⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Patricia June Sheldon”

Smith v. Sheldonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-08-08 · Published · cited 1× · 2018 Ohio 3233
[Cite as Smith v. Sheldon, 2018-Ohio-3233.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: EDDIE LEE SMITH : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Petitioner-Relator :
Tulley v. Sheldonpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009-09-18 · Published · cited 9× · 982 A.2d 954; 159 N.H. 269
982 A.2d 954 (2009) Dennis TULLEY and another. v. William SHELDON and another. No. 2008-456. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Submitted: August 13, 2009. Opinion Issued: September 18, 2009. *955 Forman, Corcoran & Associates, P.A., of Londonderry (Thomas J. Corcoran on the brief), for the plaintiffs. Cr
Michigan Supreme Court · 2011-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 28, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 141355-59(131) Michael F. Cavanagh
California Court of Appeal · 2012-06-08 · Published · cited 80× · 206 Cal. App. 4th 1095; 12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6394
Opinion EPSTEIN, P. J. This case involves causes of action for malicious prosecution and defamation against attorneys of record in a prior case. As to the causes of action for malicious prosecution, we hold, among other things, that the attorneys’ anti-SLAPP1 special motions to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.) were improperly granted, and that attorneys who appear on all of the
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012-05-21 · Published · cited 30× · 680 F.3d 933; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10138; 2012 WL 1813694
680 F.3d 933 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, on the relation of Robert S. GOLDBERG and June Beecham, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-3785. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 19, 2011. Decided May 21, 2012. A. Colin Wexler (argued), Attorney, Goldberg Kohn Lt
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011-05-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 23, 2011 Session PATRICIA ANN GHO MASSEY v. GREGORY JOEL CASALS Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. F7887 Herbert Lane, Special Judge No. W2010-00284-COA-R3-JV - Filed May 3, 2011 Appellant filed a motion to quash garnishment of his individual retirement accounts
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023-10-24 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-00215-COA PATRICIA L. ROGERS EVANS APPELLANT v. UNKNOWN HEIRS OF DAN A. ARBUTHNOT, APPELLEES DECEASED, KEVIN SMITH, KARL HOLLIDAY, MARK HOLLIDAY, ROY LEE, AND MARYDIA BRECKINRIDGE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/02/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. E. VIN
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-03-06 · Published · cited 4× · 929 F. Supp. 2d 807; 2013 WL 870651; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31715
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. Robert S. Goldberg, M.D.1 and June Beeeham2 (collectively, “Relators”) bring this qui tam action under the provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA” or “the Act”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and the *811
Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 970 S.W.2d 440; 1998 Tenn. LEXIS 296
OPINION DROWOTA, Justice. In this workers’ compensation action, the employee, Patricia Love, plaintiff-appellant, has appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Madison County awarding her permanent total disability benefits to age 65 or until the payment of such benefits reached the maximum total benefit. The trial court apportioned the award 67.5 percent to the Second Injury Fund and 32.5 percent
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-11-02 · Published · cited 1× · 748 F. Supp. 2d 917; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116645; 2010 WL 4340455
748 F.Supp.2d 917 (2010) Robert S. GOLDBERG, M.D. and June Beecham, Relators, Bring this Action on behalf of the United States of America and the State of Illinois, Plaintiffs, v. RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER; Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, LLC; Rush SurgiCenter, Ltd. Partnership; Brian J. Cole, M.D.; Mitchell B. Sheinkop, M.D.; Richard A. Berger, M.D.; Aaron G. Rosenberg, M.D.; Craig J. Della Valle, M.D.; and Wayne G. Paprosky, M.D., Defend
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 155 A.D.3d 1600; 63 N.Y.S.3d 299
Appeal from an order of the Niagara County Court (Sara Sheldon, J.), dated June 30, 2016. The order affirmed a judgment of the Niagara Falls City Court. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Carni, J.P., Lindley, DeJoseph, Troutman and Winslow, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 155 A.D.3d 1600; 63 N.Y.S.3d 299
Appeal from an order of the Niagara County Court (Sara Sheldon, J.), dated June 30, 2016. The order affirmed a judgment of the Niagara Falls City Court. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Carni, J.P., Lindley, DeJoseph, Troutman and Winslow, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 155 A.D.3d 1600; 63 N.Y.S.3d 299
Appeal from an order of the Niagara County Court (Sara Sheldon, J.), dated June 30, 2016. The order affirmed a judgment of the Niagara Falls City Court. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Carni, J.P., Lindley, DeJoseph, Troutman and Winslow, JJ.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991-07-05 · Published · cited 19× · 937 F.2d 1528; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14026
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge. Defendants/appellants Patricia Marie Pool and Larry Donald Baird appeal their sentences on convictions following pleas of guilty to one count of robbery of the Farmers Exchange Bank of Antlers, Oklahoma, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and 2. The appellants claim that the trial judge improperly departed upwards from the Sentencing Guidelines in pass
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023-02-15 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-728T (E-Filed: February 15, 2023) ) VENSURE HR, INC., ) ) Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Plaintiff, ) 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a); Employment )
Fong v. E. W. Bankpublic domain
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2018-01-09 · Published · cited 7× · 227 Cal. Rptr. 3d 838; 19 Cal. App. 5th 224
Tucher, J.* *226Plaintiff Sheldon Fong is an octogenarian real estate investor who sought to help some younger friends establish a real estate business. He borrowed money in his own name and stood behind two loans that he helped the new business procure from defendant East West Bank (Bank). When some of these transa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 NY Slip Op 7861
Finley v Ken Currie Motors, Inc. (2017 NY Slip Op 07861) Finley v Ken Currie Motors, Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 07861 Decided on November 9, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995-03-06 · Published · cited 10× · 49 F.3d 1312; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4243; 1995 WL 92708
FRIEDMAN, Semor Circuit Judge. A state prisoner appeals from the decision of the Urnted States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa ** dismissing after trial Ms complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) alleging that state correctional officers subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984-05-24 · Published · cited 17× · 733 F.2d 620
WALLACE, Circuit Judge: The district court dismissed Whittington’s declaratory judgment action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The issue before us involves the rule which requires federal jurisdiction to be demonstrated in a well-pleaded complaint. We affirm. I In 1976, Whi
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017-07-18 · Published · cited 4× · 166 A.3d 832; 174 Conn. App. 715; 2017 WL 3000684; 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 298
SHELDON, J. The plaintiff, Stones Trail, LLC, brought this action against the defendant, the town of Weston (town), arising from its attempts to develop certain real property located in Weston, alleging, inter alia, denial of equal protection of the law in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 19