Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Patricia L. McGaughey”
McGaughey v. District of Columbiapublic domain
734 F.Supp.2d 14 (2010) Alexandria McGAUGHEY, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. 07-1498(RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 25, 2010. *16 Bruce V. Spiva, The Spiva Law Firm, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Dwayne C. Jefferson, Patricia Ann Jones, Heathe
McGaughey v. District of Columbiapublic domain
740 F.Supp.2d 23 (2010) Alexandria McGAUGHEY, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-1498 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 22, 2010. *25 Bruce V. Spiva, The Spiva Law Firm, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Dwayne C. Jefferson, Patricia Ann Jones, Heather
Patricia Joanne Settles v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.public domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Patricia Joanne Settles brought suit in the United States District Court for *507 the District of Kansas, alleging that defendant Golden Rule Insurance Company’s actions in terminating her husband’s insurance coverage caused him to have a heart attack and die. Jurisdic
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Golden Rule Insurance Company appeals the entry after a bench trial of judgment against it in its action seeking to declare invalid a health insurance policy issued to Patricia Welsh. The district court 1 held that Golden Rule failed to prove a suff
Hart v. Statepublic domain
235 S.W.3d 858 (2007) Samuel Griffin HART, Appellant v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 11-06-00123-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. September 20, 2007. *860 Don L. Wilson, Attorney At Law, Abilene, Mark Gant Daniel, Attorney At Law, Fort Worth, TX, for appellant. James Eidson, District Attorney, Crim. Dist. Atty's O
Genenbacher v. CenturyTel Fiber Co. II, LLCpublic domain
500 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2007) Melvin GENENBACHER and Patricia Genenbacher, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CENTURYTEL FIBER COMPANY II, LLC, d/b/a LightCore, A CenturyTel Company, Defendant. No. 06-3064. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. May 15, 2007. *1015 Christopher D. Sc
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA S.E.N., : Petitioner : : v. : No. 651 C.D. 2023 : Argued: May 7, 2024 Department of Education : (Professional Standards and : Practices Commission), : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A.
Gates v. United States of Americapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Vanessa Gates filed this complaint as the personal representative of the estate of her daughter, Tiffany Gates-Jackson, against the United States of America and the District of Columbia (“the District”), alleging that the defendants’ negligence was responsible for Gate
United States v. Teeterpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. In this sentencing appeal, we address for the first time two important questions. The principal question concerns the validity of an advance waiver of appellate rights contained in a plea agreement. 1 Although we conclude that such waivers are not forbidden, we refuse to give effect to the waiver in t
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment Inc. v. Lottpublic domain
471 F.Supp.2d 716 (2007) SONY PICTURES HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC., et al., Plaintiff, v. Charles LOTT, Defendant. No. 4:06CV322 A. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. January 26, 2007. *717 *718 Patricia Beaujean Lehtola, Vial Hamilton Koch & Knox, Dallas, TX, Karen
N. Olmstead v. Rockpublic domain
[Cite as N. Olmstead v. Rock, 2018-Ohio-1084.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 105566 CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
Winslow v. Statepublic domain
315 Ga. 133 FINAL COPY S22A0498. WINSLOW v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. William Sanford Winslow was convicted on four counts of sexual exploitation of children in connection with his possession of two videos depicting children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The videos were found on his laptop computer by law enforcement. On appeal, Winslow raises three enumerations of error: (1) the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained f
United States v. Brownpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Steven K. Brown pled guilty to nine offenses, including kidnapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1). On appeal, Brown seeks to vacate his kidnapping conviction, arguing that the indictment failed to allege a necessary element of the kidnapping offense under which he was sentenced. Even assuming the indictment was wanting in some
Settles v. Golden Rule Insurancepublic domain
715 F.Supp. 1021 (1989) Patricia Joanne SETTLES, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE CO. and Jim Toyne Insurance, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-2541-O. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 8, 1989. Dwight D. Sutherland, Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, Olathe, Kan., and Philip J. Adams, Jr., Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., for pl
United States v. Proctorpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Defendant Clifford A. Proctor, charged in a three-count superseding indictment, entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute a quantity of marijuana in violation of 21 IJ.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The government dismissed the remaining counts against him. Proctor appeals the district court’s denial of h
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-13-00106-CV Barry BROOKS, Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, Johanna Barton, and Jesse Rodriguez Benavides, Appellants v.
Waul v. Coughlinpublic domain
OPINION COTE, District Judge. On April 17, 1997, a jury returned a verdict against plaintiff Andre Waul (“Waul”) and found defendants Ernest Davis, Jr. (“Davis”) and Edwin Muller (“Muller”)1 not liable on the claim of unlawful retaliation in violation of Section 1983 of Title 42, United States Code, and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. In brief
United States v. Bartelhopublic domain
McAULIFFE, District Judge. Thomas Bartelho was convicted of three counts of armed bank robbery (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2113(a) and (d)), three counts-of using a firearm in a crime of violence (18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)), and one count of robbery affecting commerce (18 U.S.C.A. § 1951). On appeal, Bartelho raises a number of evidentiary issues and challenges the district judge’s denial of his
United States v. Bartelhopublic domain
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Defendant-appellant Thomas Bartelho (“Bartelho”) challenges his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 and 924. After a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Maine, Bartelho was sentenced on May 26, 1995 to 120 months incarceration. We affirm his conviction. I.
Ierardipublic domain
366 Mass. 640 (1975) 321 N.E.2d 921 WILLIAM NICHOLAS IERARDI, petitioner. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. October 8, 1974. January 17, 1975. Present: TAURO, C.J., REARDON, QUIRICO, HENNESSEY, & KAPLAN, JJ. Margaret D. McGaughey (Patricia A. O'Neil with her) for the petitioner. Michael C. Donahue,</