Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Pasquale v. Law Offices of Nelson & Kennard”

Pasquale v. Law Offices of Nelson & Kennardpublic domain

District Court, N.D. California · 2013-04-15 · Published · cited 3× · 940 F. Supp. 2d 1151; 2013 WL 1618020; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53650

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dana Pasquale brings this action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq. and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”), Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1788 et seq., alleging that tele

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.public domain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 2× · 2019 NY Slip Op 3883

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Michael Davis v. Hollins Lawpublic domain

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-08-08 · Published · cited 12× · 832 F.3d 962; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14517; 2016 WL 4174747

OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Hollins Law, a law firm and debt collection agency, is subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which among other things requires debt collectors “to disclose in subsequent communications that the communication is from a debt collector.” 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(ll). Today we hold that if a subsequent communicatio

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Forkum v. Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.public domain

District Court, N.D. California · 2014-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 44 F. Supp. 3d 959; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70693; 2014 WL 2119922

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge Plaintiff James Forkum (“Plaintiff’) brings the instant action against Defen*961dant Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and California’s Ro

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Kagan v. Selene Finance L.P.public domain

District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-09-28 · Published · cited 2× · 210 F. Supp. 3d 535; 2016 WL 5660255; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482

OPINION & ORDER Kenneth M. Karas, District Judge Helen Sue Kagan (“Plaintiff’) brings this Action, on behalf of herself and a class, alleging that Selene Finance L.P. (“Selene Finance”) and Selene Ventures GP, LLC (“Selene Ventures,” and collectively, “Defendants”) engaged in unlawful credit and collection practices in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. <

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

People v. Mitchampublic domain

California Supreme Court · 1992-02-24 · Published · cited 284× · 824 P.2d 1277; 1 Cal. 4th 1027; 5 Cal. Rptr. 2d 230; 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1532; 92 Daily Journal DAR 3034; 1992 Cal. LEXIS 1269

1 Cal.4th 1027 (1992) 824 P.2d 1277 5 Cal. Rptr.2d 230 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STEPHAN LOUIS MITCHAM, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S004636. Crim. No. 23833. Supreme Court of California. February 24, 1992. *1037 COUNSEL Paul L. Hoffman, under appointmen

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →