⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Patricia L. McGaughey”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-08-25 · Published · cited 3× · 734 F. Supp. 2d 14; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88032; 2010 WL 3377694
734 F.Supp.2d 14 (2010) Alexandria McGAUGHEY, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. 07-1498(RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 25, 2010. *16 Bruce V. Spiva, The Spiva Law Firm, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Dwayne C. Jefferson, Patricia Ann Jones, Heathe
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-09-22 · Published · cited 2× · 740 F. Supp. 2d 23; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100962; 2010 WL 3732013
740 F.Supp.2d 23 (2010) Alexandria McGAUGHEY, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-1498 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 22, 2010. *25 Bruce V. Spiva, The Spiva Law Firm, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Dwayne C. Jefferson, Patricia Ann Jones, Heather
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991-03-05 · Published · cited 89× · 927 F.2d 505; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3373; 1991 WL 26223
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Patricia Joanne Settles brought suit in the United States District Court for *507 the District of Kansas, alleging that defendant Golden Rule Insurance Company’s actions in terminating her husband’s insurance coverage caused him to have a heart attack and die. Jurisdic
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 798 F.2d 1198; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28931
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Golden Rule Insurance Company appeals the entry after a bench trial of judgment against it in its action seeking to declare invalid a health insurance policy issued to Patricia Welsh. The district court 1 held that Golden Rule failed to prove a suff
Hart v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2007-09-20 · Published · cited 15× · 235 S.W.3d 858; 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 7558; 2007 WL 2727542
235 S.W.3d 858 (2007) Samuel Griffin HART, Appellant v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 11-06-00123-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. September 20, 2007. *860 Don L. Wilson, Attorney At Law, Abilene, Mark Gant Daniel, Attorney At Law, Fort Worth, TX, for appellant. James Eidson, District Attorney, Crim. Dist. Atty's O
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007-05-15 · Published · cited 8× · 500 F. Supp. 2d 1014; 2007 WL 1452031
500 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2007) Melvin GENENBACHER and Patricia Genenbacher, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CENTURYTEL FIBER COMPANY II, LLC, d/b/a LightCore, A CenturyTel Company, Defendant. No. 06-3064. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. May 15, 2007. *1015 Christopher D. Sc
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA S.E.N., : Petitioner : : v. : No. 651 C.D. 2023 : Argued: May 7, 2024 Department of Education : (Professional Standards and : Practices Commission), : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 928 F. Supp. 2d 63; 2013 WL 794345; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29093
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Vanessa Gates filed this complaint as the personal representative of the estate of her daughter, Tiffany Gates-Jackson, against the United States of America and the District of Columbia (“the District”), alleging that the defendants’ negligence was responsible for Gate
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001-07-23 · Published · cited 361× · 257 F.3d 14; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 16509; 2001 WL 812097
SELYA, Circuit Judge. In this sentencing appeal, we address for the first time two important questions. The principal question concerns the validity of an advance waiver of appellate rights contained in a plea agreement. 1 Although we conclude that such waivers are not forbidden, we refuse to give effect to the waiver in t
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2007-01-26 · Published · cited 4× · 471 F. Supp. 2d 716; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5748; 2007 WL 211100
471 F.Supp.2d 716 (2007) SONY PICTURES HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC., et al., Plaintiff, v. Charles LOTT, Defendant. No. 4:06CV322 A. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. January 26, 2007. *717 *718 Patricia Beaujean Lehtola, Vial Hamilton Koch & Knox, Dallas, TX, Karen
N. Olmstead v. Rockpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 11× · 2018 Ohio 1084
[Cite as N. Olmstead v. Rock, 2018-Ohio-1084.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 105566 CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
Winslow v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022-11-02 · Published · cited 6× · 315 Ga. 133
315 Ga. 133 FINAL COPY S22A0498. WINSLOW v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. William Sanford Winslow was convicted on four counts of sexual exploitation of children in connection with his possession of two videos depicting children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The videos were found on his laptop computer by law enforcement. On appeal, Winslow raises three enumerations of error: (1) the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained f
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002-07-16 · Published · cited 9× · 295 F.3d 152; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14279; 2002 WL 1485140
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Steven K. Brown pled guilty to nine offenses, including kidnapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1). On appeal, Brown seeks to vacate his kidnapping conviction, arguing that the indictment failed to allege a necessary element of the kidnapping offense under which he was sentenced. Even assuming the indictment was wanting in some
District Court, D. Kansas · 1989-06-08 · Published · cited 2× · 715 F. Supp. 1021; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7379; 1989 WL 73426
715 F.Supp. 1021 (1989) Patricia Joanne SETTLES, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE CO. and Jim Toyne Insurance, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-2541-O. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 8, 1989. Dwight D. Sutherland, Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, Olathe, Kan., and Philip J. Adams, Jr., Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., for pl
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998-07-16 · Published · cited 20× · 148 F.3d 39; 1998 WL 377739
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Defendant Clifford A. Proctor, charged in a three-count superseding indictment, entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute a quantity of marijuana in violation of 21 IJ.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The government dismissed the remaining counts against him. Proctor appeals the district court’s denial of h
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-13-00106-CV Barry BROOKS, Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, Johanna Barton, and Jesse Rodriguez Benavides, Appellants v.
Waul v. Coughlinpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1997-12-16 · Published · cited 3× · 177 F.R.D. 173; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19924; 1997 WL 778365
OPINION COTE, District Judge. On April 17, 1997, a jury returned a verdict against plaintiff Andre Waul (“Waul”) and found defendants Ernest Davis, Jr. (“Davis”) and Edwin Muller (“Muller”)1 not liable on the claim of unlawful retaliation in violation of Section 1983 of Title 42, United States Code, and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. In brief
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997-11-25 · Published · cited 76× · 129 F.3d 663; 48 Fed. R. Serv. 47; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33461; 1997 WL 720942
McAULIFFE, District Judge. Thomas Bartelho was convicted of three counts of armed bank robbery (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2113(a) and (d)), three counts-of using a firearm in a crime of violence (18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)), and one count of robbery affecting commerce (18 U.S.C.A. § 1951). On appeal, Bartelho raises a number of evidentiary issues and challenges the district judge’s denial of his
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995-12-05 · Published · cited 67× · 71 F.3d 436; 43 Fed. R. Serv. 501; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33726; 1995 WL 704763
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Defendant-appellant Thomas Bartelho (“Bartelho”) challenges his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 and 924. After a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Maine, Bartelho was sentenced on May 26, 1995 to 120 months incarceration. We affirm his conviction. I.
Ierardipublic domain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975-01-17 · Published · cited 15× · 321 N.E.2d 921; 366 Mass. 640; 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1126
366 Mass. 640 (1975) 321 N.E.2d 921 WILLIAM NICHOLAS IERARDI, petitioner. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. October 8, 1974. January 17, 1975. Present: TAURO, C.J., REARDON, QUIRICO, HENNESSEY, & KAPLAN, JJ. Margaret D. McGaughey (Patricia A. O'Neil with her) for the petitioner. Michael C. Donahue,</