Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Parker H. Davis”
Stancliff v. H. B. Davis Co.public domain
208 Md. 191 (1955) 117 A.2d 577 STANCLIFF v. H.B. DAVIS COMPANY ET AL. [No. 11, October Term, 1955.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided November 7, 1955. Motion for rehearing filed November 21, 1955. Denied November 30, 1955. *193 The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J.
Parker v. John Moriarty & Associatespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge On September 16, 2015, Plaintiffs Johnnie Parker and Starrelette Gail Jones-Parker brought this action against Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff John Moriarty & Associates of Virginia LLC (“JMAV”). Plaintiffs alleged that JMAV, as general contractor of a construction proj
Parker v. John Moriarty & Associatespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge On September 16, 2015, Plaintiffs Johnnie Parker and Starrelette Gail Jones-Parker brought this action against Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff John Moriarty & Associates of Virginia LLC (“JMAV”). Plaintiffs alleged that JMAV, as general contractor of a construction project
Parker v. John Moriarty & Associatespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Johnnie Parker and Starre-lette Gail Jones-Parker bring this action against Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff John Moriarty & Associates of Virginia LLC (“JMAV”). Plaintiffs allege that JMAV, as general contractor of a construction project, was negligent resulting in seriou
Parker v. John Moriarty & Associatespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Johnnie Parker and Starre-lette Gail Jones-Parker bring this action against Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff John Moriarty & Associates of Virginia LLC (“JMAV”). Plaintiffs allege that JMAV, as general contractor of a construction project, was negligent re
Parker v. John Moriarty & Associatespublic domain
*2 MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge On December 2, 2016, the Court issued an [62] Order and accompanying [63] Memorandum Opinion denying both the [46] Motion to Intervene and the [61] Motion to Retain Right of Party to
Davis v. Davispublic domain
631 S.E.2d 114 (2006) 360 N.C. 518 Debra M. DAVIS v. John Bernard DAVIS. No. 571PA04. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 30, 2006. Vannoy, Colvard, Triplett & Vannoy, P.L.L.C., by H.C. Colvard, Jr. and Daniel S. Johnson, North Wilkesboro, for plaintiff-appellee. Theodore M. Molitoris, Winston-Salem and Michelle D. Reingold, Clem
Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman v. Tony Parkerpublic domain
Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J. This appeal represents the third time, each after a trial on the merits, that we have addressed the facial constitutionality of Tennessee's lethal injection protocol. In both prior appeals, we upheld the particular protocol at issue. In this most recent litigation, the death-sentenced inmates challenge Tennessee's current three-drug protocol, which calls for th
American Academy of Implant Dentistry v. Parkerpublic domain
Case: 16-50157 Document: 00514039074 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 19, 2017 No. 16-50157
Parker v. Milliganpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., and Gary P. Simmons appeal the district court’s order dismissing this civil action for lack of standing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v. Milligan, Nos. CA-03-81-4-H; CA-03-454-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con
Luke v. Parkerpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * David Luke, Texas prisoner #797148, moves for the appointment of counsel in his appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his civil rights suit. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite to the exercise of j
STEELMAN, Judge. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of Allen Toby Hedgepeth (Hedgepeth) for class certification. I.Factual and Procedural Background The facts and procedural background of this case are set forth in the companion case of Hedgepeth v. Parker’s Landing (COA 13-914).
Vitto v. Davispublic domain
23 So.3d 1048 (2009) Weldon VITTO, Sr. v. Donald Ray DAVIS, et al. Nos. 09-498. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 4, 2009. *1049 Kenneth W. DeJean, Attorney at Law, Lafayette, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellant: Weldon Vitto, Sr. William H. Parker, III, Allen & Gooch, Lafayette, Louisiana, for Defen
Parker v. McCawpublic domain
24 Cal.Rptr.3d 55 (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1494 Gregory PARKER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Wendy P. McCAW, et al., Defendants and Appellants. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six. January 27, 2005. *56 Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Carter G. Phillips, Theodore N. Miller, James M. Harris, Anne Mayer Turk; Hollis
Parker v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.public domain
JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs sued various local government defendants (“Defendants”), claiming unjust enrichment and seeking disgorgement of traffic fines Plaintiffs allege were imposed in violation of Florida law. Defendants moved to dismiss the claim, asserting sovereign immunity. The district court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and Defendants now appeal. After a careful review of
Davis v. Cintas Corporationpublic domain
OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Tanesha Davis sued Cintas Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of female job applicants denied employment as entry-level sales representatives. She alleged that Cintas’s hiring practices led to gender discrimination, in violation of Title VII, and caused Cintas to reject her application for employment twice. Th
Davis v. Statepublic domain
Demarlos Mentrel Davis was convicted of attempted first-degree rape and was sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment. Davis's conviction occurred at his third trial; his two earlier trials had resulted in mistrials. In an unpublished memorandum, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Davis's conviction and sentence. Davis v. State (No. CR-06-1997, Oct. 24, 2008), 33 So.3d 649 (Ala.Crim.App. 2008) (table). We granted Davis's petition for a writ of
Ex Parte Parkerpublic domain
*712OPINION GRAY, Justice. Chad Parker is charged with an aggravated sexual assault of a child under fourteen years of age. His pretrial bail was set at $75,000. Parker filed a writ of habeas corpus to reduce his bail. The trial court reduced his bail to $50,000. After securing findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court, Parker appea
PARKER, Justice. All causes of action involved in these consolidated appeals arise from the same factual scenario. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (“Aflac”) and Marilyn Phillips Hunter appeal from a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court denying their motions to compel arbitration. We reverse and remand. Facts and Procedural History According to the affidav
Davis v. Alabama Education Ass'npublic domain
MURDOCK, Justice. The State Director of Finance, Marquita Davis (“the finance director”),1 and the State Comptroller, Thomas L. White, Jr. (“the comptroller”),2 appeal from a prelim*739inary injunction entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in response to a declaratory-judgment action brought by the Alabama Ed