Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Patricia Thomas”
THOMAS MATHER v. PATRICIA MATHERpublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT THOMAS MATHER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
Patricia McKay v. Thomas G. Walkerpublic domain
HORTON, Justice. Patricia McKay appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Thomas Walker and Cosho Humphrey, LLP, in a legal malpractice action. McKay contended that Walker negligently drafted a property settlement agreement by failing to include provisions that would have resulted in a judgment lien against payments owed to her husband which were secured by a mortgage. T
Patricia Ann Thomas v. Statepublic domain
02-11-494-CR
Patricia Ann Thomas v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00494-CR PATRICIA ANN THOMAS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT C
Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.public domain
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: In view of the high import of Rule 11 to both the bench and bar, this Court took the instant case en banc to resolve any inconsistencies between previous opinions in this Circuit regarding procedures and standards for the imposition of sanctions under Rule 11, as amended in 1983. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.public domain
BY THE COURT: A majority of the Judges in active service, on the' Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *512 The Clerk will specif
William Robert Thomas v. Patricia Russell Thomaspublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23, 2007 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23, 2007. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Henry Thomas Fillion v. Caroline Patricia Corbettpublic domain
Opinion issued October 4, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00785-CV ——————————— HENRY THOMAS FILLION, Appellant V. CAROLINE FILLION, Appellee
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA YETLI PATRICIA DELGADO NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO MEJIA, Mother, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D15-3083 v. THOMAS ANTHONY SCARPELLO, Father, Appellee. _____________________________
Patricia B. Thomas v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed August 31, 2006 <
Order Remanding for Findings of Fact PER CURIAM., Following disciplinary proceedings, the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy (Real Party in Interest in this Court) suspended the accounting licenses of relators Carl Bass, Patricia Grutzmacher, and Thomas Bauer, Relators then obtained a. judgment in district court voiding those suspensions because of
Patricia E.K. v. Edward Thomas K.public domain
*1336Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered November 3, 2005. The order, inter alia, awarded custody of respondents’ child to petitioner. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the visitation provisions with respect to respon
10/08/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 14, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PATRICIA ANN BINGHAM, a.k.a. PATRICIA ANN STARNES Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2016-A-468 Monte D. Watkins, Judge
January 27, 2012 Mr. Bryce E. Benjet Hull Hendricks LLP 221 West Sixth Street, Suite 960 Austin, TX 78701-3407 Mr. Bill Davis Office of the Attorney General of Texas Office of Solicitor General P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059) Austin, TX 78711-2548 Honorable Rhonda G. Hurley Travis County 98th District Judge 1000 Guadalupe P.O. Box 1748 Austin, TX 78767 RE: Case Number: 11-0245 Court of Appeals Number: 03-10-00276-CV Trial Court Number: D-1-GN-09-00005
Patricia Faith Dickinson v. Joshua Thomas Dickinsonpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00489-CV Patricia Faith Dickinson, Appellant v. Joshua Thomas Dickinson, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 21-2995-FC3, THE HONORABLE DOUG ARNOLD, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM
ON RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEY’S ⅝' . ' FEES ■PER CURIAM; Geico General Insurance Company filed a petition for writ of certiorari challenging ah order requiring it to produce documents. Without ordering k response under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(h), this court denied the petition on August 18, 2015; Geic
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS (((((((((((((((( No. 11-0245 (((((((((((((((( In Re Carl Bass, Patricia Grutzmacher And Thomas Bauer, Relators (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( ORDER 1. The petition is AB
Thomas A. Shields v. Patricia N. Shieldspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ______________________
PER CURIAM. GEICO General Insurance Company petitions for a writ of certiorari to review an order that allows discovery of attorney-client privileged communication in a bad faith action. Following an in camera inspection, a special master determined that a number of documents from the insurer’s attorney’s litigation file in the underlying coverage case w
In the Matter of Patricia Ek v. Thomas K.public domain
10 N.Y.3d 731 (2008) In the Matter of PATRICIA E.K., Respondent, v. EDWARD THOMAS K., JR., Appellant, and HEIDI K., Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Submitted December 10, 2007. Decided February 7, 2008. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding withi