Cases

ORDER Appellant’s petition for rehearing by panel is granted. Further proceedings in this appeal will be held in abeyance pending the Missouri Supreme Court’s resolution of Watson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al., SC-93769, and Conway et al. v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al., SC-93951.

OPINION MARC W. BROWN, Justice. Appellants Johnny and Tina Collums appeal the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of appellee Ford Motor Company on appellants’ Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) 1 claims. The sole issue presented is whether the trial court erred.in granting sum

FILED May 12, 2022 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 21, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TINA M. DIXON Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Humphreys County No. 11671 George C. Sexton, Judge No. M2010-02382-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 21, 2012 A Humphreys County jury convicted the Defendant, Tina M. Dixon, of possession of more than one

FILED March 6, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA In re

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2015 Term FILED March 2, 2015 No. 14-0533 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

PD-0837-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/7/2015 1:35:14 PM Accepted 8/11/2015 1:48:39 PM

USCA11 Case: 20-13218 Date Filed: 08/25/2022 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-13218 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK EMEKA IFEDIBA, NGOZI JUSTINA OZUL

Opinion issued March 7, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00905-CR ——————————— PATRICK LEON WASHINGTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appell

WORKMAN, Justice, concurring: I concur in the Court’s disposition of all issues relating to Norma G., the children’s mother, who has demonstrated both by her words and her actions that she is unwilling and unable to acknowledge her culpability in this matter, unwilling and unable to accept services from DHHR,1 and unwilling and unable to protect the children in the future. I write

OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Because of an exemption written into the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Los Angeles City employees “engaged in fire protection” (i.e. firefighters) do not receive standard overtime pay — time and a half for all hours worked over forty in one *125

FARRELL, Justice: *5 The petitioner and defendant below, David M. Wasanyi, a pharmacist, was convicted in two separate trials of multiple felony counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance in violation of West Virginia Code § 60A-4-401(a) (2014).

NO. 07-05-0290-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 11, 2007 ______________________________ BROGAN, LTD., A Partnership, and TINA MARIE BROGAN, APPELLANTS

NO. 07-05-0290-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 11, 2007 ______________________________ BROGAN, LTD., A Partnership, and TINA M

NO. 07-05-0290-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 11, 2007 ______________________________ BROGAN, LTD.,

OPINION THOMAS, Circuit Judge: In this appeal we consider, among other matters, whether a school district’s failure to provide educational testing data to parents violated the procedural requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1487 (“IDEA” or “Act”). We conclude that it did. We also conclude that the failure to provide the data prevented the parents from meaningfull

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 796 {¶ 1} Appellant-father appeals the juvenile court's decision awarding legal custody of his two minor children to the children's maternal grandmother. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm. {¶ 2} In 2001, the father and grandmother sought legal custody of S.M

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT M.M.; E.M., individually and on No. 12-15769 behalf of their minor son C.M., Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:10-cv-04223-SI v. LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local educational agency; LAFAYETTE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendants-Appellees. M.M.; E.M., individually and on No. 12-1577

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT M.M.; E.M., individually and on No. 12-15769 behalf of their minor son C.M., Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:10-cv-04223-SI v. LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local educational agency; LAFAYETTE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendants-Appellees. M.M.; E.M., individually and on No. 12-1577

FILED February 13, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OF WEST VIRGINIA