Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Patterson v. United States Department of Health & Human Services”
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority undertakes a well-reasoned effort to uphold the Secretary’s interpretation of the term “entitled to” as neither contrary to Congress’s clear intent nor an impermissible construction of the term. We do not, however, write on a blank slate. We have already wrestled with the very statutory provision at issue and arrived at definitive conclusions as to its meaning. I
Holland v. Department of Health & Human Servicespublic domain
*1360 ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge. This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 26] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 16] be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were
Crosby v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************* MARK CROSBY, * * No. 18-1478V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: July 22, 2021 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fe
Pavan v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 28, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MICHAEL PAVAN, next friend of * J.P., a minor, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 14-60V * v. *
Silverio v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-235V Filed: November 14, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * KRISTEN SILVERIO, on behalf of her * To Be Published minor child, G.L., * *
Meyers v. Arkansas Department of Human Servicespublic domain
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge liThe Ouachita County Circuit Court granted permanent custody of the minor child, D.D., born June 23, 2014, to Bobby Delee, her father, and closed the dependency-neglect case that appellee Arkansas Department of Human Services (ADHS) had brought against D,D.’s mother, appellant Laura Meyers. Meyers argues on appeal -t
Marshall v. Department of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
RAYMOND MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. No. 2009-3086. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Decided: December 1, 2009. Andrew J. Dhuey, of Berkeley, California, argued for petitioner. Christopher A. Bowen, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, arg
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–1898 Submitted November 16, 2023—Filed April 12, 2024 TRACY WHITE, Appellee, vs. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Scott Rosenberg, Judge. State employer appeals judgment on jury verdict awarding damages for a hostile-work-environment claim under the Iowa Civil Rights Act.
Giannetta v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-215V (Filed: September 1, 2017) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALESSANDRA GIANNETTA, * To Be Published * Petitioner, * Meningococcal Vaccine; Menactra;
D.C. v. Department of Human Servicespublic domain
OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT D.C., who has been named as a perpetrator of child abuse in an indicated report, petitions for review of an adjudication of the Department of Human Services’ Bureau of Hearings and Appeals that denied his request for a nunc pro tunc healing.1 In doing so, the Bureau adopted the recommendation of its Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who c
Lehner v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 08-554V Filed: July 22, 2015 For Publication **************************** RICK LEHNER and * SHELLEY LEHNER, as parents and
572 F.Supp. 1235 (1983) Lillian EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF the UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. CV-82-3550. United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 19, 1983. *1236 *1237 LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & McRae, New York City, for plain
Joseph Rued v. Commissioner of Human Servicespublic domain
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A22-1420 Court of Appeals Procaccini, J. Took no part, Hennesy, Gaïtas, JJ. Joseph Rued, Appellant, vs. Filed: October 23, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 20–0804 Submitted March 23, 2021—Filed June 30, 2021 Amended September 14, 2021 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., on behalf of itself and its patients, Appellee, vs. KIM REYNOLDS, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, and KELLY GARCIA in her Official Capacity as Director of the Iowa Department of Human Services and Interim Direct
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 20–0804 Submitted March 23, 2021—Filed June 30, 2021 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., on behalf of itself and its patients, Appellee, vs. KIM REYNOLDS, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, and KELLY GARCIA in her Official Capacity as Director of the Iowa Department of Human Services and Interim Director of the Iowa Department of Public Health,
Appellate Case: 24-3041 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 12/30/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 30, 2025
OPINION BOB PEMBERTON, Justice. Although this appeal may stem from some broader controversies that have vexed both government and our larger society, our disposition of it ultimately turns on some comparatively narrow questions of judicial jurisdiction and procedure. More specifically, we must consider whether entities that formerly contracted with the State to provide services under a publicly
Naficy v. Illinois Department of Human Servicespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Hamida H. Naficy (“Naficy”), in her Fifth Amended Complaint, alleges that defendant Illinois Department of Human Services (“IDHS”) discriminated and retaliated against her on the basis of her national origin (Iranian) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”), an
W.C. v. Secretary of Health & Human Servicespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER1 LETTOW, Judge. Petitioner, W.C., seeks review of two decisions by a special master — one denying him compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub.L. No. 99-660, § 311, 100 Stat. 3743, 3755 (1986) (codified, as amended, at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -34 (“Vaccine Act”)), and another denying his motion to redact portions of the
ACCEPTED 03-15-00226-CV 6056931 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS