a default judgment against him in a civil judicial forfeiture proceeding. For reversal, Pardue argues the district court erred in (1) concluding that he received adequate notice of the forfeitu