Cases

OPINION Justice FLAHERTY, for the Court. The defendant, Nestor Marulanda, appeals from an order of the Family Court following the expedited motion by the plaintiff, Patricia Pacheco, to suspend the defendant’s visitation rights with the parties’ minor child. In this appeal, the defendant argues that the hearing justice abused his

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-24-00534-CV MARIAH PACHECO AND SHELLY § On Appeal from County Court at Law YOUNG, Appellants § No. 1 V. § of Tarrant County (2024-007623-1)

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00534-CV ___________________________ MARIAH PACHECO AND SHELLY YOUNG, Appellants V. EMILIO GARCIA AND PATRICIA MENDOZA, Appellees On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024-007623-1 Before Sudd

OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Before the court is United States’ (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Default Judgment seeking $2,651,312.18 in civil penalties plus interest, costs, and fees against Defendant Jeanette Pacheco (“Pacheco”) for fraud under section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (2012).

OPINION Tsoucalas, Senior Judge: Before the court is United States’ (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Default Judgment seeking $2,651,312.18 in civil penalties plus interest, costs, and fees against Defendant Jeanette Pacheco (“Pacheco”) for fraud under section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (2012).1 Pl.’s Mot. for Entry of Default J. at 6, Ju

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen proceedings after the BIA found petitioners ineligible for cancellation of removal. The BIA declined to exercise its discretionary authority to grant petitioners’ motion to reopen sua sponte. This court does “not have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s refusal to reopen de

OPINION VIGIL, Judge. {1} This case requires us to determine the consequence of an interpreter being present while the jury deliberated Defendant’s guilt or innocence without the benefit of an oath or instruction to ensure that she neither participate in or interfere with the jury’s deliberations. We hold that in these circumstances there is a presumption of prejudice. Sin

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. David Rodriguez-Pacheco appeals from his sentence of thirty months’ imprisonment and three years of supervised release following his guilty plea to the crime of possession of child pornography. See 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B); see generally Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), 18 U.S.C. § 2251 et seq. Utilizing the advisory sentencing guidelines, the district court h

365 F.3d 1199 Veronica PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.WHITING FARMS, INC.; Thomas Whiting, individually; and N. Lyle Johnston, individually, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-1170. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 30, 2004. Submitted on the briefs:*

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-22-00424-CV UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant v. Patricia Y. MAYERS,

Opinion issued July 16, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00014-CV ——————————— UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON, Appellant V.

108 F.Supp.2d 1214 (2000) Judy BAILEY, guardian ad litem and next friend for M.W. and V.W., minors, Plaintiff, v. Harry PACHECO, Raul Gonzales, Sharon Mullen, Brenda Sandberg, Susan Elam, Maureen Grindell, Effie Osborne, John Kalejta, Nora Buchanan, Santiago Olivas, Rochelle Olivas and James Atkins, in their personal capacities acting under color of state law, Defendants. No. Civ. 96-959 LH/DJS. United

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00602-CV Phyllis K. PACHECO and Mark Pacheco, Appellants v. Larry W. FREISENHAHN, Jr., Manager and President of Freisenhahn Land Company, L.L.C., an

593 F.Supp.2d 599 (2009) Jose PACHECO, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, Defendant. Case No. 02-CV-9438 (KMK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 9, 2009. *604 Aaron David Frishberg, Esq., Stevens, Hinds, & White, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff. James Stuart Frank, Esq., David Ellis Pra

307 S.W.3d 499 (2010) Basith GHAZALI, M.D., Appellant, v. Patricia BROWN, Appellee. No. 2-09-191-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 25, 2010. *500 Michael A. Yanof, Stinnett, Thiebaud & Remington, LLP, Dallas, TX, for Appellant. Christopher S. Hamilton, Angela T. Pacheco, Standly & Hamilton LLP for

NO. 07-01-0169-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C FEBRUARY 12, 2002 ______________________________ PATRICIA GA

NO. 07-01-0169-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C FEBRUARY 12, 2002 ______________________________ PATRICIA GARCIA, APPELLANT V. BEVERLY WO

NO. 07-01-0169-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C FEBRUARY 12, 2002 ______________________________ PATRICIA GARCIA, APPELLANT</

820 So.2d 948 (2002) RAMON PACHECO & ASSOC., INC., Appellant, v. BETANCOURT CASTELLON ASSOC., INC., Appellee. No. 3D01-3361. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 1, 2002. Rehearing and Rehearing Denied July 19, 2002. *949 Carlton Fields and Patricia H. Thompson, Miami, and Joseph H. Lang,

100 P.3d 668 (2004) 136 N.M. 511 2004-NMSC-034 Ramon Pacheco MORALES and Similarly Situated Habeas Petitioners, Petitioners, v. Hon. Stephen BRIDGFORTH, District Judge. Respondent. No. 28,078. Supreme Court of New Mexico. October 26, 2004. *669 John Bigelow, Chief Public Defender, S