Cases

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Justice. | Appellants Grand Valley Ridge, LLC (Grand Valley) and Thomas A. Terminella (Terminella), a member of Grand Valley, appeal an order of the Washington County Circuit Court granting a motion to dismiss and a motion for sanctions filed by appel-lees Metropolitan National Bank; Rogers Bancshares, Inc.; Doyle Rogers Company; Doyle Rogers, Sr.; Josephine Raye Rogers

Opinion VOGEL (C. S.), P. J. Introduction This is an action upon a guaranty. The guarantor moved for summary judgment on the basis that the secured creditor’s failure to give him postdefault notice of the sale of the collateral barred its claim for a deficiency judgment. Based upon statutory and decisional law, the trial court found that the guarantor’s predefault waiver of the requireme

26 Kan. App.2d 631 (1999) 994 P.2d 1079 BROOK HUGHS, Appellee, v. VALLEY STATE BANK, TIM KOHART, and KEVIN WHITE, Appellants. No. 80,840. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed December 10, 1999. Deanne Watts Hay and Stanley R. Parker, of Parker & Hay, L.L.P., of Topeka, for appellants. Brian C. Wright and <

Itzkowitz v Valley Natl. Bank Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 08171) Itzkowitz v Valley Natl. Bank Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 08171 Decided on February 24, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Re

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1830 Filed July 23, 2025 JULIAN TONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. ARTHUR PARKER, HAZEL PARKER, and the ARTHUR E. PARKER AND HAZEL FRANCES PARKER TRUST DATED 5/26/1993, Defendants-Appellees, ________________________________ ARTHUR PARKER, HAZEL PARKER, and the ARTHUR E. PARKER AND HAZEL FRANCES PARKER TRUST DATED 5/26/1993, Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CALVIN LAMONT PARKER, Defendant and Appellant. S113962 San Diego County Superior Court SCD154640 May 19, 2022 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye an

OSCN Found Document:PURCELL v. PARKER PURCELL v. PARKER2020 OK 83Case Number: 118328Decided: 10/06/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 83, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORE2023 OK 90Case Number: 119810Decided: 09/19/2023OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM, LLC, Cite as: 2023 OK 90, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CLAY E

108 Mich. App. 133 (1981) 310 N.W.2d 301 VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA v. KLINE. Docket No. 50974. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided July 28, 1981. John R. Brennan and David L. Park, for plaintiffs. Parker & Parker, for defendants. Before: M.J. KELLY, P.J., and BRONSON and R.M. DANIELS,[*]

Filed 3/16/21; Certified for Publication 4/14/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ANTELOPE VALLEY GROUNDWATER CASES* F082492 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 40 et al., (JCCP No. 4408) Cross-complainants and Respondents, v.

OSCN Found Document:OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

Filed 3/16/21; Certified for Publication 4/6/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT F082469 ANTELOPE VALLEY GROUNDWATER CASES* REBECCA LEE WILLIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, (JCCP No. 4408) v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY WATERWORKS

Opinion HUFFMAN, J. Stephen C. Parker, as administrator of the estate of Irma E. Young, deceased (the Estate), filed this petition under Probate Code section 850, subdivision (a),1 to request an order and judgment establishing the Estate’s ownership of certain real property and personal property held by and associated with a number of land trusts and business trusts created during th

Opinion by JUDGE ROTHENBERG * T1 At issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Todd Creek Village Metropolitan District (the special district), had the constitutional and statutory authority to enter into loans and security agreements with the defendant, Valley Bank & Trust Company (the bank), and to pledge the district's assets as collateral. Because we conclude the spec

NUMBER 13-23-00303-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG VIJAY SOOKDIAL, Appellant, v. VALLEY LAND TITLE COMPANY, LTD, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 139TH DISTRICT COURT O

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Parker, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-3848.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical o

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE This action arises out of Plaintiff Tracy Parker's claims of sex and disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"), the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101,

05/26/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 15, 2020 Session GARDENIA PARKER, ET AL. v. EPSTEIN ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003285-11, CT-003286-11 Jerry Stokes, Judge ________________________

518 P.2d 7 (1974) William S. EDMONDS, Executor of the Estate of John N. Igo, Deceased, Appellant (Defendant below), v. The VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA, a National banking association, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 4258. Supreme Court of Wyoming. January 4, 1974. William S. Edmonds, pro se. E.J. Herschler, Kemmerer, for appellee. Before PARKER, C.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THESE MATTERS are before the Court on the above-named defendants’ motions to dismiss the Indictments in their respective cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [CR-15 Docs. 77, 80; CR-16 Docs. 77, 78, 86, 99, 100, and 103].1 Further, the defendants have filed motions to dismiss the Indictments due t